Oh yes they're the great pretenders... Macron, Johnson, Albanese, Morrison, Biden, Starmer, Clinton, Turnbull, Cameron, Rudd, Gillard, Trudeau, Merkel, Ardern, Burnham, Bush, Obama, May, Sunak and the list goes on and on There is nothing worse for democracy than a pretender, and the West has been riddled with them for decades now. They pretend to be patriots, they pretend to be standing up for their party and it’s values, they pretend to represent their constituents. But the sad reality is that on both sides of politics accross the Western world we have had a bunch of liars in power. They get away with it - because their opposition are made up of the same exact thing. You'd have to be pretty simple to believe that diversity - a bunch of different things forced together - could ever be a strength. Division, and diversity come from the same latin root, the politicians and the people behind them know this. It is impossible to have social cohesion when diversity is the stated purpose and goal. The real question is why? Why do they lie? Why do they pretend to stand up for the founding principles of their parties and nations but just don’t, and never will? Because if they told the truth, they would never win an election. Watching Macron attempt to mop up the mess he has made of his country is laughable. Now he is tough on crime. But those crimes are by design. I think it is always the few bad actors among the good that cause the trouble. But the problem is, now, everyone wears the consequences. A more heavy handed state, less free speech, and lower living standards. We are being pushed to third world conditions and that is not an accident. It is totally by design. Because they are not that stupid (well some of them are), and the people behind them in the establishment are doing all of this on purpose. The West and its middle-class is all that stands between the global criminal network, and total world domination, and so they send us liars, cheats and fools, and tell us it is our own fault because we chose them. Hope we don’t see through the lies. The absolute web of falsehood. It permeates out from the centre like a spider and its eight legs. But now that the mask has slipped in Paris it is just a matter of time before we all wake up and put the politics of diversity in the bin of history. A nasty plan, with a sting in the tail, sold as care. It is cruel to everyone but the establishment, there are no other winners. We need people of substance to stand up now, because it is almost too late. I just want Australia back.

France is now understanding what “globalize the intifada” means. Tutt tutt to every single one of you who fell for the anti semitic agitprop and who’s pushed this into every nation in the West. The far left and woke Reich are not your friends - they’re the enemy. They work for globalists they claim to hate. The same globalists who fund extremist Islam and terrorism throughout the West. War is how they make the money that they use to fund terrorism via laundering and fraudulent Govt programs. Go ahead though - keep blaming the jooce.

The hottest day ever officially recorded in Australia, using a standard Stevenson screen at a government weather station, was 125 °F (51.7 °C) on Sunday, 3 January 1909, at Bourke, New South Wales. For decades this was long recognised as Australia’s hottest day. However, it didn’t fit the “global warming” narrative. For if, as alarmists assert that “climate change” is causing unprecedented record heat, how could our hottest-ever day have occurred back in 1909? So just as Orwell described in 1984, the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) rewrote history. "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute ….. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” The BOM’s excuse for erasing this record was that the observer at the Bourke Post Office in January 1909 supposedly made a mistake. "Observer error" someone at the BOM decided from a desk in Canberra a century later. The BOM’s justification for declaring it a “mistake” was the assertion that no nearby weather station recorded a similar temperature spike on the same day, so therefore the 125 °F reading at Bourke must have been an error. But that claim by the BOM is a LIE. Before COVID, I personally visited the Australian National Archives to examine the original handwritten meteorological observation books because I no longer trusted the BOM after some of their earlier data manipulations. The archived observation book from the official weather station at Brewarrina — the nearest official station to Bourke, just 100 km away — recorded a maximum temperature of 50.6 °C (123 °F) on the very same day in January 1909. The hottest temperature ever recorded there. Thus, we had two official government weather stations only 100 km apart both independently recorded extreme heat on the same day: Bourke 125 °F and Brewarrina 123 °F. Game, set, match. The Bourke record must be reinstated and the BOM held accountable for their malfeasance and fraudulent attempt to rewrite our history. One of my regrets is that the human-rights abuses inflicted upon Australians during the COVID years, along with the malfeasance at the TGA, distracted me from pursuing this matter in Parliament further at the time. Any organisation that can so brazenly and fraudulently tamper with historical data, as the BOM has done, simply cannot be trusted. I’d bet London to a brick that the very same people at the BOM who fraudulently altered our climate history have their fingers all over the $100 million of taxpayers’ money they’ve spent “updating their website”. There should be a full investigation into the Bureau of Meteorology. I volunteer to head it.

Paris looking like a war zone yet again. Macron nowhere to be seen.

To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad: Do not blame the French people for this. We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no. Here are the numbers your media won't show you. 70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today. 79% want a tougher immigration policy. 77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration. 83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home. And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years. This is not a fringe. This is the French people. In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again. That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway. So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations. In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders. It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed. What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it. The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did. So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this." The French never chose this. They were forced into it. If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us. If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd. x.com/MisterKraKra/status/21…

‼️Warning for Australia‼️ End result of letting millions of people into your country who hate you and have no intention of assimilating Complete civil unrest and violence in the streets Marseilles France

Let's talk about MISINFORMATION and FAKE NEWS, Anika Wells - Minister for Communication. You said at the National Press Club - and stated as a position of fact: "...where a billionaire can buy a platform and strip it of moderation." This is very clearly a reference to @elonmusk purchasing Twitter. You are a government minister proposing some of the largest fines in the history of social media - and yet you are beginning your objective from a position of untruth. Twitter - now X - was NOT 'stripped of moderation'. X has - and has always had - one of the stricter and more responsive systems of automatic and user-reported community safety guidelines in the industry. X responds faster to complaints than the government - that's for sure. None of these systems disappeared. None of them vanished. To imply that X has been 'stripped of moderation' is to spread misinformation about an individual, their intent, and the company activity for the purpose of justifying a new law with severe financial consequences. What did Elon Musk do that upset the Australian government so much? He made public the previously secret 'takedown orders' made during the Covid pandemic which robbed victims of government policy of their voice. The Australian government - quite literally - tried to silence the injured and bereaved. The government tried to silence information and scientists who disagreed with a political policy that cost lives, broke privacy laws, broke human rights norms, and forever crippled the economy. The government leaned on social media - threatened social media - and made social media complicit in HIDING the serious consequences of their Covid and Climate Change policies. A relationship they obviously want to re-establish via the coercive force of fines. In other words, Elon Musk embarrassed the government and exposed censorial demands that go against public expectation. And the government want it stopped. Elon Musk also removed OVERT POLITICAL CENSORSHIP that had been silencing conservatives online and removing criticism of progressive and left-wing policy and narratives. That is - and in particular - he removed Covid, Climate Change, and biological censorship that was corrupting the truth with political propaganda. Musk REMOVED a layer of political influence from X and in doing so left-wing governments around the world immediately had an angry public on their hands and the consequences are being felt at elections. Anika Wells should be forced to RETRACT and APOLOGISE for her comments and the untruth that she said in front of the National Press Gallery while speaking from a position of power. And if not, let's hope Elon Musk can use this against the Australian government in the future.

For some of us, the fight goes on. Only now it’s with our own government who’re rowing back on promises once made. @mattkeogh’s treatment of Chris is a national disgrace. I undertook pre-deployment training for the last of my operational tours with him and he’s a fine digger who deserves better.

I know I know. X isn’t the real world. Still. The high level of support for free speech on this platform tells you all you need to know about why @AnikaWells @AlboMP are absolutely desperate to censor X.

Here is @AnikaWells brazenly lying about the fake accounts ("sock puppets") provision of the law: She says, "Well, there is nowhere in the bill that gives the government, and by the government, in this instance, the independent regulator, that power. It's just not there." Yes, it is there, as anyone who reads the bill can see. I'll paste it again below.

The Albo-rithm: Please Explain The Albanese Government wants to control the internet. They'll call it safety. It's censorship.

Dear @SecRubio Please ban members of the @AustralianLabor Party who continue to attempt to censure free speech in Aust under the guise of a Govt duty of care. On 9/11 and after, I protected US personnel and facilities in Aust; I now ask the US to return the favour. Ban @AlboMP

Imagine telling people that disagree with you to kill themselves… and then wondering why you have haters… 🤣 He has the IQ of a flea… @pekingduk

Wow, wow, wow. I just left the National Press Club where Minister of Communications @AnikaWells spoke. She repeatedly and brazenly lied about the fake accounts, claiming they were only for enforcement, even though the legislation says in black and white that the eSafety Commissioner can use them in unlimited ways for "educational" and "promotional" purposes. One big moment came when a Politico reporter got up and said something about how mean people like @PaulineHansonOz were to eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant. Seriously. A supposed reporter was white-knighting for a government official during the official Q&A. The same reporter had come up to me before Wells' speech and asked if I had criticized Inman-Grant. Who needs government censors when you have Politico? After he asked his question, Wells showed the most emotion, describing online criticism of Inman-Grant as "abuse." She also talked about her own staff's supposed suffering. I kid you not. The mask dropped, and you could see what really upset her: people — including a sitting Senator — criticizing government officials. After gaslighting the audience about fake accounts, Wells repeatedly insisted the government wasn't trying to censor content. She said this after filling her speech with examples of content she claimed harmed people. You couldn't make it up. This legislation is the culmination of decades of progressives equating words with physical violence. Wells cynically compared her legislation to prevent psychological "harm" to various laws that protect people from physical harm, like seat belt laws. BTW, Wells never said what content it was that she thought caused eating disorders. Pictures of skinny women? Dietary advice? Who knows. Nobody asked. Another important moment came when Wells explicitly said Australia would be pursuing censorship alongside other nations, including the UK, France, and Spain—all countries where governments risk losing power to populists. I spoke with Julie Inman-Grant before the speech began and asked about the fake accounts. She insisted they were there just for enforcement, and when I asked why the law allowed them to be used for government propaganda, she said she might write an "enforcement memo," which, of course, would have no impact on the legislation. After her speech, I went up to Wells and asked if she was seriously saying the legislation didn't allow the government to use fake accounts for government propaganda. She refused to answer. A man who said he was from the National Press Club stepped in front of me and said I could interview her afterward. But that wasn't possible because they rushed her out the back to avoid any difficult questions. So there you have it. The pettiest people in Australia are seeking to silence citizens and their political opponents in the name of protecting children. These deeply intolerant and cynical people want to control what you can see and say online. And they're doing it with most of the media's support. Australia has reached a new low in its rapid descent into dogmatism, intolerance, and censorship.

Let’s make judges accountable! The judicial system needs a complete overhaul! 👏

The government today will introduce sweeping censorship that @AlboMP & @AnikaWells lie about. Below she claims the government wants to create a bot army of fake accounts for “research” when the bill clearly intends for them to be used in partisan warfare against fooled citizens.

I’m glad you asked. First of all, let’s outline the hallmarks of a social contagion event: - A rapid exponential explosion in numbers. - The sudden appearance of an entirely new patient group - Adolescent girls mostly affected. - Clusters of friends presenting with the same symptom/behaviour All of these are present in the epidemic of young people identifying as trans in the 2010s. Now, the way society normally responds to such events is with an immediate search for the trigger event and the vectors for the contagion. For example, with the bulimia contagion of the 80s, the trigger was found to be media coverage of the disorder. With the outbreak of anorexia in Hong Kong in the 90s, it was the sensational media coverage of a school girl who had collapsed and died on a busy street. With TikTok tics in the 2010s, a young Tourettes sufferer’s YouTube channel was swiftly identified. There are endless examples. In those instances, clinicians didn’t wait around for decades for someone to conduct a reliable study showing that the event was a social contagion. They recognised all the hallmarks and acted. In the case of bulimia though, not nearly fast enough. In the case of the trans contagion, all researchers had to do was take a glance at the cultural messaging of the era. The inflection point coincides precisely with the dawn of the trans rights movement, with media celebration of trans-identified public figures, and trans influencers proliferating rapidly on social media. And those early YouTube influencers actually documented the social contagion on camera for all to see with the How I Knew I Was Trans genre of video — with each young person describing encountering a trans-identified person online and immediately recognising themselves in it and adopting the identity. That’s the social contagion in action. We don’t need studies to show it’s a social contagion. We just need to open our eyes and look at the evidence that is, and always has been, all around us.

The girls who walked out of their cross country race in Camas, WA yesterday stand in a long line of women who had to protest to achieve fairness in sports. Below them is a photograph that captures the history of women’s distance running. Six women sat down at the starting line with handmade protest signs to challenge discrimination by the Amateur Athletic Union (AAU). These names are documented in the historical account published by The New York Times and reproduced in the running-history article How Six Women Changed the New York City Marathon Forever. The girls above will also go down in history for protecting the integrity of female sports!

Oi: @Tony_Burke …CUNT! As a 40yr Veteran of both the ADF and the AFP, explain yourself you utter fuckpuppet! Why don’t you just come out of the closet and start wearing Islamic clothing? As a Veteran, I call you a traitor to the Australian people and to Australian values!!