co-founder @retrodotapp (retro.app)
San Francisco, CA
- Tweets 879
- Following 3,379
- Followers 3,577
- Likes 13,575
Big day for @retrodotapp
30
3
262
13,172
Nathan Sharp retweeted
just discovered you can mail physical postcards to your friends via the @retrodotapp 📬 –now that’s playful! very quick handoff too :))
2
2
20
1,223
Nathan Sharp retweeted
bring back wholesome social media
Retro, a friend-focused photo-sharing app built by former Instagram employees, has raised more than $21 million in Series A funding.
spr.ly/6018B100s2
2
7
68
16,535
Nathan Sharp retweeted
Remains my favorite app on my phone
Retro, a friend-focused photo-sharing app built by former Instagram employees, has raised more than $21 million in Series A funding.
spr.ly/6018B100s2
10
10
270
134,025
News is out on a round we closed a while back to keep growing Retro as the single best place to share your life with your friends.
We gotta make social media social again
Retro, a friend-focused photo-sharing app built by former Instagram employees, has raised more than $21 million in Series A funding.
spr.ly/6018B100s2
49
22
592
64,850
Nathan Sharp retweeted
let's be real, none of this would ever happen on instagram :)
Almost half of the people who open @retrodotapp on any given day post something to it.
@nsharp17 (Retro co-founder) told us about the most serendipitous things that he's ever seen on the app:
"One of my heroes in the industry joined, and I won't say any names, but he posted a flight itinerary to Retro."
"It just struck me. This is such a private person, and he's posting such a public document. It just made me feel great."
"A second magic moment was somebody else, also a very public person who really values their privacy."
"They announced their baby's birth on Retro. And in their email send out, they said, 'follow me and the adventures of this baby on Retro.'"
More below 👇
1
16
2,479
Retro's co-founder, @nsharp17, on why Reels will never be a feature on Retro:
"Reels seems like the hyper evolution of short form entertainment."
"Retro was launched almost in response to all social media having gone really hard on the entertainment use case."
"So we don't expect ever to bring Reels to Retro."
"It's supposed to be feel good social media, real photos from real friends, and not hijack your time and attention."
"I still use Instagram, I still use Reels. It just doesn't have a place on Retro."
1
2
11
2,281
Nathan Sharp retweeted
we launched stories on this day 10 years ago 🥹. video cred to the 🐐 @nsharp17
4
1
38
3,493
Love the idea of doing something “beautifully” as a new standard in general, and in tech in particular. So awesome that @patrickc is devoting some
of his brilliance to improving aesthetics
“We've always tried to do things well at Stripe. I've come to see that attempting to do them beautifully is often a helpful way to break out of standard practices and to do something with greater novelty and in a way that might have other benefits besides.”
Someone asked me recently why I’ve become interested in aesthetics after having spent most of my life more interested in STEM-adjacent topics. I hadn’t really considered the question consciously before, but I’m certainly thinking about aesthetics more than I used to. I think it’s a confluence of things:
• Many things today are ugly and far uglier than they used to be or need to be. Once you see this, it’s kinda hard to stop perceiving it. (Early twentieth century phone boxes versus modern phone boxes; old water fountains versus new water fountains; etc.) As someone with a naively meliorist assumption that most things should be getting better rather than worse, it’s all a bit perplexing: why did we stop doing things nicely? Is it a choice? Was there a malevolent spell cast upon us? This vein led me to think more about modernism and why much of art became more intentionally "challenging", grotesque, opposed to prettiness, rebarbative, dissonant, etc. Can or should anything be done about this? Is this just how things ought to be?
• Relatedly, much of modernism involved a kind of explicit repudiation of cultural continuity and represented a schism with prior practices. This is maybe most evident in American architecture, where the International Style exhibition in 1932 initiated the displacement of a rich tapestry of prior styles. This cultural break seems important and interesting to me, and I suspect that the rejection had important consequences outside of the aesthetic domain. Samuel Hughes has been exploring this question in his recent writing at @WorksInProgMag; @RuxandraTeslo is also pulling on this thread. Elaine Scarry wrote about how beauty inspires creation. If so, the inverse may also be true: ugliness inhibits it.
• It’s clearly the case that changes in the aesthetic domain can at least inspire progress in other places. Petrarch helped set some of the preconditions for the Renaissance which in turn fostered the scientific revolution and Enlightenment. Things like World Fairs (the 1851 Fair at the Crystal Palace recorded 6 million admissions when the population was 21 million) reflect the popular interdependency that used to exist between aesthetics and material development.
• @tedgioia and others have written about stuck culture and how so many domains seem to have ceased to straightforwardly advance in the way that they did up until the nineties or thereabouts. This is obviously peculiar and interesting. What changed, and what does it mean? Is it about the internet and fragmentation? Is it about a loss of supply? Is it just about having reached the zenith of various mediums?
• I’m generally interested in markets and the dynamics of creation. In aesthetics broadly, I find the reflexivity between supply- and demand-side factors to be very thought-provoking. There’s a natural desire to view satisfaction of individual preferences as the yardstick to measure market success, but things get interesting and even a bit unsettling when we start to think about how the supply might start to shape the demand. I often think about this in the context of food. Why is food so much worse in Germany than many of its neighbors? Germany certainly doesn’t have less material ability to produce good food; indeed, Germany is richer than the countries around it. There’s probably something about German food supply chains that is impoverished relative to France and Italy, but the Germans themselves don’t seem too upset about it. It just seems that the Germans are stuck in an objectively worse market equilibrium than their neighbors: the food is bad and they’ve gotten used to it. The obvious question then is where else these kinds of reflexive patterns apply, and where else we’re stuck in some objectively inferior equilibrium, even if preferences are in some superficial sense being sated.
• While this is an extremely banal and obvious point, I hadn’t until recently thought much about or internalized how much one can study reasonably objective things ("the status of women in society", say) through artwork. (Thanks to @_alice_evans for opening my eyes here.) In this vein, I’m pretty excited about the possibilities over the coming years in computational art analysis. I want something that’s conceptually similar to Google Ngram timelines but for the visual arts.
• We've always tried to do things well at Stripe. I've come to see that attempting to do them beautifully is often a helpful way to break out of standard practices and to do something with greater novelty and in a way that might have other benefits besides. (Also, excellent people want to do great work because it is intrinsically satisfying. Explicitly allowing aesthetic considerations to carry weight avoids having to justify every assessment with some kind of torturous empiricism.)
• In his Nobel Lecture, Solzhenitsyn said that, among the Platonic virtues of goodness, truth, and beauty, that beauty is special, for it possesses a unique kind of irrefutability. He notes that arguments, writing, and philosophical systems can all be predicated on misapprehensions, but that “a true work of art carries its verification within itself.” He proceeds to observe that when goodness and truth are threatened, the “ever surprising shoots of beauty will still force their way through.” There is a lot of specious and motivated reasoning in the world today and plenty of questionable value systems. I don’t think that beauty directly reflects any definitive trait, but I’m intrigued by the idea that it can be a marker of deeper metaphysical coherence.
3
1
41
6,058
Nathan Sharp retweeted
On this great birthday, let’s remember the classic American pattern: we get embarrassed, then we get busy. Sputnik went up, and within a year we’d built NASA and DARPA (new institutions, created at warp speed, that gave us the moon landing and the internet).
At 250, we shouldn’t need the embarrassment. Crisis got us this far, but ambition must take us from here. We have plenty of it in this country. That ambition (and the country) deserves a government on a shot clock!
Let’s be great on purpose now:
8
6
118
22,547
Amid the AI arms race, good to see teams continuing to innovate in the social space
Beyond Instagram: Introducing the next generation of social apps techcrunch.com/2026/06/06/be…
4
1
51
19,050
