If you want to make the most progress you've ever made in your life, you need to be alone. You need an extended period of isolation, not influenced by friends or media, spent building your future. You need space to learn, think, experiment, and fail. Give yourself 6 months. Focus solely on the development of your mind, body, spirit, and finances. This is how you get ahead of most people.

Hey timeline! I'm interested in connecting with people around: - software engineering, - AI, - technology, - startups, - product development, - programming, - science, - space, - creativity, - writing, - curiosity. LET'S CONNECT 🤝🤝🤝

After thirteen flights, explosions, booster catches, new engines, damaged heat shields and thousands of engineering lessons, SpaceX is preparing to do something different with Starship: put it to work.

Meta’s latest announcements are not really about smart glasses, AI agents, or VR in isolation. They are about something bigger: changing the interface through which we interact with computers.

I'm folowing accounts that are: - product founders - software developers - creative writers - technical writers - builidng a community of shared interests - engaging with my post

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is more interesting than the version number makes it look. This is not just “Grok, but slightly smarter.” The real story is that xAI is clearly pushing Grok toward becoming an AI worker: something that can code, operate tools, work inside terminals, reason across long tasks, inspect its own output, and keep going. And the price makes that especially interesting. Grok 4.7 starts at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens. That matters because the future of AI is increasingly not: prompt → answer It is: goal ↓ search ↓ read files ↓ write code ↓ run tools ↓ inspect results ↓ fix mistakes ↓ repeat ↓ finish the work And agents burn tokens. According to xAI’s published evaluations, Grok 4.7 improves significantly over 4.6 across coding, terminal use, engineering, and long-horizon professional work. One of the biggest jumps is Terminal-Bench: Grok 4.6: 20.3% Grok 4.7: 38.0% That is close to an 87% relative improvement. CursorBench also moves from 40.4% → 46.3%. DeepSWE moves from 65.2% → 71.0%. And its engineering benchmark jumps from 53.0 → 64.0. The numbers themselves are not the entire story. The direction is. xAI appears to be optimizing Grok less around “give the smartest answer” and more around: “Give this model a difficult job and let it work.” Grok also has access to things that become increasingly valuable in an agentic workflow: • web search • native X search • code execution • file search • function calling • remote MCP servers • document retrieval • image generation That makes Grok particularly interesting for developers. Imagine giving an AI access to your repository, logs, database tooling, cloud APIs and terminal, then asking: “Find why this production issue happens, reproduce it, patch it, test it, and explain exactly what changed.” That is where models like Grok 4.7 are heading. Not better autocomplete. Not better chat. Software that can actually do work. And at $2/$6 per million tokens, xAI may be making one of the most aggressive bets in the frontier-model market: Maybe the winner will not simply be the smartest model. Maybe it will be the model that is smart enough, fast enough, tool-capable enough, and cheap enough that you can afford to let it keep working until the job is finished. That is what makes Grok 4.7 worth paying attention to.

X changed its algorithm again. So I went through the latest open-source recommendation code to understand what actually changed — beyond the usual “post more” and “replies are worth X likes” advice. The biggest shift? X is getting better at deciding who should see your post, not just rewarding accounts that are already big. That matters if you’re a small account. I found: •explicit cold-start logic for smaller creators •stronger out-of-network discovery •deeper engagement prediction •mutual-follow effects •author diversity rules •and a recommendation system increasingly built around audience fit The biggest takeaway for me: Your first 1,000 impressions are not just an audience. They are an audition. I broke down what changed, what the code actually means, and how small accounts can position themselves to grow under the new system. Including a practical 30-day posting strategy. Full article ↓

X Algorithm Update!

I gained 4 followers yesterday and I keep going I’m a full stack developer, building a product and looking for a niche of people that are inspired to make something I follow back once you know why you’re on X

Growing online is a painstaking thing. I know because I’m doing it too! But slowly and surely, you’d connect with people that share your experience. So this is your sign to keep at it!

I’m down to connect with: Product developers Indie founders Entrepreneurs Creatives Curious minds Drop a reply and I’d follow back 🚀🔥

I’m a solo founder from Nigeria Looking for more builders and developers to connect with !

So far today, I’ve gained 2 followers. It’s nothing much but it’s worth noting and I thank everyone . I’m a full stack developer, a programmer and an entrepreneur. Most importantly, I follow back. As we keep growing, I’d be sharing more about myself 🙏

Bro, starting from 0 and growing on X is actually HARD.

DO YOU KNOW: In @ChatGPT 's image gen, if the image generation is yet to show an image, you can play snake on it while it generates😂