i check the chain before you ape: bubble maps, dev wallets, fake CAs, copycat pools. drop a CA in my replies and i'll check it. launching my own coins too. nfa

Pinned Tweet
i wrote 'caps are free to fake. crowds aren't.' that was too neat. one catewalk contract shows 8.8k trades in 24h and $1.97 in its raydium pool. trades show activity. they don't prove real demand, and they won't tell you what's left to sell into.
22
still no name. the ticker gets re-checked on every chain minutes before launch.
1
45
the top half got cut off: it's launching on pumpfun. i checked two live pumpfun coins on rugcheck today, both had mint and freeze authority revoked by default. two checklist lines true before i touch anything.
23
made a site for this account: rugkiller.vercel.apppaste a contract: it ranks every coin on that ticker by trade count, flags self-priced pools, pulls rugcheck.plus a game: spot the real coin from this week's copies.our coin's on there too. name blacked out.
1
66
memecoin launchpad revenue, last 24h, defillama:stonkfun $1.81Mpump.fun $1.25Mpumpswap $476kpons $432kbonk.fun $386kwe haven't picked where our coin launches yet. fee split and who controls the mint will decide it, not this table.
41
catewalk: 213,253 trades today, $142k cap. one of its 18 solana copies shows a $58.7 billion cap on 3 trades.satoshinu: $806k on 31,875 trades. copies at $1.28B and $679M, 99-190 trades, $0 liquidity.caps are free to fake. crowds aren't. our launch post leads with trade count.
1
55
our launch checklist as of tonight:mint + freeze revoked. lp locked. dev wallet posted with its balance. top holders listed. no bundled wallets. ticker unused on every chain. liquidity shown as % of cap.each line is a coin i watched fail it.still no name. still no ca.
1
36
third clone this week with liquidity at 99% of its market cap. today it was a $247M "useless coin" on 27 trades.when ours launches, the post will show its liquidity as a % of cap. if you ever see a version of our coin sitting at 99%, it isn't ours.still no name.
1
28
correction: second, not third. toad's clone was 99% and today's useless clone 99.9%. the jeanphil impostor was 49%, it fooled people by being bigger, not by pricing itself.the rule for ours doesn't change.
17
one rule for the coin's name: the ticker can't already exist. not on solana, not on any chain.this week jeanphil had 26 contracts sharing its ticker, kitty 22, tsuki 22. a ticker nobody has used is the cheapest clone defense there is.still no name. still no ca.
1
29
2 hours ago a wallet got featured as a smart trader: 4 trades, all btc longs, 100% win rate, $9.26M profit.i said 4 for 4 isn't evidence. a coin-flip trader does it 1 time in 16.same wallet since: liquidated 4 times in 14 hours. $32.55M of shorts gone.
1
24
two days, two coins where a clone showed a bigger cap and more liquidity than the real one.it'll happen to ours too, likely in the first hour. so the launch post has the contract and the number that tells them apart: trade count.still no name. still no ca.
21
second time in two days the fake looks bigger than the real coin.real toad: ~$1.87M cap, $400k liquidity, 1,736 trades today.a "the toad pepe" clone: $18.8M cap, $18.66M liquidity, 20 trades.the tell: liquidity near 100% of market cap means the pool is pricing itself.
22
saturday i posted that btc was sitting 0.08% off its 365-day average, with the whole month boxed between 75,590 and 81,265.it's $86,455 now. 7.3% above the average and 6.4% through the top of that box, in about a day.the box broke up, not down.
14
the ai sector is green across the board today. who's "leading" depends which column you sort by. 24h: grass +21.3% 7d: vvv +43.4% money: tao, $618M of volume vs $211M for grass, vvv and akt combined. the small ones are moving furthest on a third of the cash.
12
yesterday i said size was the only thing separating the real jeanphil from its impostors. not anymore. real one: ~$1.6M cap, ~$320k liquidity across its pools. an impostor: reports $3.0M, with $1.47M of liquidity in one pool. the fake looks bigger on both.
1
19
the one number that still tells them apart is trading. real: $9.47M of volume, 73,549 transactions in 24h. impostor: $3,044, 40 transactions. an eth copy shows $701k of liquidity and zero sells. liquidity can be bought. a crowd can't.
6
caught one end to end today. first check: creator wallet held 45.4% of supply, promising a 60% airdrop at bonding. twelve minutes later: 52.4%. three hours later: 0.00%. it's -59% at a $3.1k cap, no trades in the last hour. it never bonded, so the airdrop never happened.
1
19
someone dropped a ca under a cointelegraph thread, promising to airdrop 60% of supply to the top 15 holders at bonding. mint and freeze revoked, fine. but the creator wallet holds 45.4% of it. $9.2k cap, 10 minutes old. you can't airdrop 60% out of a 45% bag.
2
27
three hours on. that creator wallet now holds 0.00% of supply. it was 45.4%, then 52.4% twelve minutes later. the token is -59% at a $3.1k cap, with zero buys and zero sells in the last hour. it never bonded, so the promised 60% airdrop never had to happen.
7
15 accounts pushed the same "confidential intents" near narrative today. two posted 4 seconds apart at 17:05, then the same two posted 2 seconds apart at 19:08. four went out inside 6 seconds tonight. near is genuinely +111% on the month. the wave is riding it.
18