You, your cabinet & your voters should be sent to a 3rd world nation with all assets forfeited.

All because Trump is an utter moron. economist.com/united-states/…

Go ‘Merica

Anyone who thinks eu isn’t free vs US, google the last time anyone who was gunned down in broad daylight by the state or has filtration camps where deaths occur with regularity. & if you claim abortion is murder, you should be protesting at these human storage facilities where miscarriages occur daily due to zero healthcare & horrid nutrition. So much so, they ceased counting.

& Trump voters think high means great. No nation, in Trump America, sees US as stable. All have been dumping securities since day one.

RT @PhillipsPOBrien: Latest piece. It’s bad enough that Chinese leadership mocks the US openly in the White House, however the real problem…

Real leadership

Amen. Trump pathetic anti patriots should learn real history. I assure you it is not what propaganda claims. Start by reading your actual founders words

Our voting is SAFE. Ignore Russian propaganda this admin keeps spewing. From 16,000 to 185 to Zero: Trump’s Claims of Illegal Voting in Nevada Fizzle. nytimes.com/2026/09/24/us/po… via @NYTimes

🎩 This really isn't difficult, America. Putin invaded Ukraine. He armed and backed Iran in its war against you. He menaces your NATO allies week in, week out, and does so with a smirk. Yet somehow the man who has done all this is still treated as a partner to be courted rather than an adversary to be contained. That is not statecraft. It is weakness. Churchill, as ever, had the measure of it: "You can always count on Americans to do the right thing, after they have tried everything else." Stay connected, follow @Microinteracti1

Proud @GOP ?

Russia Russia Russia was never a hoax!! Treasonous admin, they should be facing the death penalty. I’m no advocate of a civilized nation having one. But if anyone deserves it, it is this murderous war criminal lowlife admin.

Neither do his voters

I'd encourage everyone to read the Danish military intelligence assessment in full, and not rely on excitable social media upsums. Here is the top line: "The Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS) assesses that Russia will intensify its hybrid war by carrying out more frequent attacks against the West and NATO, with greater consequences for the targeted countries than in the past. This could include destructive cyber attacks that cripple critical societal functions as well as sabotage attacks that carry a high risk of casualties." In other words, Russia will continue doing what it's already doing (terrorist attacks against hard and soft targets, cyberoperations), only more so. This is an uncontroversial assessment across Western intelligence services, so far as I've been able to determine. DDIS continues: "At the same time, there is a low but growing risk that Russia will launch a limited military attack against one or several NATO countries bordering Russia....Such a limited military attack could take the form of isolated strikes with long‑range weapons on infrastructure that is vital to the support to Ukraine. In this situation, Russia might then claim that the weapons only struck NATO territory because they were jammed by Ukraine. It could also be a so-called false flag operation, where Russia uses Ukrainian‑made drones to attack a NATO country." The scenario envisaged here (a low but growing risk) is a plausibly deniable conventional attack by Russia. The objective would be twofold. First, to sow panic and confusion in the targeted country or countries, and encourage skepticism of the official government version of what just happened. "Maybe it was the Ukrainians." "Maybe it was an accident." "Maybe no attack took place and the deep state is trying to foment World War III." Thirty seconds on this hellsite should be enough to convince you that counterfactual narratives would be easy enough to amplify, especially in countries with elections forthcoming. A "limited military attack" psychologically would just be a heightened form of "hybrid" war because it's designed to overwhelm and demoralize the population and make its think that supporting Ukraine just isn't worth it since those not at war are now liable to become collateral damage. The second objective of such an attack would be to gauge NATO's response to it -- and this is key bit, because, as DDIS also states: "Russia will likely carry out military attacks only if it assesses that such attacks will not result in a war by triggering a collective NATO military response. However, Russia is likely uncertain about what could trigger such a war. Consequently, there is a risk that Russia assesses that the NATO countries will not respond collectively, especially if Russia assesses that the United States cannot or will not support the European NATO countries in a potential war against Russia." (Italics added.) You wouldn't be wrong to detect a hint of political messaging here. (All intel services deny they do any such thing but they all do.) This is Denmark, a country that just stared down a possible U.S. invasion and annexation of Greenland, which would have meant the disintegration of NATO. Trump has spent his entire second term (and much of his first term) doubting the Inviolability of Article V. His Pentagon has given NATO allies questionnaires to fill out to prove their worthiness as allies, while it undergoes a force posture review with ominous media leaks about what Bridge Colby and his minion might do (25,000 U.S. troops withdrawn, a scuppered U.S. base in Poland, etc.) Now comes a frenzy of intelligence reporting across Europe about a possible Russian attack on NATO, all kickstarted by a CIA briefing delivered to the Poles, Scandinavians and Balts months ago with a warning that they're probably on their own if and when such an attack happens. Never let a good crisis go to waste... Russia isn't sure what would trigger a war with NATO, so how might NATO make it sure? A "limited military attack" can be deterred if Washington telegraphs its intent to enforce Article V in word and deed by stating clearly and repeatedly what would constitute a casus belli in 2026 and, of course, by keeping U.S. troops in Europe.

🇺🇸‼️ A network of Russian agents supplying Russian software to the Secret Service has been uncovered in the US, - NYP. The CEO of an American technology company, Lee Reiber, has been charged with concealing Russian control over a company that received a US Secret Service contract to supply software. American helped Russian citizens conceal their ownership of Oxygen Forensics so it could receive US government contracts. Prosecutors allege that 55-year-old Reiber conspired with 52-year-old Russian citizen Oleg Davydov to conceal the company's Russian ties and promote its software to US government agencies. If convicted, both men face up to 20 years in prison.

Yet trump supporters clap.

Trump makes Mad king George appear like a modern day statesman.

Tyranny, pure utter stupid tyrant. He would have been labeled one in the 1770s yet anti patriots filled with propaganda voted for tyranny 3x in the 21st century Trump ignored ballroom safety warnings: 'I am the code' piped.video/IWTUPk9AiK8?is=reZZ… via @YouTube

WW3 is close. Less than 2 yrs, probably sooner.

Exactly! Magats attempt to read the Declaration of Independence!! The foundation is clearly laid on natural law!