Josh retweeted
Eminem is not actually a democrat. He has always spoken out against censorship and wokeness (democrat things). He has seen what democrat policies do to cities. So it's weird that he supports democrat candidates, I don't get it.
1
1
30
How people can think that Elon Musk has anything but the best intentions for humanity is beyond me. youtu.be/_j806JHhCRo
2
120
Yeah ... what's going on here? This looks like it's rehearsed, media manipulation. The clip is taken directly from the original: youtu.be/RdxTKM7wHIM?t=1923
WTF???!!! This is insane! NBC made Lindsay Clancy juror Kellie Farina re-answer a question - but they left her initial response in the video! This is at the 32:08 mark in the interview, watch: Interviewer: "Do you think that she should be re-tried?" Farina: "I would like to see her be re-tried, absolutely." Then the interviewer looks off screen and gestures to someone. Was that a signal to edit that part out because they didn't like her answer? Then she stumbles through asking the EXACT same question! Interviewer: "You think, you think, you would like she should be re- re-tried?" Then they cut to another camera shot for Farina to re-answer the question. Farina: "I would like him NOT to re-try her." What is this? They didn't even edit out Farina's initial answer which was that she WOULD like Lindsay to be re-tried! In the span of 10 seconds, you can watch Farina basically say "yes" and "no" to literally the same question. How can we believe anything these jurors say? If a juror answers a question in a way the media doesn't like they make them re-do the question with a different answer? How many other times has this happened? Fake. News. What a disgrace... Link to the interview: youtube.com/watch?v=RdxTKM7w…
1
96
A "wealth tax" is such a dumb, short-sighted, minimal effort concept.
1
72
They're trying to normalize septum rings.
1
59
Gender is, a made-up societal construct. There is no such thing as "gender", only sex -- which is an immutable physical attribute of humans. Gender is completely irrelevant and is only used to group and divide people. For example it is meaningless for a girl to say that they are a boy simply because they like working on the farm, playing with trucks, or because they don't like to wear skirts and dresses. They are still 100% a girl -- why must boys only be allowed to have those characteristics? The traditional term for this is "tomboy", it does not mean the girl is literally a boy -- obviously. The converse example is a boy who says they're a girl simply because they like playing with dolls, or display traits which society reserves for girls. They are still a boy, regardless. Stop grouping and dividing people. Let people portray themselves as they wish. Let them be comfortable in their own, natural bodies without convincing them that they are something they are not. Do not force someone to claim they are "trans" because they like things the opposite "gender" likes, or because they don't prefer things their "gender" prefers. Just as it is okay for men to love women or men and women to love men or women. It is okay for males to act/behave "feminine"; it is okay for females to act/behave "masculine" -- neither action changes the person's sex or their fake / society-assigned "gender".
4
220
Call me a conspiracy theorist if you want, but it seems that the democrats' plan is: 1. Tell people "guns are bad" while ignoring the issues and mental illness behind all violent crimes. Make sure kids (the new generations) are especially scared of guns. 2. Make up terms like "assault weapons" and "gun violence" repeat them over and over until they are common place. 3. Limit which arms people are allowed to purchase or bring across state borders. 4. Continue to claim "guns are bad", and ignore the fact that law-abiding gun owners are inherently not criminals (and only criminals do crimes). 5. As the current older generations phase out, begin soft confiscation because "those old guns your parents left you are no longer safe". 6. Smile as you (governor, mayor, etc.) sign the next big gun ban bill. 7. Confiscate the remaining guns to ensure that the citizenry cannot protect themselves against your tyrannical rule. 8. Enslave everyone but the democrat elites in your socialist utopia aka George Orwell's "1984". Facts: 1. Most gun deaths aren't "gun violence": CDC/Pew data shows ~55-62% of U.S. gun deaths are suicides, ~35% homicides. Homicides have fluctuated but gun homicides dropped significantly post-2021 peak. And law-abiding citizens don't murder people. 2. FBI data consistently shows handguns in the majority of gun homicides, not "assault weapons", which is a political term for semi-automatic rifles with cosmetic features; true machine guns (automatics) are heavily restricted already. 3. Overwhelming evidence shows criminals get guns via theft, black market, or straw purchases, bypassing laws. Studies of felons confirm most avoid legal channels. Law-abiding owners commit a tiny fraction of gun crimes. 4. Many mass shootings involve untreated mental health issues, family breakdown, or cultural factors. Focusing solely on tools ignores root causes like those in non-gun high-violence areas. 5. Guns do not kill people, people kill people. If a would-be criminal cannot access a gun, they can use a bomb, knife, vehicle, etc., or make a home-made improvised "gun". Look at cities and countries that have banned guns and see what the criminals' weapon of choice is there. 6. U.S. violent crime plummeted ~50%+ from early 1990s peaks while gun ownership rose and more states adopted shall-issue concealed carry. Recent spikes (pandemic era) correlated more with policy disruptions, riots, and enforcement changes than gun sales. High-ownership rural states often have lower homicide rates; urban areas with strict laws (Chicago, NYC) can have high rates due to gangs/drugs.
1
4
79
There is no such thing as an "assault weapon". The THING doing the ASSAULT is the PERSON who is wielding whatever weapon it may be: fist, gun, knife, stick, rock, car, sock full of pennies, etc. It's really important that we push back on this "assault weapon" terminology. They are using it, specifically, to disarm law-abiding citizens. This is the goal. The Second Amendment exists so that WE can protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. We cannot do that if we are "not allowed" to have proper weaponry. If we can only own/carry 10 or 15 rounds at a time, what chance would we have against the government who has access to every weapon under the Sun? The Second Amendment requires that citizens be armed appropriately with weaponry which would actually have a chance to help if such a thing was necessary. And it shall not be infringed. @SpanbergerForVA this message is for you, please do the right thing, because we will not comply.
1
80
The entire point of 2A is to ensure that the people can bear arms which they can then use to defend against a tyrannical government. Limiting which weaponry the people can "legally" own is in direct contradiction with 2A. Why are Virginia's legislators making laws which cannot be enforced, since they violate the US Constitution? Why do they continue to push for "gun control" when the only people who are affected by these laws are those who would obey them? How does restricting the type of firearms which law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry help reduce crime and violence? I've been to my local gun shop and range within the past couple of weeks and guess what, they are busy! I asked if they're busier than usual and guess what, they are! I suggest ask Virginians go such up whole you can. Because these laws they're passing are just the beginning. Sic semper tyrannis! @GovernorVA should get to work on changing the Virginia seal and motto as it, apparently, no longer applies. youtu.be/TD6LkxBVqcc
60
Justice has been served. This is great news. youtu.be/DG0ROuSCr04
1
93
Democrat "leaders" create and amplify false narratives which their followers consume with vigor. This propaganda is what fueled Charlie Kirk's murder and the attack at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. The manifesto which was sent beforehand corroborates my theory (linked below). This is what the democrat machine has created. PS: This guy was a teacher in California. 🤦‍♂️
2
72
"The city has been wrestling with what to do about crime there..." Maybe Virginia should crack down on *illegally* owned guns instead of legally owned guns? share.google/qLhMpFuS8a86Q4b…
3
126
New York legislators are now trying to make BB guns, paintball guns, etc. illegal. It never ends. Once we start allowing our rights to be taken, governments will take more and more. youtu.be/pkEaddXTDPE?si=ssYC…
71
“The bank took over the houses and that’s why they ended up here,” Naula said. And what happened before that, and before that? First Principles Thinking. The bank is likely not the cause of this problem. Local (LA) and State policies likely are. ----- Good Samaritan behind ‘Clean LA With Me’ finds couple living in bridge pillar – NBC Los Angeles share.google/ImTwOwVi6u4rXCC…
35