Re "notification mechanism, I can't stop thinking about this point
@mattsheehan88 made recently: maybe it should be via fax. Sounds crazy, but read his argument -
> Matt: We have had a lot of these crisis communication lines on military issues, and the U.S. complaint is always: Oh, the Chinese side doesn’t pick up the phone when we call them.
And that’s a real issue. I think one mitigation to that is — somewhat ironic — not to use a phone but to use a fax machine.
>Ezra: Literal faxes?
> Matt: Literal faxes. It has a logic to it, too. Because the political system there is not a system of empowered individuals. It’s a system of committees and a system of documents.
So when our treasury secretary — someone who feels very empowered on the U.S. side — picks up the phone and is like: Give me some answers, He Lifeng — or other Chinese counterpart — they’re kind of like: Eh, not really ready to give you answers on the fly.
Much better to send a document over to their system that they can review, they can bring it to their committee, they can come up with their understanding and response and send something back.
So something in that vein, that at least puts a little bit of a safety net on these incidents that — I think something like that is pretty likely to happen in the next year.
(from
nytimes.com/2026/09/15/opini… )
On a potential AI slowdown, Treasury Sec. Bessent said that the U.S. and China discussed a mechanism called the U.S.-China AI dialogue and have agreed to meet again.
The U.S. proposed a notification mechanism between the two countries and “we want a shared vision of common goals and threats.”
The notification system for incidents would be whether something rises up to the national security level from AI.
“We think that just like any cross-border activity, moving from opaque to more transparency between the number one and number two AI powers in the world is very important.”
U.S. trade representative Jamieson Greer said that U.S. chip export controls were not on the agenda.