I'm sure the vast majority of the country supports this view. Then abortion became a form of birth control and you should be able to have one for any reason but still only in the first it maybe second trimester. Most people probably support this too.

Excellent read: Captain Kelly Forgot What the Rank Required: When Residual authority turns into political theater 👁️🧠🧐 Captain Mark Kelly wants you to know he spoke to a grandmother today. Her 21-year-old grandson is aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. The kid has dropped 20-25 pounds and is fighting depression. Kelly’s conclusion: so-called leaders like Pete Hegseth aren’t doing a damn thing about it. That is the whole play. A sitting senator who still leans on the title “Captain” turns a private family worry into a public political strike. He treats the existence of strain itself as proof of failure higher up the chain. A captain’s job was never to serve as the fleet’s public grief counselor. It still isn’t. Kelly is not that sailor’s division officer, his chaplain, or his corpsman. He is a politician wearing residual rank like a costume. The second he decided to broadcast one grandmother’s concern as evidence of institutional neglect, he stopped operating as an officer and started operating as every other partisan hunting soft targets. Look at how the same problem was handled when the cost of failure was measured in bodies instead of headlines. Private Eddie Slovik walked away from his unit in France in 1944. The Army did not issue a press release about his mental state. It court-martialed him, convicted him of desertion, and executed him by firing squad in January 1945. The only American soldier put to death for desertion since the Civil War. The message was simple and final: the mission continues. General Patton walked into a hospital ward in Sicily in 1943, found a soldier crying that he could not take it anymore, called him a coward in front of the other patients, slapped him, and ordered him back to the line. The political class lost its mind. The men still fighting did not. Patton’s premise was never seriously contested by the ones who had to keep moving: once you are in, the job does not pause for your nerves. Kelly’s version runs the opposite direction. He treats the sailor’s condition as an automatic indictment of leadership. That framing assumes the primary duty of command is to prevent or rapidly erase the psychological cost of the work. Armies have always produced men who lost weight, stopped sleeping, and stared at bulkheads. The real question was whether the unit could still function under pressure. Kelly is free to push for better screening, more resources, or different policies. Managing these cases is part of modern military life. What he is not free to do while still trading on the word “Captain” is pretend that turning one family’s private worry into a partisan attack constitutes leadership. It does not. It is political theater performed in borrowed authority. A captain’s duty was to keep the ship and its crew effective when the pressure rose. Consolation was never the primary mission. Kelly has either forgotten that distinction or decided it no longer applies to him. Either way, the performance is beneath the rank he once held. —Mars Lewis Share this if you still understand the difference between command and performance. And support the work following the link below. 🙏 buy.stripe.com/6oUfZi7sz12yb… #MarkKelly #PeteHegseth #MilitaryLeadership #ResidualRank #MissionFirst .

🇺🇸 @SecRubio: “As we commemorate 250 years of independence, I call on our allies and embassies around the world to join us in celebrating the American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Happy Independence Day, and may God bless the United States of America.”

As a veteran, I approve this message 100%! Thank you to all my fellow brothers and sisters in arms 🫡🇺🇸 Happy Memorial Day ! Veterans before illegals .. Say “Yes” & Repost if you agree!

Whose rhetoric has contributed MOST to the current climate of political violence in America?

🚨 UNHITTABLE Book Giveaway 🚨 1/1 copy signed in Gold Pen ✍️ To enter: • Repost = 1 Entry • Quote Post why you want the book = 2 Entries Winner chosen at random. ⏰ Ends Monday (3/16) at 2pm ET Pre-order Unhittable here: a.co/d/0iaJP2b8

OH HELL TO THE FUCK NO... Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson...sworn guardian of the Constitution, life-tenured arbiter of the nation’s highest laws...chose last night to plant herself in the front-row glitter of the Grammys, a celebrity circus where politics is performed louder than music. She was there, nominally, because her audiobook memoir earned a nomination. But nominations are trivial. What mattered was the moment the arena turned into a political rally. When the performer shouted “ICE out!”...a direct, unambiguous demand to abolish the federal agency charged with enforcing immigration law and protecting the border...the room detonated into a standing ovation. Hollywood’s richest, most insulated activists leapt to their feet in ritualistic fury, applauding the open contempt for statutory law, for sovereignty, for the orderly process of immigration that millions of legal applicants respect. And Justice Jackson rose with them. She did not remain seated in dignified silence. She did not withhold her hands. She stood and clapped in solidarity with a mob celebrating the dismantling of laws she is constitutionally obligated to uphold without favor or fear. This was not passive attendance. This was active, visible endorsement. A Supreme Court Justice publicly signaled her approval of lawlessness on an issue that has repeatedly...and will continue to...come before her Court in the form of emergency docket applications, statutory interpretation cases, and constitutional challenges to executive enforcement authority. 28 U.S.C. § 455 demands recusal whenever a justice’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned. The Supreme Court’s own 2023 Code of Conduct explicitly requires justices to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety, including political activity that undermines public confidence in judicial independence. By standing and applauding a call to abolish a federal law-enforcement agency, Jackson has shredded both the statute and the Code. Any reasonable observer would now question her ability to rule dispassionately on any immigration-related case. Recusal is no longer optional; it is mandatory. Yet everyone who has watched her jurisprudence knows she will not recuse. She will sit, she will vote, and she will cloak ideological preference in the language of “equity” and “empathy.” The psychology here is almost painfully obvious. High-status environments trigger a primal need for belonging. Surrounded by cultural royalty showering approval on radical posturing, the temptation to signal membership in the elect is overwhelming. Standing ovations are dopamine theater; they reward conformity and punish restraint. For a justice already accused of letting policy preferences bleed into opinions, this was less a lapse than a revelation: the same impulse that drives performative virtue on a Sunday night stage drives result-oriented reasoning on the bench. Justices are not private citizens. They surrender certain freedoms the moment they don the robe. They do not attend partisan rallies. They do not lend their prestige to political causes. They do not stand and cheer the abolition of laws they may soon be asked to interpret. Past justices understood this intuitively...Warren, Burger, Rehnquist, even Ginsburg in her later years maintained a careful distance from overt political theater. Jackson has now crossed a line none of them crossed. This is disqualifying. Not merely embarrassing. Not merely inappropriate. Disqualifying. The integrity of the Court hangs by thinner threads with every passing term. When a justice publicly celebrates contempt for the rule of law, the damage is not repaired by a perfunctory statement from the Public Information Office. Confidence erodes. Legitimacy frays. Remove her. Restore the Court. Reclaim the Constitution from ideological capture. The republic cannot afford another term of this. 💀⚖️

RT @mbdat19k: @zellieimani I firmly believe that your rhetoric incites violence. Using your logic, I would be justified to inflict violence…

Definitely broken iq-checker.xyz/mbdat19k

Waiting on my retweet Tubby. I think it's important the world see what a pathetic excuse for a man you are.

😬

This is a weird flex considering you posted in English and not German thanks to the U.S.

Repeal the NFA. Abolish the ATF. RT if you agree!

What a disgusting POS