THE TRUTH ABOUT PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION
That infamous forgery, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” which attained notoriety in Nazi propaganda during the 1930s, had its origins in the attempt by the Anglo-Dutch financial oligarchy to discredit Russia’s Count Sergei Witte in the eyes of Tsar Nicholas II, and ultimately, to overthrow the Witte coalition.
Nicholas carried with him all the backwardness of the Russian aristocracy, including violent anti-Semitism, but had very few of the strengths manifested by his father, Alexander III, and his grandfather, Alexander II, that admirer of Abraham Lincoln, and liberator of the serfs.
Suspicions of a “world Jewish conspiracy” would play well in the paranoid psyche of the Tsar and his wife, Alexandra, the superstitious, hysterical former Princess Alix of Hesse-Darmstadt, granddaughter of England’s Queen Victoria.
But the scene of the concoction was Paris, and one of the key players was the infamous Peter Ivanovich Rachkovsky, specialist in the use of agents provocateurs and director of the Foreign Agency of the Okhrana (secret police) in 1885-1902.
Like most of the Okhrana command, Rachkovsky was part of a faction of the Russian elite that wanted, for its own reasons, to bring down the Romanov dynasty if they couldn’t control it, and collaborated with British imperial interests on that and other geopolitical projects.
Among other things, British strategists welcomed EIR on September 23, 2005, which was even facilitated by the leaders of the Tsar’s own security service, men who profoundly opposed the modernization of Russia, which threatened to break the power of the landed feudal oligarchy.
Several of them were direct collaborators of the British Balkan Wars project in the 1870s, as well.
In the aftermath of the assassination of Alexander II, this same grouping created a secret society called the Holy Brotherhood, ostensibly to do a better job of protecting the monarch.
The Holy Brotherhood would spawn the Okhrana secret police agency, which would be pivotal in fomenting the events leading to the Russian Revolution.
"Zubatov and ‘Police Socialism of the key figures who would be unleashed against Witte and the modernizers was an Anglophile police agent, Sergei Zubatov.
In 1896, despite the fact that he had been earlier jailed for terrorist activities, Zubatov was appointed chief of the Russian secret police, the Okhrana, in Moscow.
The Okhrana had been founded by Count N.P. Ignatiev, a military commander of the Russian forces during the first Balkan Wars of 1875-78, which had been orchestrated from London.
Ignatiev’s close collaborator, V.P. Meshchersky, was Zubatov’s immediate patron, securing him the Moscow post.
Meshchersky was also a literary patron of Fyodor Dostoevsky, who propagandized for the Balkan wars, and of the German philosopher of nihilism, Friedrich Nietzsche.
Zubatov absorbed these philosophical views into his police work.
Prior to taking the Moscow post, Zubatov had spent a Dozen years conducting police infiltration of the various leftist and socialist groups that had proliferated inside Russia. He was an avid reader of British Fabian Society literature, and frequently used the writings of Sidney Webb as recruiting tools for his own “revolutionary cells.
”Zubatov spelled out his plans in an 1898 memo to another Moscow police official: “While a revolutionary advocates pure socialism, he can be dealt with by means of repressive measures alone, but when he begins to exploit for his purpose the rise of anti-Semitism in the Russian Empire, which could drive Russian Jews to emigrate to Palestine, potentially to become British puppets there.
Rachkovsky was experienced in forgeries, as was his specialist in such matters, Matvei Golovinsky, who is reputed to be the real author of the Protocols.
The anti-Semitic circles that had launched the Dreyfus case in France, helping to keep France and Germany at loggerheads, continuously spread rumours about a Jewish conspiracy, especially blaming Jewish banking circles in France and Germany.
The Paris salon of Juliette Adam was a hotbed of this racist propaganda.
Active in the Adam salon was one Elie de Cyon (Ilya Faddeyevich Tsion), a converted Russian Jew who had become an ardent Slavophile, and had for a time worked in Witte’s Finance Ministry in St. Petersburg. Later in Paris, however, he became Witte’s bitterest enemy, writing tracts about how Witte was a pawn of the Rothschilds, although Witte’s Russia received only a modicum of support from their bank.
Another anti-Semite who attacked Witte in Paris was Edouard Drumont, who attacked Witte for his support of the gold standard and accused him of “maintaining the entire world under the yoke of the great Jews.”
A key player in the Dreyfus Affair, Drumont was also instrumental in bringing down the French Foreign Minister, Gabriel Hanotaux, who was Witte’smain collaborator in establishing the alliance with France.
The“Protocols”are presented as the minutes of a series of meetings of a secret Jewish-Masonic group.They elaborate the method by which the Jews, through their growing financial power, will come to be the masters of the world and project that monarchies and Christian society will both be destroyed.
The general model for the forgery was an 1860s tract by another French anti-Semite, Maurice Joly, entitled “The Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.” These texts began appearing in France in the 1890s, but not in Russia until 1902.
It was rumored then that the new Tsar would appoint the obscurantist priest Sergei Nilus as his confessor. Nilus would inform Nicholas about the “Protocols”in order to provoke a final break between the Tsar and Witte.
Nilus published a full edition of the Protocols in 1905, the year in which revolution hit Russia—presaged by the Okhrana networks’ 1902-03 mass strikes in Odessa, and fueled by the Russo-Japanese War that Witte’s enemies had unleashed. When Witte called his friend Henrik Sliosberg,a leader of the Jewish community in St. Petersburg, to ask him about the Protocols, Sliosberg indicated to him that the publication was aimed not so much at the Jews, as at the opposition in Russia, and, especially, Witte himself.
The 20th Protocol, in particular, warned that the introduction of the gold standard would be a harbinger of the destruction of the nation, a direct reference to Witte’s move to strengthen the ruble.While they had been introduced through Russian emigre´ circles into Germany after the1917 Bolshevik Revolution, the Protocols received their greatest publicity in an editorial in the Times of London in May 1920, which spoke of the “Jewish peril.” This would predate by three years the 1923 study of the “Protocols” by the Baltic German fascist ideologue Alfred Rosenberg, whose work would then become a mandatory part of the Nazi arsenal—with the most horrendous consequences.—William JonesHere is an even more elaborated story of the protocols if you wish to check:
docs.google.com/vie...