If a black inmate had been deprived of food and water, left to sleep on a feces-covered floor, and not allowed to shower for nearly a month by white jailers, what do you think would happen? It's been 74 days since Gary Blair was killed in the Chesterfield County Detention Center. No one has been arrested. No state charges, No federal civil rights charge. No food. No water. No showering. He lost about 100lbs in under 6 months. 6 people lost their jobs. That's it. #JusticeforBubba

Sir Oswald Mosley tried to prevent the War, Churchill imprisoned him. The Nazi Party’s core promise was protection from Bolshevik communism that was spreading across the West from Russia & that had already infiltrated Germany. The Germans knew who created & funded this horrific movement. In 1933, the Communists set the German parliament building on fire, Germans saw it as a signal for a violent Bolshevik uprising. Naturally they fought back. The First Concentration Camp- The Dachau Concentration Camp was established specifically to hold COMMUNIST political prisoners. The very first inmates sent to the camp were German Communists, Antifa etc.. Many of the mass killings that happened in Poland that were blamed on Germany later turned out to have been committed by the Bolshevik Communists & even Russia has admitted this yet the mainstream narrative remains the same. It’s 2026 & still the West still teaches & supports so many proven lies & refuses to update history to tell the truth about WW2. Fake edited photos still hang in the museums & are used in education text books. We are seeing so many parallels play out today with the Communist take over of the West & the lies, manipulation & propaganda. Globalists & Communists are regularly platformed & highlighted in media & common sense, honest voices are silenced & censored. There is a reason that they didn’t teach you about the greatest crime against humanity in the West: The Bolshevik Revolution… So they could do it all again. (This is only a tiny piece of the truth, it is up to YOU as an individual to seek out the truth) Nothing is ever what it seems.

Easy peesy. Look back through post WW2 history. There's a very distinction pattern. It begins around the CIA, narco trafficking, weapons trafficking and trained mercenaries to protect the international racket. Those mercenaries are generally collected along the way from operations the CIA set up to either coup a country or use it as a narco state. Probably the two best examples (there are many) are AFG and Colombia and both center on the heroin/cocaine racket. Colombians are in Ukraine as mercs and at one point it was estimated there were 20K excess mercenaries trained by CIA/Spec Forces in Colombia alone. NATO (their military and intel agencies) and the UN rent them for operations. AFG had CIA trained 'terrorists' show up in all the former Soviet Stans to destabilize any pro Russia government, Chechnya, Bosnia, it became a Muslim terrorist Walmart for intel agencies false flag operations. This goes back all the way to the Philippines and the OSS/CIA, Formosa/Taiwan and Chiang (heroin) and his KMT army that attacked mainland China for 40 yrs post WW2. It's directly related to Operation Gladio and NATO's secret armies which ensured the nazi's presence in Ukraine survived and thrived. What is actually hard to understand is why more ppl are talking about it. It's all written down, it's historically documented, and it's hard to find a country where these activities don't involve the CIA and a nazi or two at its origin. Myanmar/Burma is at the very root of this story dating back to WW2 when the CIA was looking for a place to stash Chiang and his KMT army before they settled on Taiwan. The largest heroin producer in Burma offered the US a narco free Burma for $5M investment in alternative crops and assistance in the transition (like the Taliban did after the CIA left AFG post 1980's USSR boondoogle) but the CIA/State turned him down. Decided CIA controlled heroin market was much more important than a stable country without heroin. Once you understand they control the narco trafficking and require mercs to protect it and terrorist attacks as distractions, the rest begins to make more sense. Strategy of Tension ensures their continued control.

The world consumes roughly 28 million tonnes of copper every year—a mass equivalent to five Great Pyramids of Giza. Yet that refined metal is just the tip of the iceberg of a far more monstrous physical reality. Beneath those 28 million tonnes of copper sits a massive geological footprint: billions of tonnes of blasted rock, colossal volumes of chemical tailings, vast energy expenditures and trillions of litres of water. This is all fresh, relentless demand. Crucially, up to 75% of that copper never enters individual turbines, solar panels or electric vehicles. It goes into the invisible grid infrastructure required to link everything together and make it function. When you trace 28 million tonnes of copper backward into the Earth, the true scale and cost is staggering. The drive to overhaul the global energy structure rests on a profound misunderstanding of physics: it treats energy supply as a 'software' problem while ignoring the devastating raw material gridlock caused by manufacturing billions of solar panels and over a million wind turbines, with hundreds of thousands more in the pipeline. When an energy system shifts from reliable, high-density fuels—hydrocarbons and uranium—to low-density, intermittent sources like wind and solar, the physical apparatus needed to capture, convert, stabilise and transmit that diffuse flux just explodes. It becomes an absurd trade-off: expending colossal amounts of finite, high-grade fossil fuels upfront simply to dig up materials for low-density generators—generators that can never run a steel mill, power an ocean cargo vessel or sustain international air travel. Mining is already a vast consumer of continuous energy. As global copper ore grades decline—frequently dropping to 0.5% or lower—the mass of rock that must be dug, hauled, and crushed grows exponentially per unit of recovered metal. Crushing rock alone accounts for roughly 3% to 4% of total global electricity consumption. Demanding billions of additional tonnes of processed metal creates a self-defeating loop: huge volumes of reliable, baseline power are consumed just to extract the raw materials needed to construct weather-dependent hardware. Yet the primary metals drain does not come from the turbines or arrays themselves. It stems from the enormous physical web needed to transport that energy across vast distances. Diffuse generators located hundreds of kilometres from cities require unprecedented volumes of step-up transformers, substations, high-voltage transmission lines and regional grid overhauls. The heavy overhead wiring looping across the landscape regularly dwarfs the metal required to build the turbine in the first place. Because two centuries of industrial civilisation have already extracted the highest-grade deposits, meeting future demand forces miners to dig deeper, crush harder and manage billions of tonnes of toxic slurry. This is a twin crisis: the escalating physical cost of ore recovery on the front end, and an unprecedented tsunami of industrial e-waste bound for landfills on the back end. The physical limits of this model are not dictated by how much metal remains in the crust, but by the soaring energy penalty required to dig them up and refine them. Heavy industrial processes—blast furnaces, chemical synthesis, cement production and deep-shaft mining—all need continuous, high-temperature thermal energy and uninterrupted high-voltage power. Intermittent turbines and panels cannot reliably deliver that dense power to sustain heavy industry, let alone an entire national economy. The ultimate irony is that the staggering industrial muscle needed to build, maintain, and periodically replace these diffuse energy systems relies entirely on the coal, oil and gas they were meant to replace. The dream of a fully weather-dependent industrial grid ignores physical reality. It overlooks a looming nightmare of endless ore extraction, refining bottlenecks, and perpetual grid expansion.

We put a Pakistani Muslim in charge of London and its police. We put a Pakistani Muslim in charge of our border and our national police. Both enforce consistent malevolent two-tier anti-British policing. Both want to flood our country with the violent third world. Are we insane?

WOW 🚨 There is a taxpayer funded charter school for Muslims in Columbus, Ohio. On camera they are teaching students that non-Muslims go to hell and their purpose is to spread Islam in America You’re not going to believe this, taxpayers are paying $10,435,836 PER YEAR for this school to operate The school is called Focus Learning Academy of Northern Columbus in Columbus, it’s a public K–8 charter Funding reported from the school’s Ohio Auditor of State report: - Total revenue: $9,972,915 - State foundation basic aid: $7,654,007 - Federal and state grants: $2,268,249 - Other operating revenue: about $50,659 - Total expenses: $10,435,836 That is roughly $16,000 per student Get this, The academic page lists full-time Arabic language instruction for grades K–8 An estimated 98% of the students are Muslims. The students are described as ‘overwhelmingly Somali’ WE ARE PAYING FOR THIS

Technology should make everything cheaper. It does, in fact, make everything cheaper. The spreadsheet replaced entire accounting departments. The tractor replaced forty farmhands. Containerization slashed global shipping costs by roughly 90 percent after 1956. Manufacturing robots now produce goods in hours that once took weeks. Every one of these innovations compresses the real cost of production. So why does your grocery bill keep climbing? Because a counterforce erases every efficiency gain before it reaches your wallet. Central banks, primarily the Federal Reserve since 1913, expand the money supply faster than productivity grows. The Fed has increased M2 money supply by over 40 percent between 2020 and 2022 alone. Ludwig von Mises identified this mechanism precisely: every dollar created without corresponding production dilutes the purchasing power of dollars already in circulation. The gain from the robot on the factory floor disappears into the monetary expansion decided in Washington. Government spending compounds this. Federal outlays exceeded $6.7 trillion in fiscal year 2025, most of it deficit-financed, meaning newly created money chasing existing goods. Licensing regimes, zoning laws, and FDA approval timelines add years and billions to bringing productive innovations to market. Technology is genuinely winning the war against scarcity. Televisions, clothing, and computing power cost a fraction of what they did in 1990. Housing, healthcare, and education, the three sectors most saturated with government intervention, keep climbing regardless. Inflation is a policy. Deflation is what free markets deliver.

L'argent public vers les ONG sera interdit dans le futur. Hier j'ai dit que c'était le plus grand mécanisme de corruption de l'histoire. Beaucoup m'ont demandé pourquoi. Alors je vais vous expliquer comment ça fonctionne. Commençons par le nom. ONG. Organisation NON gouvernementale. Retenez bien ce mot, parce qu'une énorme partie de leur argent vient des gouvernements. Entre 2021 et 2023, l'Union européenne a versé 7,4 milliards d'euros à des ONG. Plus de 12 000 structures. Et la Cour des comptes européenne (pas un compte complotiste, la Cour des comptes) conclut qu'il est impossible d'avoir une vue d'ensemble fiable de l'endroit où va cet argent. Il n'existe même pas de définition claire de ce qu'est une ONG. Ni en droit européen, ni en droit français. Maintenant, regardez la boucle. L'État finance une ONG. L'ONG fait du "plaidoyer", c'est-à-dire du lobbying : rapports, campagnes, rendez-vous avec les élus. Elle réclame plus de régulation, plus de programmes, plus de budget public sur sa thématique. L'État vote ces budgets. Une partie revient aux ONG. Et on recommence. Le génie du système, c'est que l'administration se fait réclamer par la "société civile" exactement ce qu'elle voulait déjà faire. Le contribuable paie deux fois : la politique publique, et la campagne qui la réclame. Vous pensez que j'exagère ? En 2025, la Commission européenne a elle-même reconnu que certains programmes de travail d'ONG financés par le programme LIFE contenaient des actions de lobbying inappropriées, y compris ciblant des députés européens. De l'argent public pour faire pression sur des élus. Ce n'est pas moi qui le dis, c'est la Commission. La Cour des comptes européenne note aussi que personne ne vérifie si des pouvoirs publics contrôlent ces ONG via leurs conseils d'administration. Elle cite un institut enregistré comme ONG dont la direction était composée exclusivement de représentants publics. Une ONG gouvernementale. Tout est dans le nom. Maintenant, les milliardaires. Le vrai coup de maître, ce n'est pas de dépenser son argent. C'est de faire dépenser celui des autres. Prenez Bill Gates. Sa fondation est devenue le deuxième financeur de l'OMS derrière les États-Unis, autour de 10 % des recettes sur la dernière décennie. Mais contrairement aux cotisations des États, cet argent est fléché : il finance les priorités choisies par le donateur. Sur la polio, plus de la moitié du financement de l'OMS en 2022-2023 venait de sa fondation. Une fondation privée qui oriente l'agenda d'une organisation financée par les impôts de presque tous les pays du monde. Personne n'a voté pour ça. Même logique avec Gavi, l'alliance vaccinale lancée avec son argent : la fondation met la mise de départ et fixe la direction, puis les États apportent l'essentiel des milliards. Un dollar privé qui tient le volant, beaucoup de dollars publics qui suivent. Soros, c'est la version politique du même levier. Open Society finance depuis des décennies des réseaux d'organisations de plaidoyer partout en Europe : justice, migrations, médias, "droits". Ces structures construisent une expertise, une légitimité, un carnet d'adresses. Puis beaucoup d'entre elles candidatent aux subventions publiques, siègent dans les consultations officielles et fournissent les rapports qui servent à écrire les lois. Le milliardaire paie l'amorçage. Le contribuable paie la croisière. Voilà comment on nous a eus. Pas avec un complot. Avec un montage parfaitement légal : des positions politiques déguisées en "société civile", financées en partie par vos impôts, qui ne passent jamais devant un électeur. Un parti politique doit publier ses comptes, plafonner ses dons, se soumettre au vote. Une ONG fait de la politique sans aucune de ces contraintes. La solution est simple. Une ONG doit être non gouvernementale, donc zéro argent public pour le plaidoyer. Une association qui rend un service concret, une soupe populaire, un centre d'accueil, peut être payée par un contrat de prestation transparent, avec des résultats mesurés. Mais faire du lobbying avec l'argent des contribuables pour réclamer plus d'argent des contribuables, ça doit disparaître. Vous voulez défendre une cause ? Convainquez des citoyens de vous financer volontairement. C'est ça, la société civile. Ce sera interdit un jour. La seule question, c'est quand.

Ce qu'il y a de bien avec tout ce qui se passe en ce moment, c'est que ça polarise. Les masques tombent. Et il ne reste plus que deux camps. Le premier, c'est le camp du ressentiment. La victimisation érigée en identité. La haine de celui qui réussit. Et au bout de la chaîne, toujours le même poison : l'antisémitisme. Aujourd'hui, ce camp a un visage parfait : LFI. Mettez-les au pouvoir et vous aurez droit à un remake du XXe siècle. Jean-Luc a réussi un exploit que l'Histoire croyait impossible : la synthèse entre l'hitlérisme et le stalinisme. Le second, c'est le camp de la liberté. Le libéralisme. La responsabilité individuelle. Les marchés libres. La beauté. Le bon sens. L'idée simple, et pourtant radicale, que tu es propriétaire de ta vie, de ton travail et de ce que tu construis. Si on veut un exemple de ce que ce camp donne quand il prend le pouvoir aujourd'hui : Milei. Et voici ma conviction. Les crises du XXe siècle ont accouché, systématiquement, du collectivisme. 1917, 1933, l'après-guerre : à chaque effondrement, la même réponse. Plus d'État, plus de contrôle, moins d'individu. On connaît le bilan. Le XXIe sera différent. Le XXIe sera le siècle du libéralisme. Le vrai. Pas celui des plateaux télé. Et la fin du gauchisme. Pour toujours. PS : il existe un troisième camp. Le « en même temps ». La moyenne des deux. Ni collectiviste assumé, ni libéral. C'est le pire des cancers. Parce qu'il se dit libéral. Il en a le vernis, le vocabulaire, les costumes. Mais en dessous, c'est toujours plus de dépense, plus de normes, plus d'État. Le collectiviste, au moins, annonce la couleur. Le « en même temps » te vend la liberté et te livre la tutelle.

UNVEILING THE SECRETS OF OCCULT FREEMASONRY x.com/i/broadcasts/1qJVmywDP…

Is the CIA back in Venezuela?

When White people in the United States, Canada, or Australia complain about immigration = “You’re all immigrants anyway- open the borders!” When White people in Britain, France, Spain, or Holland complain about immigration = “Open the borders- you must atone for your colonial past!” When White people in countries with negligible colonial history (Ireland, Sweden, Denmark etc) complain about immigration = “These people just want a better life - you’re a Nazi if you oppose open borders!” Different excuses, different lies. They simply don’t want White people to have a home.

トルコ人二人で日本人女性を多目的トイレに連れ込みレイプして現金を奪い女性の下半身から体液が検出され起訴された裁判で→「体液付着は犯罪の裏付けにならない」と無罪にした石井俊和裁判長がこちら himanews.jp/ryo00426/

Michigan: If you vote for the Muslim Brotherhood, don’t expect the rest of us to come save you. The Muslim Brotherhood is banned or designated in more than 10 countries, including predominantly Muslim countries that learned the hard way. The warning signs are already there. Don’t ignore them, then expect everyone else to pay the price for your choice.

Europeans choosing not to have kids because they don't have enough money, while Muslims live off our welfare. It literally means we're not having kids so we can support theirs.

I had dinner tonight with multiple professionals in the medical industry (actual Americans). Providers and administrators. The experiences they have had and continue to have primarily with Indian doctors is shocking and appalling. Rampant Insurance fraud, blocking out Americans from medical school and residency, and even allowing family to work illegally in the United States. We don’t have a shortage of Americans that want to be doctors and are qualified… we have a broken system that has been taken over by a colonizing diaspora. This also dramatically increases your insurance bill. The insurance companies aren’t eating the fraud. Then they send the money back to India so it isn’t even circulating in the U.S. economy. Every report also said that the service is consistently sub-par, many don’t speak English well, and some of them are so bad they question the legitimacy of their education. DO NOT USE FOREIGN DOCTORS

Sudan is ranked the second most dangerous country in the world. In Sudan, rape & violence are a part of “everyday life”, even in areas without conflict. Many Sudanese illegal migrants bring this extreme violence to Britain. We have enough evidence to justify an immigration ban on Sudan, to protect our people. Full video coming soon📽️

There have been several hate crimes against Swedes involving humiliating acts, including immigrants raping boys with sticks and similar assaults. And when people speak up about these crimes, the left belittles them and mocks them. They are the worst kind of people.

I did a movie called Black Hawk Down. If you haven’t seen it, you probably should. Importing these people into the USA is insanity.

In June 2026 Consumer Reports teamed up with the food-scanning app Yuka and lab tested 40 popular US snacks and packaged foods for additives. One in four had more of an additive in a single serving than the daily amount some public health agencies in the US or Europe have identified as safe. The biggest number in the whole test: Hostess Donettes Powdered Mini Donuts had 261 milligrams of titanium dioxide in one serving. That was more than 760 times the amount found in the other three products that contained it, combined. Titanium dioxide is a white pigment. It's the same stuff used in paint and sunscreen, and in food it makes powdered donuts, candy, gum and frosting look bright white. In 2021 the European Food Safety Authority said titanium dioxide "can no longer be considered safe" as a food additive, because its tiny particles can build up in the body and the agency could not rule out damage to DNA. The European Union banned it as a food additive in 2022. To be fair: titanium dioxide is legal in US food. The FDA allows it at up to 1 percent of a food's weight, and has said the safety studies it reviewed do not show a safety concern. Health Canada reviewed it in 2022 and found no conclusive evidence that it is a health concern in food. A petition to remove it has been under review at the FDA since 2023. Consumer Reports also says there is no reason to panic if you have eaten these foods, and that its test results are not a legal judgment. Hostess's parent company, J.M. Smucker, did not respond to Consumer Reports' requests for comment. A food industry group, the Consumer Brands Association, called the report misleading and said America has one of the safest food systems in the world. Same test, other findings: one serving of Jell-O Zero Sugar Chocolate Fudge instant pudding had nearly 9 times the daily Red 40 level that California health officials identified for children. Kraft Heinz, which makes Jell-O, said a safety concern is not supported by the evidence, and that it plans to remove Red 40 from its US products by the end of 2027. Little Debbie Oatmeal Creme Pies had over 9 times California's cancer risk level for glycidyl esters, a contaminant from processed oils. Read the ingredient list. If it says titanium dioxide, that's the one Europe took off the shelves. Contaminants Lurking in Your Food… For this investigation, we anonymously purchased and analyzed over 120 samples of 40 popular processed foods to determine the average amount of eight additives and two process contaminants present across multiple product lots. We then compared the amounts detected against safe daily intake levels set by U.S. and European public health agencies—including the FDA, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment—and adverse effect levels identified in peer-reviewed scientific studies. Finally, a team of scientists analyzed the resulting data to calculate a “hazard quotient,” or the level below which no adverse health effects would be expected to occur, for each of the 10 substances, taking into account a lifetime of chronic exposure. In all, 11 products exceeded this level of concern for adults, and 14 for children. These products contained enough of at least one concerning substance that consuming a single serving daily would pose an increased health risk over a lifetime. “These foods shouldn’t be part of a regular diet,” says Eric Boring, PhD, the CR chemist who oversaw this testing project. “Based on our findings, they should only be consumed occasionally, if at all.” Sources: Consumer Reports and Yuka, "These Popular Snacks Contain High Levels of Additives and Contaminants," June 9, 2026; EFSA opinion on E171, May 6, 2021; Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/63; FDA, "Titanium Dioxide as a Color Additive in Foods"; Health Canada, "Titanium dioxide (TiO2) as a food additive: Current science report," 2022. consumerreports.org/health/f… consumerreports.org/health/f… wmur.com/article/consumer-re…