Matterpool's attitude is all about solving problems and serving customers. We represent pure proof-of-work.
Despite the crap attitude, I like what Matterpool are doing. Pushing the boundaries of risk taking to set the bar for other miners & create competive pressure. If they had some hash power this would matter more & have an impact. Matterpool needs to fix that so they CAN matter.
2
1
38
Replying to @eyeone
A) Protocol is set in stone. Read the original source code. 0 sat outputs were allowed. They were later blocked in consensus as "non-standard" in 2010 before this was superseded by "dust" policy in 2017. Remove dust from policy and you are left with the original implementation.
1
4
23
Yes, exactly one @EquityDiamonds. If your business has needs that aren't being fulfilled, please let both @mxtterpool and @TaalBlockchain know. I'd be willing to put money on who delivers first though. This isn't risky, experimental stuff. It's just Bitcoin.
3
11
Many are just now realising that satoshis are proof of stake in a proof of work game. Hashrate writes the ledger. Tokens just demonstrate opportunity cost in dollars. What happens when miners discover better ways of demonstrating opportunity cost? 🤔✨#️⃣
7
15
60
Matterpool retweeted
0 sat transactions (output + fee) means that people can finally use Bitcoin without owning Bitcoin. Huge on boarding hurdle solved.
5
12
55
ASICs go brrrr
1
12
mood
Replying to @shadders333
It literally took longer to build the node than it did to make the changes required to unlock a whole new level of functionality for our customers. Not sure what all the other miners are waiting for. "Too hard" is the BTC mantra. I'll always say "Yes!" to providing paid services.
1
7