By this weak logic attributed, as usual, to "anonymous sources," one could argue that everyone is coordinating with Sana'a. After a brief confrontation, the United States preferred to end the battle and sign an agreement with Sana'a.Similarly, Israel turned a blind eye to many of Sana'a's strikes out of fear of expanding the confrontation and opening new fronts while facing Iran, Hezbollah, and certain resistance factions in Iraq. Saudi Arabia likewise signed an agreement in 2022. You could take all of these examples and attribute them to unknown sources to "prove" that Sana'a is coordinating with everyone against everyone.
As for the alternative approach which involves relying on facts, official statements, battle outcomes, and the steadfastness of fighters in Sa'ada since 2004, the inception of the Ansar Allah movement, which came to power in Sana'a in 2014, sparking the international aggression led by Saudi Arabia, the US, the UAE, and dozens of other nations you would realize that the reality is far simpler than the contradictions and complexities spun by your "anonymous sources."
Simply put, Sana'a has emerged as a promising regional power carrying a project to liberate Yemen and reshape the face of the region. It seeks to do so by supporting all free people who reject American hegemony, and by confronting anyone who wishes to maintain American and Israeli dominance over the seas, straits, and resources of Arabs and Muslims.
This is no longer a secret; it is clear to everyone, and the battlefield remains open. Whoever chooses to confront Sana'a will face it until they realize that remaining is futile. The retreat of enemy fighters before the ranks of Sana'a those who possess a vision and a just cause will only confirm this reality. At that point, people like you will resort to belittling Sana'a's steadfastness and downplaying the flight of its enemies, inventing cheap, dramatic theories that fail to meet even the standard of the political reports we unfortunately read here.