@GiveSendGo Part of our rationale for allowing fundraising campaigns for people accused of violent crimes is to uphold two core principles: innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and freedom of speech — which includes the right to support legal defense. (Both biblical values) Beyond that, it helps expose weaknesses in the justice system and puts pressure on it to operate fairly. Justice should be blind to race and wealth, but those foundational principles have been steadily eroding. By equalizing the playing field, we shine a light on those discrepancies and help push the system toward real reform.

Its a great weekend to go see the new Daniel movie in AMC theaters!

Institutions want control. We want freedom. The public can finally back science asking the questions they care most about.

Replacement. Not the alternative.

Thanks for having me on Kangmin!

“I will give thanks to you, LORD, with all my heart; I will tell of all your wonderful deeds.” Psalms 9:1

The GiveSendGo founders joined the cast and creators of Daniel and the Fiery Furnace on the red carpet! We’re honored to support a film sharing this powerful biblical story on the big screen. Go see it in theaters now! 🎬🙌

Thanks @Tomhennessey69 Great work!

*BREAKING NEWS* I have just finished a phone call with the lone juror in the Lindsay Clancy case. I have also recently engaged in a great call with his Attorney @EdPaltzik. The Lone Juror is being added to the campaign as the recipient. His identity has been verified. Thank you all for your generosity to this campaign. Keep Shining Brightly!

Drastic times call for drastic measures. At GiveSendGo, we take seriously our responsibility to make sure funds raised on our platform are received quickly and efficiently by the intended recipient named in the campaign. We have a dedicated team for that purpose. When a campaign draws significant public attention, we heighten the scrutiny around verification and identification of the proper recipient. This morning, as many of you know, GiveSendGo is hosting a campaign created by Tom Hennessy for the lone juror in the Lindsay Clancy case. Because of the public profile of this case and the amount raised, we have been trying to reach the juror as soon as possible so he can receive the funds generous Givers have given. Due to my proximity to the area, I attempted to contact him directly at his home this morning to establish a way to get him those funds. I was not able to reach him. I understand that when a large amount of money is raised for an individual, it can attract opportunists of every kind. Our model has always been to create a clear, easy, and transparent way for people to receive donations with as little interference as possible. We will continue looking for ways to connect with the intended recipient and get him his funds as soon as possible. I will continue to update people as we get closer to connecting with the juror.

Giving hope is easier than you might think. Find a fundraiser that speaks to your heart, choose a one-time or monthly gift, leave an encouraging message, and complete your donation securely—all in just a few steps. Ready to make a difference? Visit zurl.co/2YE0U.

Swipe to see a step-by-step process on how to start a GiveSendGo fundraiser!

When people say they don’t like @GiveSendGo as a fundraising platform it is usually because we allow legal fundraisers they don’t like. When people say they don’t like our competitors it is usually because they cancel legal fundraisers for legitimate causes. If we are going to be disliked I prefer it be for standing for freedom over censorship every day of the week.

This campaign is trending: givesendgo.com/standwithjuro…

Today, we remember Charlie Kirk and the legacy he left behind—one marked by bold faith, unwavering conviction, and the courage to stand for what he believed. Gone, but never forgotten.

A donation gets you two tickets! givesendgo.com/danielmovie

Happening now in Manchester NH! Revive the spirit of the nations youth Lord!

A tiny glimpse of God's glory on display in creation.

The more faithfully you study Scripture, the more you see God's tremendous emphasis on FAITH, not merely some hidden decree standing behind faith and unbelief as the real explanation for everything. I know every serious Christian has read, or at least spent some time in, the book of Hebrews. But have you ever stopped to wonder why that important book gives us heroes of FAITH, and not heroes of God's secret election? That question has stayed with me since trying to provide a reasonable biblical answer to Dr. White's question about John 6: “All that the Father giveth me shall come to me.” (John 6:37) And the disagreement isn't that the Father gives and that those He gives come to the Son. It is over the mechanism by which Scripture says people come to God and belong to His saving people. And this is precisely where I believe Calvinistic exegesis can reverse the biblical order. If the decisive explanation for why one person comes to Christ while another does not is that, before either believed or disbelieved, God secretly selected one for irresistible saving grace while withholding that grace from the other, then faith and unbelief become downstream consequences of a more fundamental distinction. One believes because he was selected and irresistibly enabled to believe. The other remains in unbelief because that same saving enablement was never given to him. But is that how Scripture itself explains the distinction? Now, consider Hebrews 11. If the decisive distinction throughout redemptive history were fundamentally an invisible division between those secretly selected for irresistible faith and those passed over, Hebrews had the perfect opportunity to tell us. Instead, its great refrain is: “BY FAITH…” Abel. Enoch. Noah. Abraham. Sarah. Isaac. Jacob. Joseph. Moses. Israel. Even Rahab, the gentile. And right in the middle of this magnificent testimony Scripture gives us the governing principle: “WITHOUT FAITH it is impossible to please him: for he that COMETH TO GOD must BELIEVE…” Hebrews 11:6 You should read that again. HE THAT COMETH TO GOD MUST BELIEVE. That is not man's alternative mechanism competing with God's sovereignty. That is God's own sovereignly established mechanism for coming to Him. God determines the object: Christ. God provides the sacrifice: Christ. God reveals the truth. God gives the promise. God sends the Word. God calls. God draws. God saves. But Scripture repeatedly places before the hearer a meaningful distinction: Will God's testimony be received by faith, or rejected in unbelief? And what follows repeatedly turns upon that distinction. Rahab may be one of Scripture's most striking demonstrations. She lived in Jericho, a Canaanite city under judgment, which many often assume was designed as a vessel of wrath. Yet she tells Israel's spies: “WE HAVE HEARD how the LORD dried up the water of the Red sea for you…” Joshua 2:10. What more gospel message do the inhabitants of Canaan need? Notice: WE HAVE HEARD. The revelation of God's mighty acts had reached Jericho. But Rahab responds in FAITH: “The LORD your God, he is God in heaven above, and in earth beneath.” Joshua 2:11 Now listen to the Holy Spirit's interpretation centuries later: “BY FAITH the harlot Rahab perished not with them that BELIEVED NOT.” Hebrews 11:31 What distinction does inspired Scripture emphasize? Not: secretly elected / secretly passed over. But: BY FAITH / BELIEVED NOT. That does not prove Rahab was outside God's sovereign purpose. Of course not. The point is subtler and much more important: The inspired author makes faith and unbelief morally and theologically explanatory. Rahab heard and believed. Others heard and believed not. One did not perish. The others did. And this is hardly an isolated pattern. God asked the wilderness generation: “How long will it be ere they BELIEVE me, for all the signs which I have shewed among them?” Numbers 14:11 Hebrews later explains their exclusion: “They could not enter in because of UNBELIEF.” Hebrews 3:19 Why did God's Word not profit them? “Not being mixed with FAITH in them that heard it.” Hebrews 4:2 And therefore comes the warning: “Today if ye will HEAR his voice, HARDEN NOT YOUR HEARTS.” Hebrews 3:15 Do not miss the moral architecture: God speaks. Man hears. And Scripture confronts him with: FAITH or HARDENING. That same architecture appears throughout Scripture. Abraham: “He BELIEVED in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.” Genesis 15:6 Nineveh: “The people of Nineveh BELIEVED GOD.” Jonah 3:5 In fact, Jesus later says that Nineveh will rise in judgment against His generation because “they repented at the preaching of Jonas” while something greater than Jonah stood before Israel (Matthew 12:41). And Jesus Himself explains condemnation this way: “LIGHT IS COME INTO THE WORLD, and men LOVED DARKNESS rather than light.” John 3:19 Notice again: Revelation is given. Light comes. God speaks. And Scripture takes man's response seriously. That is precisely why Jesus can lament: “Ye WILL NOT COME TO ME, that ye might have life.” John 5:40. Jesus is basically saying, you are not part of those the Father is giving me because of your unbelief. He does not say they were desperately trying to come but discovered themselves excluded from an eternal decree. The Father had testified (John 5:37). The Scriptures testified (5:39). Moses testified concerning Christ (5:46). Yet: “Had ye BELIEVED Moses, ye would have BELIEVED me.” Now suddenly John 6 becomes much clearer. Jesus says: “He that COMETH TO ME shall never hunger; and he that BELIEVETH ON ME shall never thirst.” John 6:35 Coming and believing are placed together. Then: “Ye also have seen me, and BELIEVE NOT.” v.36 Then: “All that the Father giveth me shall COME TO ME.” v.37 Then Jesus establishes divine necessity: “No man can COME TO ME, except the Father which hath sent me DRAW him.” v.44. Amen. Man does not autonomously discover or save himself. The Father must draw. But then Jesus tells us something enormously important about that drawing: “It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all TAUGHT OF GOD. Every man therefore that hath HEARD, and hath LEARNED of the Father, COMETH unto me.” v.45 Jesus does not leave “drawing” floating in theological abstraction. He reaches into the prophets and speaks of: TAUGHT → HEARD → LEARNED → COMETH. And Hebrews has already supplied the theological connection: “He that COMETH TO GOD must BELIEVE.” This is why we cannot simply insert an entire Calvinistic ordo salutis into the word “giveth” and then announce that John 6 proves it. John 6 unquestionably teaches divine initiative. What remains to be demonstrated is whether divine initiative means: secret unconditional selection → irresistible regeneration → inevitable faith → coming Or whether John's language belongs to the much broader biblical pattern: God reveals → God teaches/calls/draws → man hears → faith receives or unbelief hardens → the believer comes to Christ and receives life. And the rest of Scripture makes that distinction extraordinarily difficult to ignore. Paul asks why certain Israelites are outside while believing Gentiles stand. His answer? “Because of UNBELIEF they were broken off, and thou standest BY FAITH.” Romans 11:20 Could those broken-off branches ever enter? “If they abide not still in UNBELIEF, shall be GRAFTED IN: for God is able to graft them in again.” Romans 11:23 That passage deserves far more attention in this debate. UNBELIEF → broken off. FAITH → standing. Not continuing in unbelief → grafted in. Paul does not treat faith and unbelief as irrelevant surface phenomena hiding the “real” distinction somewhere behind the text. They are central to his explanation. And yes, Scripture gloriously teaches election. But notice how Paul describes saving election: “He hath chosen us IN HIM before the foundation of the world.” Ephesians 1:4 The chosen are IN CHRIST. And in that same chapter these believers are described as those who heard “the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation” and believed, and were sealed with the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13). This is why faith cannot simply be dismissed as man's contribution to salvation. Paul explicitly distinguishes it from works: “To him that WORKETH NOT, but BELIEVETH on him that justifieth the ungodly…” Romans 4:5 Faith does not compete with grace. Faith does not manufacture salvation. Faith does not make Christ die. Faith does not raise Christ from the dead. Faith does not regenerate itself. Faith does not contribute one drop to the blood of Calvary. God provides. God promises. God reveals. God calls. God draws. God saves. Faith receives what grace provides. That is the magnificent testimony of Hebrews 11. Noah didn't create the warning or the ark's deliverance. He believed God. Abraham didn't create the promise. He believed God. Israel didn't part the Red Sea. By faith they walked through the path God opened. Rahab didn't defeat Jericho. She believed God and did not perish with those who believed not. This is why Hebrews 11 matters enormously to John 6. Because Scripture has already spent centuries teaching us what it means to come to God. “He that COMETH TO GOD must BELIEVE.” So when Jesus says: “All that the Father giveth me shall COME TO ME,” we must not allow our theology to redefine “coming” in a way that empties the Bible's repeated faith/unbelief distinction of its explanatory force. The question is not whether God is sovereign. He is. The question is whether sovereignty means God secretly determines which individuals will irresistibly believe and which will inevitably remain unbelieving, and then Scripture repeatedly describes the resulting distinction as though faith, unbelief, hearing, hardening, receiving and rejecting were themselves genuinely significant. That mechanism needs to be proved, not smuggled into “giveth.” Because the biblical testimony is remarkably consistent: Abraham BELIEVED. Rahab came BY FAITH. Nineveh BELIEVED GOD. Israel could not enter because of UNBELIEF. The Word did not profit those who heard without FAITH. Those who hear God's voice are warned not to HARDEN their hearts. Men are condemned because Light came and they LOVED DARKNESS. Israel was broken off because of UNBELIEF. Gentiles stand BY FAITH. The broken branches may be grafted in if they do not remain in UNBELIEF. Whoever COMES TO GOD must BELIEVE. And Jesus says: “He that BELIEVETH on me hath everlasting life.” John 6:47 This is not salvation by human merit. This is not autonomous free will rescuing itself. This is God's own order of grace: God speaks. God reveals. God draws. Man hears. Faith receives, or unbelief hardens. The believer comes to Christ. In Christ is life. Perhaps that is why Scripture gave us Hebrews 11 as the great gallery of FAITH. If the true explanatory key were a hidden decree that rendered the faith of one inevitable and the unbelief of another inescapable, it is remarkable how relentlessly Scripture itself keeps pointing us instead to: “BY FAITH…” and “THEY BELIEVED NOT.” So yes: “All that the Father giveth me shall come to me.” Absolutely. But before turning “giveth” into an entire theological system, let Scripture tell us what coming to God means. It already has: “WITHOUT FAITH it is impossible to please him: for he that COMETH TO GOD must BELIEVE.” God did not surrender His sovereignty when He established faith as the means of receiving His Son. He exercised it. And any doctrine of election, drawing, giving, or eternal life must preserve the order God Himself revealed rather than quietly replacing it with another.