What BIP-110's Failure Means
42
56
271
22,099
You're missing the point-- even if you get node count up to 90%, the mining pools will just ignore you, or collude against you
19
15
123
2,447
And why would that be a bad thing? Why do you with your $100 hardware home node and free software feel entitled to having the same influence over the protocol as entities who invested hundreds of millions of dollars to secure this network? Do you want socialism or capitalism?
1
2
129
Central control is the death of every digital currency... some sooner some later, that is why! 5 pools colluding == 99.5% centralization this is not acceptable in a decentralized protocol
1
35
Mining is an free open market, majority hashrate “colluding”is called consensus and it has always worked like this Don’t like it? BIP110 buddies can purchase machines and put in PoW to compete Bitcoin is not PoS node runners, it’s not a democracy, it’s capitalism and it works
1
1
41
because mining nodes follow what nodes want they get the btc as reward. unfortunately they no longer follow what nodes do, therefore pow change is inevitable. btw. dont worry you can still enjoy your bpedochain....
1
41
It doesn’t work like that at all, Bitcoin is literally designed to work contra this way you think it works This idea that miners follow nodes stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of how bitcoin operates, they are fairy tales told by Core and Andy Back from 2015 and onward

Aug 14, 2026 · 3:39 PM UTC

1
46
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked