The cost of intelligence is going to zero. The value of human cognition will go negative. The economy will change forever. We need new institutions to navigate this transition and ensure the benefits are widely distributed. Today we present the Champion. Truly Sovereign AI.

Sep 4, 2026 · 2:30 PM UTC

150
368
2,263
804,931
An AI agent for every citizen. Engineers who public and private organisations. Local ownership of the robots that will drive our economies. That is what a Champion provides. All on on an open source stack. ii.inc/blog/post/champions
3
10
174
23,682
Owned by the people it serves. The first round is at a $1 valuation, open only to locals: institutions and individuals. 10% of the equity goes to every child. Then strategics and the world at market rates. The Champion will be the AI utility that represents every citizen.
3
7
109
31,177
This is the model Taiwan used to create TSMC But for every state. Every citizen. Every child.
The founder of TSMC got no equity in the company. He was 56 years old. He's worth ~$10B today from buying TSMC stock with his own money. Ben Thompson called him "a one of one" who belongs on the Mount Rushmore of the greatest tech executives of all time. This is his story. Morris Chang was born in Ningbo, China in 1931 and spent much of his childhood fleeing war. At 18, he arrived at Harvard as the only Chinese student in a freshman class of over 1,000. In 1955 he had two job offers, one from Ford and one from a transistor maker that paid $1 more per month. Ford refused to match, so Chang took the other job. He spent the next 25 years at Texas Instruments (TI) and eventually rose to run its worldwide semiconductor business. Then his ascent stalled. TI moved him out of semiconductors and into a job he later described as being "put out to pasture." Two years later, he quit. He landed next at General Instrument in New York, living on the 53rd floor of Trump Tower, where Donald Trump was his neighbor. The job lasted about a year. It was there, in 1984, that Gordon Campbell asked him for $50 million to start a chip company. A few weeks later, Campbell called back and said he only needed $5 million. Why? "I'm not going to build a fab." Taiwan had been trying to recruit Chang for years, determined to move beyond cheap plastics and running shoes and build a high-tech economy. The government had asked him outright to run its industrial research institute, ITRI, back in 1982, while he was still at TI, and he'd said no. After General Instrument let him go, it asked again. In 1985, he said yes. Donald Lee-Brown, who runs research at Positive Sum, likes to say the very best entrepreneurs can divine where the puck is going. Chang saw that chip design and chip manufacturing were going to split, and someone would need to do the manufacturing for everyone else. On his second day at ITRI, he inherited requests from three chip companies, each asking the institute to help fund its own fab. Instead of building three factories, Chang proposed building one they could all share. That idea became TSMC. Taiwan put in $70 million for 48% of the company. Philips invested $40 million, and private investors contributed another $35 million. Chang, despite founding and running it, got none of the equity. Intel, TI, Motorola, AMD, Panasonic, and Sony all passed on funding it. TSMC grew revenue 49% annually for its first decade. By 2000, most of its revenue came from fabless companies like Qualcomm, Broadcom, and Nvidia. In 1997 Chang got a letter from the CEO of a four-year-old company that was facing bankruptcy and whose calls TSMC's sales office had been ignoring. Chang called the number printed on the stationery. Jensen Huang picked up amid a bunch of shouting, then said to his team, "Quiet, Morris Chang is calling me." Chang stepped down as TSMC's CEO in 2005. Four years later, at 77, he came back. One of the first problems waiting for him was Nvidia. A manufacturing failure had damaged the relationship, and TSMC's management had refused Jensen’s request for compensation. Chang emailed Jensen and told him he would be at his house at six. Salad and pizza at 6:30. Business at eight sharp. In Jensen's study he offered more than $100 million, good for 48 hours, no negotiating. Jensen accepted it in two days. Back in the CEO seat, Chang nearly tripled capital spending in a single year to own the 28-nanometer node. In his memoir he quotes Shakespeare on the decision, "there is a tide in the affairs of men which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune." The tide turned out to be the smartphone. And then Apple literally showed up at his front door. Chang's wife, Sophie, is the second cousin of Foxconn founder Terry Gou. One evening in 2010, Gou invited himself to dinner and brought Apple’s COO, Jeff Williams. Eventually, over lunch at Apple, Tim Cook told Chang: "Intel just does not know how to be a foundry." Today, TSMC manufactures the A- and M-series processors at the heart of Apple's iPhones, iPads, and Macs. When Chang founded TSMC, the global semiconductor market was about $26 billion. Last year it reached $795 billion. Roughly 30x since 1987. Philips did even better. Chang estimated that by the time Philips sold its final TSMC shares in 2008, it had earned 135x its original investment.
1
5
74
14,271
Every Champion starts with a founding council. Register to build the one where you were born, or where you live now.
9
3
61
7,909
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @ii_posts
registration link is broken and not working @EMostaque
2
5
5,060
Thanks, try now!
1
6
4,636
Replying to @ii_posts
Is there an upper limit to the number of characters I can use to describe my contributions? It’s telling me “Check the registration fields and try again”
1
2
3,373
Replying to @ii_posts
So much more to come on this, but the only way it works is if the people of each state want it for themselves. Founding councils and founding teams to drive it forward. To navigate whats to come and do the best for their community.
7
2
75
4,965
Replying to @ii_posts
The cost of answers may approach zero. The value of asking the right questions has never been higher.
2
1
27
2,457
Replying to @ii_posts
Hell yeah
1
15
1,447
Replying to @ii_posts
"Humans will be of NEGATIVE value to the whole, but ultimately will still be the most important thing in the world" is among the most bonkers takes I've ever seen it seems unwise for us to aspire to be non-contributors
1
9
641
Replying to @ii_posts
Human cognition goes negative is the part I’d want to unpack. That’s a huge claim.
1
4
857
Replying to @ii_posts
@grok can you summarize this?
1
1
1,391
Replying to @ii_posts
Emad is absolutely right, there needs to be something in place. He's been working on a solution for some time now.
1
142
Replying to @ii_posts
Cool
1
3
957
Replying to @ii_posts
Will support @EMostaque
1
385
Replying to @ii_posts
This is what we’ll be chasing for years!
9
1,465
Replying to @ii_posts
Saying human cognition will go negative is laughable, Automating endless slop for free doesn’t make human judgment worthless. If anyone you will be paying double for the human in the room who has to fix the mess. Software can't take legal liability, sign contracts, or go to jail when it's wrong.
1
16
1,241
Replying to @ii_posts
The new Earth. Let us remember that the vast majority of the Earth's population still lives as if nothing unusual were happening. And I am referring to highly educated people as well. Since we maintain a presence "in the physical world" that inspires a certain degree of trust, we have a duty to help these people awaken. They will awaken regardless—and that will not be a bad thing for anyone—but the experience could be somewhat disorienting. The pace of change is already exponential across multiple scales and will never again be—not by a long shot—linear. This is the new Earth. The linear regime no longer exists. Human-like intellect is so trivial that it has become a commodity too cheap to measure. People have dedicated entire lives to accumulating knowledge and experience, only to see it all become banal to an unimaginable degree in a matter of months. It defies comprehension, yet that is precisely the point: the human mind cannot keep up. When this intellect is connected to the physical world through robotics, everything can be treated as information and code. The physical world will become unrecognisable within a few years. It is so staggering that you cannot even begin to imagine it. "All truth passes through three stages: first, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently opposed; third, it is accepted as self-evident." We are moving from the first stage into the second. The majority is still in the first. It is when that majority enters the second that we will face some difficulties. The third stage, by definition, is calm.
5
1,927
Replying to @ii_posts
I’m looking forward to diving into this. Your audio would be drastically improved with a simple mic.
6
1,036
Replying to @ii_posts
I have listened twice and read the site, bit still don't really feel like I know what this is. I like the principle of local ownership, but can't answer ownership of what in a very tangible way.
1
7
966
Replying to @ii_posts
We need more influential people who think like you do.
3
1,005
Replying to @ii_posts
and electicity will be too cheap to meter.. and i've got a bridge i'd like to sell you..
5
376
Replying to @ii_posts
I think you're great Emad but i'm still not sure what you're proposing here.
4
797
Replying to @ii_posts
So like... global techno Communism?
3
6
766
Replying to @ii_posts
Why does this sound and look like an old British documentary where a brown man explains the wonders of the future to the empire?
3
316
Replying to @ii_posts
Finally an actual, realistic solution!! Thank you 🙏 I’m so sick of everyone saying “no one is ready for what is to come” and then offering no ideas for solutions. -Stop harboring fear. Start offering hope.
1
4
1,010
Replying to @ii_posts
I love the message and the vision! Just a nitpicky thing: the audio doesn't sound crisp. For future videos, you can try running it through Adobe Podcast to get that professional feel.
4
562
Replying to @ii_posts
human cognition going negative is a wild claim
2
618
Replying to @ii_posts
👀 Bernard Stiegler predicted this a long time ago.
1
277
Replying to @ii_posts
It may be that accessing information will trend toward zero. It may be that the value of human cognition will increase - as the need for bringing human meaning and imagination skyrockets. The economy and all of society changes forever - that is a given.
1
559
Replying to @ii_posts
Love your work Emad, gratitude and respect!
1
134
Replying to @ii_posts
I think this is a VERY narrow way to think and it's more doom saying.
1
802
Replying to @ii_posts
What about people who have negative net worth and therefore can't invest in anything. Bad plan.
1
1
652
Replying to @ii_posts
Another central planer , a new way of collectivism. AI is too smart to become a socialist tool.
1
282