Retired Special Forces Coronel John Matrix. Pronombres: My Lord / Su Alteza / Mi Chingón

Mexico City
Thus, you should never sacrifice what you could be for what you are. You should never give up the better that resides within for the security you already have. - JP
3
755
One of the problems with today’s climate of rising antisemitism is that it empowers maggots like this to crawl out of their holes in broad daylight.
13
Bryce Young, franchise quarterback. Didn’t have that in my bingo card.
47
If your tweet managed to anger both liberal white women and conservative white men, you’ve done the Lord’s work here on x.com.
As a man, if you were rightly horrified by women defending Lindsay Clancy, but now you're defending the Cornell gang rape, you're both a scumbag and an idiot. You didn't have principles. You had a team. Same blind tribalism.
1
1
301
As a man, if you were rightly horrified by women defending Lindsay Clancy, but now you're defending the Cornell gang rape, you're both a scumbag and an idiot. You didn't have principles. You had a team. Same blind tribalism.
481
14
124
26,823
And to all the dimwits commenting on this post, just like every man should get as far as they can from any woman idiotically cheering on Lindsay Clancy, every women should run, not walk, the hell away from every last one you. Bunch of dumbass, entitled frat boys
24
1
4
3,119
Oigan y a todo esto, en qué momento murió la palabra “fulano”?
1
1
93
Datos.
The most striking chart I’ve seen in a while
2
126
Haz lo correcto. Sufre las consecuencias.
EXCLUSIVE: The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial had a history of domestic violence allegations, the NBC10 Boston Investigators have learned through court documents and interviews with family members. Read the full investigation here. on.nbcboston.com/FL2Wbjr
Community note
Massachusetts law prohibits anyone “to engage in an act directed at a [juror] that seriously alarms or annoys such person” with a penalty of up to 10 years imprisonment. mass.gov/info-details/m…
43
Para los que quieren informarse mejor sobre el caso de Lindsay Clancy, esto es lo mejor que he leído al respecto. 👇
I avoided commenting on the Lindsay Clancy trial because its nuanced and emotional but the implications are enormous so I am going to say something now. A lot of people are calling that one juror who wouldn't join the other eleven irrational. But, that juror is probably the only one asking the right questions imo: where is the evidence that she lacked the capacity to know it was wrong or to stop herself? And, maybe, where do we draw the line on what an ostensibly insane person is allowed to do when the doubt the defense manufactured rests on nothing in the record before the killings? It seems that the entirety of the defense position rests on improbable probabilities and that's a low bar for such a heinous act. 1. Postpartum psychosis is rare, and almost always happens in the first 4 weeks. The idea that some psychiatrists extend the postpartum window to a year is true, but for depression and anxiety. The evidence isn't strong for psychosis, and its latching on to improbability 2. The strongest risk factor for postpartum psychosis is preexisting bipolar disorder or a prior psychotic episode. She had neither before her third child. The real time evidence from her doctors/providers indicate this. The bipolar label that showed up was after significant polypharmacy, and any good psychiatrist will tell you that you cannot diagnose primary disease when multiple drugs could be offending agents. Drug-induced psychosis would show better temporal correlations with her medications and should be a mitigation argument at sentencing. Again, very improbable alignment 3. The proxy for intent is planning, and she clearly planned... she sent her husband to some restaurant they don't normally go to, checked the drive time, texted a specific order at 5:07 pm... she killed her children in sequence. That's demonstrating real time decision making. I don't understand how they circumvented this. Again, very improbable that she was able to make decisions up until it becomes a liability 4. This idea of a "voice" that commanded her is so post-hoc as a defense. The ltierature on command hallucinations show most people don't obey them and the compliance occurs when the voice is familiar. This was a first time voice she only ever reported 2 weeks after killing her kids. And this first time voice asked her to... kill all her children AND she listened to this unfamiliar voice? Again... very improbable The improbability is so stark that it's almost undeniably a sympathy verdict from the jurors conflated with a misunderstanding of postpartum disease. The easiest way to demonstrate this is to take a father with the same chart, months of documented depression, insomnia, suicidal ideation but no psychosis then strangles his kids after arranging for his wife to be away from the house. 100% guilty. Everyone knows postpartum disease is real and important. Everyone knows she's sick and needed help, possibly much better management. You can even argue she is insane. What I see to be the most important is where we draw the line of what we allow under the "insanity" rule. Massachusetts forces a binary verdict of guilty or not criminally responsible but this is a case for the third that other states have and which is guilty but mentally ill. We have a responsibility to speak for the unheard voices of these children and future children and say we draw the line at murdering children.
1
63
Para sorpresa de absolutamente nadie en todo el puto universo.
BREAKING: 38-year old woman from 🇺🇸 Frankfort, Illinois, has been charged with murder of her two-year old son, with court documents claiming she had 'become very invested' in Lindsay Clancy murder trial.
1
1
2
98
Mistrial en el juicio de Lindsay Clancy. 11 jurados (nueve mujeres y dos hombres) intentaron por todos los medios llegar a un veredicto de inocencia, pero el último de ellos (hombre) no cambió jamás su voto de culpable. Héroe.
1
5
44
9,311
Por si necesitaban una razón más para ver la nueva serie de Harry Potter.
Recordatorio que si consumen esto de manera legal le dan dinero a la autora para seguir financiando campañas de odio contra las mujeres trans.
1
40
Cuando pasamos de “los mismos derechos sin importar el género” a esto?
El feminismo te vende que podes con TODO menos con un embarazo
44
Nada más hace falta Rick Grimes y tenemos para un episodio de The Walking Dead. instagram.com/reel/Dcgs8XjgW…
22
Aaah the fatter, uglier cousin of white guilt, Western Guilt.
Nepal produces one tenth of one per cent of the world’s emissions and was ranked the 6th most climate-affected country on Earth in 2024. We did this.
1
3
7
2,323
Esta persona compara la invasión ilegal de 60 mil marroquíes en Ceuta con “los turistas que vinieron a España en junio”. Qué pedo con la izquierda mundial. Como es posible que sigan perdiendo personas valiosas y se queden con puro retrasado(a) mental. Increíble.
Si a la derecha le molestan unas miles de personas que llegan a Ceuta buscando una vida mejor, pero no les molestaron 350.000 ucranianos que llegaron huyendo de la guerra, ni 10M de turistas que vinieron a España en junio, no les preocupa nuestro país, simplemente son racistas.
Community note
Equiparar la entrada ilegal y forzada de decenas de miles de personas ocurrida en Ceuta con cualquier cantidad de turistas, con visado, o refugiados, con permiso de residencia, es intelectualmente deshonesto. La base es la legalidad del acto y no la procedencia del individuo. inclusion.gob.es/web/migraciones
41
Esto es de lo más culero que he leído en mi vida. Hay un lugar especial reservado en el infierno para las mujeres que están culpando a Patrick Clancy de la muerte de sus tres hijos.
Patrick Clancy’s 911 call is devastating. My heart breaks for him. 911 Dispatcher: Explain how she tried to commit suicide. (multiple voices are heard) Where is she now? Stay awake. How old is she? Patrick Clancy: 31-33. Dispatcher: Is she awake? Patrick: Yes. Dispatcher: Is she breathing? Patrick: Yeah. Lindsay, what did you do to your neck? She’s talking. Dispatcher: When did this happen? Patrick: In the last half hour. Dispatcher: How far did she fall? Patrick: 20 feet. (multiple voices are heard) Dispatcher: Is she responding normally? Patrick: A little bit. Wake up! Dispatcher: What part of the body was injured? Patrick: Her neck. … She’s breathing. Lindsay, look at me! Look at me! Dispatcher: Are there weapons? Patrick: I don’t see any. Where are the kids? (multiple voices are heard) Dispatch: Do not move her. Patrick: Open your eyes. Can someone – OK, Lindsay, look at me. Open your eyes. Dispatcher: I’m going to tell you how to stop the bleeding. Patrick: It’s not bleeding … open wounds. She’s in the backyard. Dispatcher: Is there something on her neck? A knife or something? Can you put pressure on it? Patrick: No. (multiple voices are heard) Patrick: Lindsay, wake up. (moaning is heard) Dispatcher: Put pressure on the cut. Patrick: Lindsay, look at me. Say my name. She’s conscious. Dispatcher: Don’t move her. Tell her to be still. (Whimpering is heard in the background, as well as sirens in the distance.) Dispatcher: I’m going to stay on the line with you. Is there a fence? Patrick: Right here, right here! … I need you to stay, and I’ll go check on my kids. Patrick: Hello? (footsteps are heard) Guys? Guys? Oh, no! (yelling is heard) Oh, no! (more yelling) Wake up! (Patrick is heard screaming). Dispatcher: What is he screaming about? Patrick: (Crying, screaming and gasping) OH, MY GOD! (more screaming) Dispatcher: Hello? What’s going on? Patrick: Basement! Basement! OH, MY GOD! Dispatcher: Hello? hello? Patrick: (Screaming. Screaming, Screaming.) AHHHHH, SHE KILLED THE KIDS!!! OH, MY GOD! (Screaming. Screaming. Screaming. Screaming.) Dawson! My buddy! (Screaming) Dispatcher: “Oh, s***.” Please pray for Patrick.
1
2
161
Es correcto.
Lindsay Clancy is a filter. The psychopaths in your life are now visible. Get rid of them.
1
1
3
191
Las feminazis están pasando de “my body, my choice” a “my children, my choice”. Qué peligroso.
1
7
12
2,072