x-Apple / x-Rivian (tech team founder) Disruption happens. Optimism ahead. 🚀🇺🇸 My Articles nitter.net/pbeisel/status/1848807…

Silicon Valley
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @McConaughey
Have a conversation with Simmons about his vile behavior.
1
2
88
Replying to @IngrahamAngle
Absolutely disgusting behavior by @TexasFootball player defensive end Colin Simmons. There is no place for this in sport. Period. @ColinSimmons__ apology not accepted. "I apologize for the celebration. I was definitely in that mode, feeling myself. But, you know, it happens. Charge it to the game". No, its doesn't happen unless you make it happen. No, we will not "charge it to the game". It's on you.
214
Absolutely disgusting behavior by @TexasFootball player defensive end Colin Simmons. There is no place for this in sport. Period. @ColinSimmons__ apology not accepted. "I apologize for the celebration. I was definitely in that mode, feeling myself. But, you know, it happens. Charge it to the game". No, its doesn't happen unless you make it happen. No, we will not "charge it to the game". It's on you.
4
1,014
Replying to @Clint_Bo_Bint
To my knowledge ALL Cybercabs operating in the state of California have driving controls. This would be a legal requirement at this point. These are purely engineering vehicles, "driven" by engineers.
1
1
83
Almost impossible to travel the 280 between Palo Alto and San Francisco and not see a Cybercab. I saw 3 today. One on a trip to San Francisco, and 2 on the way home. (Also saw another in downtown San Francisco).
3
4
102
2,440
Replying to @MikeMcPoint
No, I definately meant "cleavering"... the action of using a heavy butcher's knife. That's why it started in quotes.
1
3
75
Amazing who people look up to
1
73
Replying to @thejefflutz
And he is the master at theater. That defines his career.
1
14
642
Agentic isn't the cleavering point. And I say "cleavering" purposely because our politicians are really that stupid about technology. They are like pretend heart surgeons applying a cleaver as their primary tool. Agentic means nothing more than something that can operate asynchronously to their human directors. And, yes, to cure cancer you need AI to operate agentically. Duh. That said I also agree with @Chamath's read on this. @BarackObama is playing a power game here, like he does always. Maybe talking ignorantly about something will stop certain politicians from gaining power over it. Though it never stopped them before. Go away @BarackObama, the world needs to progress without "old men clinging to power".
Chamath on Obama’s AI Warning: Follow the Money President Obama last week: “If we are thinking about AI just in terms of how do we cure cancer or get better energy, you can do that without having agentic AI. That's a misalignment between what our society needs and the commercial imperatives that these companies are facing.” @Chamath: “This is a very important moment for a very simple reason, which is we, as in the world, are about to endow three, four, five, six companies with about $10T of wealth. And what Obama knows very well is that most of those companies are overwhelmingly left-leaning. And what he also knows is that there is a huge portion of that money that will then get put into philanthropic and charitable causes that then he, and the people around him, will be beneficiaries of. That is the truth. We already know this because we know that some of these frontier corporations actually ask you to stand up DAFs and have a portion of your stock that you're willing to pledge. So this money is going to go to things other than consumption or savings. And so it's going to go into PACs, it's going to go into political movements, and (Democrats) stand to disproportionately benefit. So this has nothing to do with prosperity. This is a very simple political calculus. If you freeze frame the economy the way it is today, a handful of organizations that will disproportionately be able to affect the Democrats will win. They will capture the lion's share of the economic gains, and then they will help the Democrats win power. That's all this is.”
10
8
77
7,243
Mr Musk does not think linearly.
Replying to @wintonARK
If we are that low, I would be quite disappointed
6
151
15,147
Replying to @niccruzpatane
Stupid
4
32
1,087
Replying to @Jason @heatframes
I want 69. Or $69.
2
719
Google will win in the west. Pay attention
1
96
Replying to @unusual_whales
How is Barack identifying these days?
3
314
correction: I'LL GET RIGHT ON THAT LOL
1
6
574
Haha, as a software engineer, if I meant that I would have typed !truth. ^ was just pointing up.
1
92
2035
From 2025 to 2030 SpaceX could ~40x its active GWs of compute. If they deliver on these installs it would put them 20% ahead of our 2026 expectations.
1
42
10,521
JEFF, IF YOU COULD TYPE THIS OUT IN ALL-CAPS I THINK IT WOULD SEEM MORE NEWSWORTHY. ACCURATE. CREDIBLE.
9
1
71
1,585
Replying to @miguelaraizac
Imagine not having The Sopranos on this list. WTFF.
5
563