This is incredible. An Algerian Hamas supporter who became an illegal overstayer in Britain, lied to immigration officers about it, and went to prison for it, is now in a senior role at the BBC. Because the Tories and Labour failed to deport him. Hicham Yezza has a long record of supporting Islamist violence. He was arrested in 2008 for possessing an al-Qaeda terrorist training manual. He came to Britain on a visa that expired in 2003. He stayed anyway. When immigration officers caught up with him, he told them his passport with the visa stamp had been stolen. They found it in his flat. A jury convicted him of deception. He was jailed for nine months. Then he won his appeal against deportation, and was later handed British citizenship. Now he’s the Principal Data Scientist in the BBC’s “Responsible AI” division, helping to decide how AI shapes what BBC News tells you. Before that he worked at BBC Monitoring, briefing BBC journalists on the Middle East. Can you guess what kind of briefings he gave them? He should never have been allowed to stay. Under Reform, people like him never will be. Under Operation Restoring Justice, we will detain and deport anyone who broke into our country. Our borders will mean something again.

🚨SHOCKING: Look at who they are letting into Britain – this is outrageous. An Islamist ISIS terrorist who belonged to a gang that BEHEADED people like Ken Bigley is walking FREE on Britain’s streets. Mohammed Yaseen, from Iraq, was part of an ISIS gang that oversaw brutal public executions, the Mail on Sunday reports‼️ He entered Britain illegally on a small boat. He was put in a taxpayer-funded hotel in Basingstoke. He was sent to prison for two years but was released after serving just six months. He was then just moved to a hostel in Windsor, also paid for by British taxpayers, and was seen shopping near Windsor Castle by the Mail on Sunday. What on earth is happening to our country?! Is anybody else starting to think this is happening deliberately?

Which groups are NOT destroying historic buildings? Which groups are NOT rioting, looting, or calling for the destruction of a nation-state? Which groups have the utmost respect for heritage, ancestry, spirituality, and collective loyalty? The 'far right' and zionists.

A French woman is forced to watch as her business is looted and wrecked. For some people, a riot is an opportunity for profit. The U.S. say that the riots in France are due to mass immigration. Are the Americans correct?

Check this out: “As a former RNLI Crewman Volunteer of 15 years let me educate you of Maritime Law if I may. When these rubber boats set off from France overloaded, the French are breaking maritime law by not intercepting them and returning them to shore. When these illegal migrants boats have sailed almost 3/4 of the way to the UK and now in British waters, the RNLI and Border Force are sent out by the Coastguard on the instructions of HM Government to intercept them. They do this because if the rubber boats are allowed to land on uk soil under their own steam then everyone on board becomes an illegal immigrant and by law MUST be detained and deported asap. However when they are picked up at sea, even if only 200 yards offshore, and in no danger whatsoever, then the RNLI and Border pick them up and they are longer called illegals - conclusion The French and The British are doing this on purpose - WHY?”

Madness Utter madness The people 'in charge' of our electricity are lunatics telegraph.co.uk/business/202…

Man voted in by 24,927 people prepares to Betray 17,410,472 who voted for Brexit. That's 700:1. We won't forget his treachery telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…

Music, like all art forms, IS political. The whole point of artistic expression is to bring to life the emotions and feelings that the world doesn’t always know how to express in everyday life. It’s to make a statement. They’ve lost the plot and who put them there.

Wow, wow, wow. I just left the National Press Club where Minister of Communications @AnikaWells spoke. She repeatedly and brazenly lied about the fake accounts, claiming they were only for enforcement, even though the legislation says in black and white that the eSafety Commissioner can use them in unlimited ways for "educational" and "promotional" purposes. One big moment came when a Politico reporter got up and said something about how mean people like @PaulineHansonOz were to eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant. Seriously. A supposed reporter was white-knighting for a government official during the official Q&A. The same reporter had come up to me before Wells' speech and asked if I had criticized Inman-Grant. Who needs government censors when you have Politico? After he asked his question, Wells showed the most emotion, describing online criticism of Inman-Grant as "abuse." She also talked about her own staff's supposed suffering. I kid you not. The mask dropped, and you could see what really upset her: people — including a sitting Senator — criticizing government officials. After gaslighting the audience about fake accounts, Wells repeatedly insisted the government wasn't trying to censor content. She said this after filling her speech with examples of content she claimed harmed people. You couldn't make it up. This legislation is the culmination of decades of progressives equating words with physical violence. Wells cynically compared her legislation to prevent psychological "harm" to various laws that protect people from physical harm, like seat belt laws. BTW, Wells never said what content it was that she thought caused eating disorders. Pictures of skinny women? Dietary advice? Who knows. Nobody asked. Another important moment came when Wells explicitly said Australia would be pursuing censorship alongside other nations, including the UK, France, and Spain—all countries where governments risk losing power to populists. I spoke with Julie Inman-Grant before the speech began and asked about the fake accounts. She insisted they were there just for enforcement, and when I asked why the law allowed them to be used for government propaganda, she said she might write an "enforcement memo," which, of course, would have no impact on the legislation. After her speech, I went up to Wells and asked if she was seriously saying the legislation didn't allow the government to use fake accounts for government propaganda. She refused to answer. A man who said he was from the National Press Club stepped in front of me and said I could interview her afterward. But that wasn't possible because they rushed her out the back to avoid any difficult questions. So there you have it. The pettiest people in Australia are seeking to silence citizens and their political opponents in the name of protecting children. These deeply intolerant and cynical people want to control what you can see and say online. And they're doing it with most of the media's support. Australia has reached a new low in its rapid descent into dogmatism, intolerance, and censorship.

Well, that was wild. I'm at the Australian Parliament and just left a meeting with two staffers for the governing party. They told us that the government needed more power to censor things like the upcoming US execution of Nidal Hasan. When I asked why they needed to censor that video, one said it was to prevent copycat killings. Copycat killings by governments? I asked. Er, no, they said. Copycat killings like of a backpacker, several decades ago. So, under that logic, I pointed out, the government should censor things like last year's Bondi massacre, where two Muslims killed 15 people, no? Well, that was news, they said. Didn't they realize their bill would allow the government to censor news? They didn't seem to know, or care. They also admitted that they did not know that the bill would allow the government to create and operate an unlimited number of fake social media accounts to attack its political enemies and spread disinformation. Having presented them with information they had never heard about a bill they had clearly not read, they emphasized to us, strenuously, that they were moving forward with the bill. So there you have it. The government wants the power to arbitrarily censor scenes of violent crime, or violence, for any reason. And it wants the power to use an unlimited number of fake accounts to wage offensive disinformational warfare against the Australian people. Given that the Bondi massacre last year increased public opposition to mass migration, and support for the populist One Nation Party, it seems obvious that the government wants to censor such events in order to protect its political power. It's quite telling how obediently governing party members insist such a law is needed without even knowing what's in it.

Imagine if Kamala won election US will be just like France God blessed US , God blessed Trump

'My evidence is just 45 minutes away from destroying Brexit. My Weapon of Mass Destruction. But I'm never going to tell you what it is. But my mate Alastair Campbell agrees. He's seen WMDs before! Just believe me and obey' - Honest Andy from Manchester. Or maybe Liverpool

And Britain is following very close behind Germany. Our climate ministers can congratulate each other that they led each other to national bankruptcy and global irrelevance. But there'll be precious few others joining them

The UN has finally been forced to admit that their evidence on Climate Change was flawed. Was it a hoax? Was it a lie? Whatever it was, it has cost the British Taxpayer a fortune. Businesses have closed people have lost jobs. We should stop all payments to the UN. Put them all on the dole and fire Miliband. x.com/cindysomemore/status/2…

Erin Molan SLAMS Angelina Jolie over her post about destroyed buildings in Gaza. “Well Angelina, the reason that the top is rubble is because of what exists beneath…the terror tunnels where they took the hostages into, that they killed the hostages in.” - @Erin_Molan

The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph revealed the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote". In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks. That was the only way that "nature" could win. However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo. The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House. The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural. Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain" Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar. The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists. Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths. Me on @GBNews:

Here are the Law Students from @mcgillu celebrating the 3rd anniversary of the October 7th terrorist attacks. Never forget their faces. We won’t and will not stop until each one has a name we can notify the public on.

If this was white people with anti immigration views… this would be rolling news. It would be spoke about by every left leaning politician. But it will be ignored… especially by @MayorofLondon

🚨HERO: An 85-year-old grandfather deliberately sits in his living room to be killed by terrorists—tricking them into thinking the home was empty and saving his hiding family! When armed militants attacked Kibbutz Nahal Oz on October 7, 85-year-old Shlomo Ron—one of the founding members of the community—recognized the mortal danger facing his loved ones as gunfire echoed through the streets. He immediately ordered his wife, two daughters, and grandson into the home's reinforced safe room, refusing their desperate pleas for him to join them inside. Believing that an empty house might invite a detailed search, Shlomo reasoned that if attackers found an elderly man sitting alone in the front room, they would assume no one else was present and leave after taking his life. Shlomo calmly sat in his favorite living room armchair and waited as armed assailants broke through the door. Finding Shlomo alone, the terrorists shot him dead and immediately exited the home without searching the property further, leaving the hidden safe room entirely undiscovered. Because of his deliberate, calculated self-sacrifice, Shlomo’s wife, daughters, and grandson survived the multi-hour siege unharmed—honoring a hero who gave everything so his family could live.