Most people hate Indians because every time they pick up the phone someone with a thick Indian accent is trying to scam them. Indian hatred will stop when Indians stay in India and can grow their economy without scamming first world nations.

I just love the fact that the immediate pivot after the campus rape hoax Hysteria from 2013 - 2015 was for the same college educated women shitlibs to immediately pivot to getting troon identifying men showing their cocks to women in locker rooms as fast as possible

25 years later and "just fucking kill them all" would have been the better approach all along.

How do I get Indian scammers to stop calling me? I used to waste their time by answering and telling them I was a 62 year old man named "George Uradalit" but now I just don't answer and let it ring.

“Your ARR is adjusted. Your EBITDA is adjusted. You're paying PIK. And every time you come in here, you're asking for more money”

“You can’t solve problems with violence” *opens history book. Well well well

I have no common purpose or goals with Bangladeshi nationals who move into my state and immediately begin passing laws to strip me of my gun rights. Your appeals to unity and pluralism are mutually exclusive.

Very well said!

I have been saying this for years!

Dear Virginia, my beloved Virginia.. I figure the people of Virginia have 21 enemies. 21 traitors to the Constitution. Be that as it may, I think we have a larger problem still. Going through the Senate profiles, I see that of the 21 names, only about half were born in Virginia; the rest were from places like Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York. But two names.. they weren’t even born in the United States at all. How would I be received if I moved to Bangladesh and tried to outlaw Cricket.. or the dumping of sewage in the water supply? Salim.. was born in Bangladesh and didn’t touch United States soil until he was 16-17 years old. How would I be viewed if I moved to India and tried to outlaw throwing trash all over the ground or leaving your children to be crushed under the wheels of a 300-ton rolling temple? Srinivasan.. was born in India. Now of course you’ll claim: “But Travis! Are you being racist?!?” And of course I would respond, no, I’m pointing out the irony of moving to a country and then trying to eliminate one of their human rights that their ancestors fought and died for. Wouldn’t these men be welcomed here if they accepted their new home as the gift that it is, instead of trying to harm it? Without their votes, this likely would not have passed… Of course the Senate President, our Lieutenant Governor.. Hasmi.. was also.. born in India.. she would have cast the deciding tiebreaker vote at 19-19. Do YOU want to live in Bangladesh or India? These three definitely did not want to live in Bangladesh or India. They came here, to OUR home. Welcomed as guests, but now they want to slide a knife in our backs as thanks.. Should we tolerate when people move here and truly become American? I think we should. Sure. Because THAT.. is what’s called assimilation. It’s rare, but it does happen.. Should we tolerate when those foreign-born want to move here and begin to destroy our human rights, knowing full well the state of the very countries they once called home? No, I think that cannot be called tolerance, I think that should be considered for what it is.. suicidal empathy.. and becoming slaves to invaders. Will you allow yourself to become a slave to those moving from everywhere else? To give up your human rights that your ancestors died to acquire and preserve? All in the name of tolerance? I do very much hope you won’t. “Sic Semper Tyrannis” isn’t some edgy and cool-sounding Latin phrase our Founders put there. It’s a promise. A creed if you will. A guarantee of what happens when tyrants come around peddling their favorite line “This is for your protection!” or “We’re just trying to help!” The worst atrocities in human history that we now study all began with those famous lines that “This is for your protection!” and were always coupled with disarming the targeted populations. Virginia, stand up, and defend yourselves. Defend what you hope to leave to your children someday. Because your enemies are already within the gates.

One of Trump's greatest legacies will be how he blew up a half-century of western diffidence, restraint, and failure on terrorism. As the era of Islamic terrorism began in the 1970s, western countries (very much including Israel) spun up all kinds of pseudo-sophisticated theories and excuses to avoid carrying out the only successful policy, which is killing terrorists -- as many as you can, whenever you can. There are entire university departments, think tanks, media outlets, NGOs, foundations, and political parties devoted to promoting self-defeating, enervating fictions about terrorism designed to tie the hands of the West. We just have to live with it, deal with it, accommodate it, accept the barbarism. Terrorists have grievances. It's partly our fault, after all, because reasons. There are no military solutions. If we're nice to the terrorists they will actually help us stabilize the region. The tropes go on forever and they are invented by people who want the west to lose, and who would rather be wrong but appear sophisticated than be right and appear crude. Trump wants our side to win. The winning approach to terrorism is very simple. Bomb them to smithereens. Kill them off. Decapitate the regimes. Sanction them until they have no more money for jihad. Trump gets it, because unlike so many people in politics, he doesn't care whether Harvard likes him. Winning is going to generate a real peace dividend for America. Finally dealing with Iran -- the head of the snake -- will enable the US to step away from the Middle East. It will send a message to our adversaries that the big dog is still in charge. And very enjoyably, it will sweep aside decades of dumb elite groupthink about how we have no alternative but to cut deals with terrorists. Thank you President Trump.

RT @TheHarrisSultan: That Jackie Chan punch was so fast, had to slow it down to see it. 😳

Conservatives generally defend Voter ID laws by insisting that all voters will be able to figure out how to get a valid ID, so the law won't disenfranchise anyone. But the truth is that a certain small percentage of voters actually won't be able to figure it out, which means that a certain percentage will be defacto disenfranchised. And that is all the MORE reason to put these laws in place. If you're so dumb, befuddled, and incompetent that you can't manage to perform such a basic task, then you are not qualified to vote. You don't deserve to have a say over the direction of the country. Stay home and let the competent adults handle it.

I am far from "MAGA faithful" - but I have come to hate them as much as any "faithful" Every April, I get a bill where my labor is stolen from me at gunpoint. I don't care if 1% of that is some lazy ass who is here to mooch off me, I would indeed rather see bodies in the street than that. But obviously, there is the small % of aliens who have been paying taxes, taking no services, obeying all the laws. I certainly don't dislike them all that much, but how do you want to filter all of them? Do we have a hearing for each one where we say "you broke the law coming here, so lets see if you did so and then made something of yourself?" A "you're a good one" exception? I might be able to go along with that, but then the way that gets used is every one of the shitbags (who are the majority) get to jam up the system for 10 years while they continue to collect benefits and enshittify my former country. Now lets also consider that I don't even compete with these people. They're not taking lawyer jobs. They're making my housekeeping bills cheaper, my roofing bills cheaper, and my lawn care cheaper... so in some ways, I'm thrilled they are here. and that was once my position. Until I got in a debate with a lawn care guy. Me and my four academic degrees got the rhetorical shit kicked out of me and had to concede... he was right. He did everything right his whole life, and his livelihood tanked because there's no competing with people who flood in and work sub-minimum wage. Now we're also not allowed nuance. So if you want any of them deported you're "a nazi" so once I'm over that line, fuck it, get the fuck rid of all of them. Now personally, I could tell you the locations of at least a dozen illegals I know personally. At least half of them are people I sincerely dislike and I hope they get deported. I'm not at the point that I would turn them in -- not my job. But these mass raids and deportations, I'm pleased about it. I'd rather they go the way they used to be -- an illegal gets picked up for domestic violence, and ICE is waiting for them when they get let out. But, the culture war has made it that these cities and states that hate trump, and hate me for being a white male, decided that they wouldnt cooperate. so now we have what we have . Bottom line, i've been forced to take a side. I take the side of mass deportations in a reign of terror, because the only alternative being offered is "tear down the border and flood the country" Give me a binary choice, and I choose this. Give me more nuanced realistic choices and I will pick one, but we have an A or B here. I choose A.

India: 1.4 billion people - 2 Winter Olympic athletes Ireland: 5 million people - 4 Winter Olympic athletes

$HNRG why does Lubar & Co (private equity fund) own 12.4% of the company?