Trans women are women. What do you have against skirts?? Are you misogynistic?
6
4
163
How are men, women? The only prerequisite to being a transwoman is to be a man. I love a skirt, but it’s not a skirt that makes me a woman.
1
7
150
No one said a skirt made me a woman. Gender incongruence is a born condition. You tell me what is a woman?
2
1
4
163
I asked you first. You’re the one saying some men are women. Tell us, please, what makes some men, women?
1
4
133
I'm asking you what makes a woman a woman. I already told you what validates trans women as women.
2
3
153
Woman = adult human female
1
6
134
Sure. And woman = tall women, short women, white women, black women, trans women and c!s women. All women are women.
4
183
Woman = adult human female, tall female, short female, black female.
2
5
176
What defines a female?
3
162
Not a male
1
2
133
What defines a male
4
1
1,293
Love how they wouldn't answer the question
1
1
129
I did a female is not a male, and vice versa, I’m glad you love it
2
2
98
That's not what defines a female
1
1
94
What do you think is the definition of the term female then ?
1
2
101
Females are defined by their reproductive systems, large gametes, chromosomes, hormones, & phenotypes. Trans women who medically transitioned have both female hormones & phenotypes, NOT male. So that alone deviates them from being male ^
2
2
113
This is less of a definition and more of a list of traits that correlate with being female. This doesn't work as a definition because there are females without these traits. With chromosomes, there's females with DSDs and females of other species with different sex chromosomes.
1
3
94
Beyond that, you're using your explanation to make the argument that "trans women" are female and not male, but they also do not have many of the characteristics that you claimed define what it means to be female. The first three don't apply, so they'd have less than half.
1
3
105
You're debating the meaning of something that's already well-understood. Both "woman" and "female" have existing definitions. You're also arguing that humans can change sex, but we're gonochorists, known for our specific inability to change sex.
1
5
165
What about any of that entitles you to tell women they must be men? You do realize that your inaccurate history of words doesn't obligate anyone to cater to your opinions, right? Semantics don't change reality, sweety. Reality is, other people's sex and gender are nunya.
2
1
131
Why are you assuming that they're women? The history of words tells us that we've always created words to distinguish between the sexes.
2
2
120
But none of that survives on little problem (for you.) Semantics don't entitle you do dictate what other people's sex an gender is. And historically speaking, "its always meant our definition" is complete claptrap.
4
1
175
Appealing to definitions is also a fallacy
4
2
139
Truth! Words are a medium of communication. We should know the definitions so we are clear in our speech. TERFs do the opposite. They deliberately confuse definitions so they can make broad statements that sound functional, but slime between polysemes to muddy the discourse.
1
1
129
Hahahaha Okay, so what makes a person a woman then?
2
1
132
Whether if they're an adult human whose gender identity aligns with their internal schemas on the female sex
3
2
137
So you think we've defined woman as an adult human who thinks that they're the female sex even if they're not, rather than defining woman as an adult human who is actually the female sex?
1
4
79
I don't think "you" or "we" defined woman is such way. I merely provided my definition of a woman
3
88
Also, thank you for admitting that this is a personal definition and not one that society agrees with. So why should society accept this definition?
1
4
80
I admitted this is a personal definition, yes, which does not equate "not one that society agrees with".
4
1
84
How could society agree with it if it's a personal definition?
1
2
70
I mean society didn't agree with Galileo at first now here we are
1
1
86
Yeah but there is no evidence for your position. It's purely based on narcissism. "I'm a woman if I claim to feel like one. I'm a woman if I say that I feel like the female sex even though I, a male, have no ability to actually know what it feels like to be female."
3
6
106
There actually are. Like studies that prove that trans people's brain scans match those of c!s people of their gender. I don't know where you got narcissism from, looks like an off topic headcanon of yours.
2
105
Hahaha no, no such studies exist. Some studies have shown that portions of their brains are close to those of the opposite sex (similar to gay people), but their brain still mostly aligns with their biological sex. Nice try. At best, this identifies the cause for their gender dysphoria.
1
6
136
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
As I said, at best transwomen's brains are still closer to the male sex, so why would this make them women?
1
10
130
In order to talk about trans women, the minimum required would be to use the right term. All you're highlighting is the fact that gender is a spectrum and not a binary
3
121
Peer reviewed debunking below
Everybody knows the famous Kurth et al., 2022 study (cited below) about “brain-sex” in transgender women being shifted to their “gender identity”. Colin Wright (@SwipeWright), Adam Rochussen (@AdamRochussen), and myself wrote a post-publication peer-review discussing the methodological and statistical issues with this famous paper. It’s now been published! Read below! 💪🏼
9
115
If you want to go look for every neurobiologistic study on the matter have fun doing it, I'm not to inform you on the topic you pretend to be more knowledgable
2
99
Also you keep conflating gender and sex which automatically voids your argument. Nice try.
1
1
98