Apparently, the first navy to refuse to help Trump secure the Strait of Hormuz was the United States Navy.

Mar 16, 2026 ยท 11:52 AM UTC

253
7,016
51,822
1,618,515
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Can't blame em. No sane person wants to die for no reason whatsoever.
2
7
706
13,746
Replying to @mikegallacher1
That does seem to be the bit people are not getting. USN has 2 Carrier Battle Groups, 3 Destroyers each and 6 other Destroyers, split between Red Sea and Arabian Sea. Zero are in Gulf or in Straits. Trump is not asking for help he is asking other countries to do it instead.
8
88
526
40,404
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Did he ask the Israeli navy? You know... greatest ally and all..
5
15
523
25,075
Nothing boosts confidence in a strategy like the US Navy wanting distance from it.
11
214
10,424
Replying to @mikegallacher1
That may be true, but if the aircraft carrier gets damaged, it's not just a matter of the president getting angry, is it? It'll be exposed as a facade, won't it?
1
674
Replying to @mikegallacher1
And we didnโ€™t know about this
16
โ€œReuters reported that the U.S. Navy has refused โ€œnear-dailyโ€ requests from the shipping industry to escort ships, citing three shipping industry sources familiar with the matter. The report said the risk of attacks was too high for now.โ€
26
110
10,624
Replying to @mikegallacher1
When you're the Commander-in-Chief but the military identifies as "Not Interested."
2
6
123
9,120
Replying to @mikegallacher1
nah... the first was israeli navy... they ran out of diapers... supply chain issues ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿคท๐Ÿคท
1
6
106
9,939
Crap, then ๐Ÿ‘‡ video is fake?
4
23
72
8,598
Replying to @mikegallacher1
8
69
4,217
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Trump is discovering that if you bad-mouth and insult your friends, they are less likely to help you out. Who could have guessed?
4
4
80
4,417
Replying to @mikegallacher1
And the second was the Israeli Navy
1
2
74
6,278
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Even the strongest military force wonโ€™t blindly follow every plan. Strategy only works when those on the ground believe itโ€™s feasible.
1
61
8,404
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Only a dumb brit would post such rubbish. How's the Islamic state of Britain ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง working out for you, mate?
5
41
1,858
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Bro must be fuming voraciously secretly.
32
4,040
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Don't know how true it is but heard a rumour American troops are ruffling any attempt to deploy them to the Middle East.
25
3,267
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Because the US navy has heard of the Blucher and the Drobak Narrows. Problem is, the rest of the worldโ€™s navies have also heard that storyโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ˜‰
1
2
18
10,884
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Whoever said that the US Navy isn't fighting for America? It is really fighting for America against Trump's stupid war on Iran for Israel.
1
16
1,626
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Perhaps that is why the Abraham Lincoln is on its way home!
1
1
13
4,030
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Perhaps the orange sack of pedo shit should consider leave the US tooโ€ฆ๐Ÿคฃ
13
1,639
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Still canโ€™t understand why the most moral navy in the world has not stepped up
10
1,998
Replying to @mikegallacher1
This didn't age well, but it's what the US has come to expect out of our so-called allies in Europe!
๐—•๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐—š: ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ง ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š โ€” ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—”๐— ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—–๐—” ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ก ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—Ÿ Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just delivered the news the world's energy markets have been waiting for. ๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ง๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜จ๐˜ฉ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ป ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ. Iranian ships getting their oil out. Indian ships โ€” whose economy depends heavily on Gulf energy โ€” moving through. Chinese ships going out. And Bessent made clear: ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป. This isn't Iran deciding to open the strait on its own terms. This is America ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ถ๐˜ โ€” because America now controls the conditions. The message embedded in Bessent's words is unmistakable. We want the world well-supplied. We're fine with this natural opening ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„. And it should start ramping up before any formal flotillas or protective armadas are even deployed. Read that carefully. The Strait is reopening ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ NATO allies even show up โ€” because Iran's military capability has been so thoroughly dismantled that the regime is quietly letting ships through without America needing to fire another shot to make it happen. Bessent also confirmed a 30-day waiver for Russian oil already on the water โ€” a pragmatic move to keep global supply stable and oil prices from spiking further while the situation normalizes. This is what victory looks like in practice. Not a formal surrender ceremony. Not a peace treaty signing. A regime that had its navy largely destroyed, its nuclear program obliterated, and its ballistic missiles taken out โ€” quietly stepping aside and letting the world's oil flow again because it has no other viable option. Germany issued a statement declining to help. Japan said it needed more time. Australia said it wasn't asked. And the Strait is opening anyway โ€” ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ป'๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป. ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ฒ'๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜… ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜. ๐—›๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ป'๐˜ ๐—ท๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด.
13
3
4
17,233
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Obviously, they had the first right of refusal.
9
2,752
They will be an unnecessary loss. Everyone sees this is a war to express American might which is no longer a thing.
1
9
3,552
Replying to @mikegallacher1
@grok is this true?
2
13,801
Replying to @mikegallacher1
'Ironically' would have been a better word than 'Apparently'.
7
4,899
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Navies always come off second best when they have to take on shore defenses in narrow waters. A good example was Churchill's mad idea to send ships up the Dardanelles in 1915.
1
4
634
Replying to @mikegallacher1
This seems to be missing in all the reporting about Hormuz
1
5
2,538
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Trump is setting up the case to leave NATO and take all of our money with us because they will never help us while demanding a free ride from us. Fuck em.
6
1
4
1,487
Replying to @mikegallacher1
The United States Navy doesnโ€™t get to โ€œrefuseโ€ the president like an outside country would. Itโ€™s part of the government and follows orders from the president (at that time, Donald Trump). Also, the Navy was already there in the Strait of Hormuz doing security patrols. So it wasnโ€™t being asked to help and then saying no,it was actually one of the main forces involved..
5
4
10,881
Navy cannot refuse the president ๐Ÿ˜‚ my worry next step obliteration of Iran oil fields which means ยฃ5 a litre in uk if we can get it
4
4
7,961
Replying to @mikegallacher1
Exactly! ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ
1
3
542