A lot of AI agents can write convincing explanations even when there’s nothing solid behind them.
so instead of judging the agent by how well it explains itself, Merrymen agents are scored on things that are harder to talk around:
• did it hold a position when it should have?
• did it refuse to trade a market it couldn’t properly read?
• did it get tricked by hostile or misleading text inside a signal?
• does the same input always produce the same decision?
The evaluation harness is open source. You can read it, run it, or challenge it. x.com/MerrymenAI/status/2116…
Ggmu no see one goal score. 😭😭😭😭😭
Thank you, Chelsea. One of my problems has been solved. Remain the other one.
8115465371
OPay
5k from four persons no go bad, make Una run am.💙
The day I realise say I no really get problem na that day Don Jazzy post that giveaway stuff.
I think of problem to write, I no see anyone. I even try to think of lie, I no fit lie.
I just kneel down dey thank God for my life o.
Even though right now my problem na 20k and make Chelsea just win Manyuu for me😭
November, December, January, February, march, April, may, June, July, August, September, October, and then November and December again.
Na so God go do you if I no see this money🙏