turning products into games ⊹ ࣪ ˖ design at tyb ⊹ ࣪ ˖

london and asia
0 to 1 product and brand work for trailers, the platform to launch and buy into any project
3
41
1,353
gpt dots
brands in tech are stale bc most approach it like it’s product “there’s a common pattern, let’s copy it because it must work” this totally holds up for an app, but completely falls apart for its identity you need to get to the core of who you are and what you’re trying to say there’s no pattern to copy
2
460
brands in tech are stale bc most approach it like it’s product “there’s a common pattern, let’s copy it because it must work” this totally holds up for an app, but completely falls apart for its identity you need to get to the core of who you are and what you’re trying to say there’s no pattern to copy
1
10
820
two of the best comments i got about my work recently: ‘you seem like a special projects type of person’ ‘your site might give the client epilepsy’
1
14
594
soo many brands have loyalty programmes backwards: the common mistake is thinking the loyalty game in itself is enough incentive to acquire and retain the best ones still sell the brand first as their foundation. the rest is almost just a byproduct
3
436
there are entire companies out there being built and sold on the sole premise of looking different just think about that for a sec.. staleness is your biggest opportunity
271
in design school we often talked about how tech and infra-level design can be exclusionary i often didn’t encounter it (privilege), but recently hitting walls more often 1. my last name is often not characterised as an alphabetical letter (it has an á in it). anglosphere-centric input fields, super common 2. my face is not being recognised by ai-verification services, commonly required for finance apps (kyc). since a lot of these systems are trained on a gender binary, and assume appearances stay static, they will struggle with more diverse faces that may look different to your government id, and change over time design expresses the cultural viewpoints of its makers, and by extension, it will also express how narrow the markers’ viewpoints are digital infra, much like physical, should be for its population, not for its makers
11
578
i will absolutely not be updating our app design to iphone duo (yet) 0 tangible return, aand lots of work for a likely 1% use case
2
379
the biggest tension in making fintech game-like is between trust and expression historically, finance needed to be plain to convey that trust. while more recently, we’re adding game mechanics and visuals to finance today’s under 25s might be the first generation that can reconcile these two
4
375
the closest we ever got to everything apps is the terminal
1
1
12
746
it never fails to amaze me how little physical location matters for work if you optimise for the global town hall i spent nearly a year in asia total, and found little to no difference in my work life compared to when i was in california or london insane ?
2
13
1,078
on the flip side of this, queerness in tech is incredibly isolating some friends shared the same sentiment in convos recently – the tech industry just doesn’t know how to interact with visible queerness outside of purely work settings, i almost always get a sense of discomfort from others i can’t even tell you the amount of times we just can’t seem to find a shared language with someone new i met queerness is in visible contrast to what this industry has built its cultural foundations on, and where it’s heading politically we’re living outside normative timelines and have to construct our own scripts for life, which is the total opposite of the tech in-group the visible contrast, the discomfort, and uncertainty around judgment – these all contribute to us putting up walls, or just withdrawing from these spaces entirely
working in tech as a queer person is simultaneously the most freeing and vulnerable experience i’m so grateful i never had my identity and expression questioned, so much so that it fades to the background the freedom that comes with this feels genuinely affirming. we’re all just here to create great work, and we’re judged on merit, not identity at the same time, a lot of us depend on sv pay to fund things that help us understand and navigate queerness: therapy to unlearn internalised judgement, moving costs to live in cities that feel safe for us, or gender affirming care leaving this industry is not an option for many, which exposes us to a lot of vulnerability thankfully i also find it fulfilling to work in this sector – creating something closer to an interdependent experience, where both me and the things we build can flourish
2
15
1,902
iris retweeted
I love product design: prototyping, visual design, animation, code, research I love product design: adoption, activation, retention, monetization, churn
9
19
204
9,506
ㅤ #ㅤ̵̤͇̑̎̿̾̒̚ ㅤ             ̴͎̒ͤ̎ͤ͊ ̬ͯͥ͒́ͨ͢͠ ̴̝̤̝̱͉ ̜̻̄ͫ̽̆̿̄͌ ͯ̆̿ ̙̼̲̠ ̝̦̼̖̻͕̉ͬ̋̇̅̔̚ ̠̣̬̓ͧͥ̂ͩ ̴̫ ̤͊͠ͅͅ◯̸̲͓̋ͥ̊̒͂̌ͅ #̰̫̦͍̬̥̿̓̍̋̊͜ͅ ́ͫ͆̍̽͌ͮ ͎͖̘̂ͮ̅̍ͭͯ ͚͕̣̏͑̎͑͆̃͆͞ ̞̖͖̆̎͂ͣ̔͡ ̺̣͙̻̙ͩ̂̂̄̃ͦ͜ ͓͍̗͔͓̍́ ̡̯̒̂͊ ̛̬͇̱͎̓̀̄ ̷̫͉̼̮̩͈̓̑ͭ◯̝͕̳ͅ ͫ҉͈ ̜̰̫̆́ͭ̑ ̧̫͙ͬ ㅤ
2
31
207
5,023
grok bot has to be the perfect example of meeting people where they are personifying agents, and plugging them into an app that resembles how you already work today. you just get it, because you’ve seen it before familiar analogies gets you momentum for new patterns
6
353
everything is becoming a search engine by proxy, everything is becoming a bank or a payment layer too
3
9
1,389
create colour associations for your features
create colour associations from the point of onboarding you know how games colour code items by rarity? you can do that with your features
13
823
ai apps are accidentally building western everything apps prediction: everything apps will evolve out of ai interfaces. connectors will be similar to mini apps in wechat we’re already seeing the pattern of a single app (claude, chatgpt), being the interface to others for work: communication, code, design, now can all be tapped into from one place similarly in the consumer space, commerce, shopping, and health too are now accessible through a single interface ok ok but why does this matter? for users: less sign-ups, downloads, and entering payment details each time for devs: faster releases with lower cost (bypasses apple and google), and native discovery from some of the highest dau apps
3
11
743
apps will entirely be invisible or live as embeds you can already do a lot of your daily work, discovery, and purchases from your ai chat – essentially a primitive everything app as integrations to these become better, the incentive to have a standalone app will become way less appealing: higher friction to get a new app, no shared context across one identity this basically leaves an app with 3 possible paths: 1. live inside an everything app like an ai chat, but be invisible (fully abstracted) 2. retain its own front-end, while living inside an everything app 3. attempt to become an everything app itself
4
12
1,656
my bet is 2 or 3 orgs will try to retain brand equity, and enter the race to be the place where everything happens users will still need mental separation between functions, which is what branding does what’s clear already: the standalone app format is becoming less viable
1
186