This is an incredible watch because Mogg (lmao) is so articulate and calm, Tucker keeps slamming into him like a raging bull. Comments are delusional. mogg says if the UK seeks peace it should prepare for war (sensible, clearly). Tucker replies “OHHHH Y U SCARED OF RUSSIA”
Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg explains how Britain, which has a combat ready military force about half the size of New York’s police department, must prepare for war with Russia. 0:00 What Is This War and Why Does Britain Need to Fight It? 19:40 Is There Majority Support for War With Russia? 25:02 Will We See a Nuclear Exchange? 26:18 Is Using Nuclear Weapons Accepted in Christianity? 33:15 Was WWII Good for Britain? 39:08 Is Ukraine a Sovereign Country? 47:29 Would Hitler Have Invaded Britain? 53:45 Britain's Attacks on Anti-War Voices 58:38 Is a War With Russia Worth the Lives of Britons? 1:03:07 What Has the British Government Done With Palestine Action?
75
Banger this made me like British people again
39
playerTwo retweeted
Made with AI
345
361
3,076
263,351
playerTwo retweeted
Just try it, California.
1,368
3,288
27,299
5,618,741
There’s literally nothing wrong with this and if you think there is, where is your 2 trillion dollar company? Matter fact where’s your $0 company? Or any of your direct reports?
Anthropic co-founder Daniela Amodei and husband used stuffed-animal 'advisory council' for workplace conflicts: report trib.al/56qjBzd
1
109
Odds that Zuck planted this to get the heat off CJ Desai?
We are terminating Chris Degnan for unethical conduct involving Cognition. The last few months have seen incredible progress in AI capabilities. San Francisco has flourished as new companies that solve new, more ambitious problems are finding great success. Generally, it is a wonderful time to be building. We at @FactoryAI have seen overwhelming interest in our model-agnostic coding agents and our software factory product. Our team has 10x’d in size, while our revenue has 100x’d year over year. This momentum has been unprecedented. A much larger competitor, Cognition (makers of Devin) has fallen behind us on the capabilities that matter most to customers: cost, quality, and security. Instead of competing in the market, Cognition engineers feigned interviews with us to pry information about our product. Not finding what they were looking for, Cognition has decided to throw their weight and money at people with direct knowledge of our most confidential plans. It feels as though ethics is being thrown out of the window in the AI era. People are willing to do anything, including exploiting privileged information and violating ethical boundaries. I think this is unique to our time, and I don’t think it’s right. Integrity still matters. Yesterday, I made the decision to immediately terminate Christopher Degnan’s roles as a Board Observer and Advisor to Factory, after over a year of service. Prior to this decision, Chris told me he had a casual conversation with an executive at Cognition AI. When I questioned his intentions, he reassured me that ethics aside, he had “made too much money” and was “too lazy to go work for Cognition,” which I trusted and believed. On Monday, Chris spent time advising the Factory team on a handful of confidential board-level matters. That evening, he called me to say that the conversation that was initially described as casual and one-off was actually formal and recurring. For weeks, while he sat in our board meetings and advised our leadership team, he was also confiding with executives of our largest competitor. Chris was subject to confidentiality obligations in connection with his work with Factory. We do not know the extent of the information he shared, but it puts his timely questions about our product roadmap and what the parity gap involves into a new light. It is sad to sever a relationship with someone who has been a trusted advisor - and even a close friend - for over a year. But Chris’s conduct is unacceptable to me. Trust in Board Membership is one of the sacred bonds in the Silicon Valley, one that helps the startup ecosystem thrive. With it comes an enormous responsibility. That trust was violated. Competition is good. I respect and in many cases admire our competitors. San Francisco is a beautiful, singular place where the bold and ambitious go to defy the norms and precedents of the past. But certain principles that must remain. Violating ethics to seek advantage turns what should be positive-sum into zero-sum. We all love technology. And we all love to compete. But we must hold ourselves to a higher standard. The future of software engineering comes with abundance that will impact every person on Earth. Building that future comes with immense responsibility. We must build and compete with integrity.
104
I basically did this all the time with candidates, I would constantly blame the HR lady or recruiter for being extremely inept and stupid. The candidate always understood
I had an offer extended to me from JPMorgan like 4-5 years ago and I was on the phone with the hiring manager who had a thick Chinese accent and the first thing he said over the phone was “Sorry the process took so long. Our HR lady is SO RETARDED” and I was like oh ummm
3
399
I can't tell you how much I love that Trump called Jensen a handsome guy, and then when it was Sundar's time in the spotlight, he said "you're a monster and no one knows about you, what a beautiful life that must be"
11
It's always such a treat to listen to Jared gush about NASA. You can even see Dave Limp is like a kid in a candy shop listening to Jared go sci-fi. What an executive, they should keep him as NASA administrator til death like in the supreme court
FULL: NASA Admin Jared Isaacman Discusses Advances in Space Exploration - 09/29/26
67
This made me laugh a lot, bro really called Sundar a monster twice with no explanation. His name is Sundar. Sundar the monster
Trump calls Sundar Pichai "a monster"
1
175
I'm ngl Sam is not beating the allegations wearing a belt like that around a bunch of students
Just met @sama and am starstruck p.s. the @OpenAI student collective builder party also had amazing food :)
46
playerTwo retweeted
Experience gives perspective. Programming is not dead, and never will be. It's late September 2026. Sometime in September 1976, just after I entered college, I wrote and ran my first serious program. I have now been a programmer for literally 50 years. And man, I have seen it *all*. Punched cards to glass ttys on minicomputers to workstations to the earliest micros. I've written business software, communication programs, development tools, games, language implementations, kernel device drivers, graphics libraries, a few critical pieces of infrastructure, and all manner of odd programs for which there is no taxonomy. Coded in a score of languages some of which are now forgotten. I've run over 70 open-source projects and contributed to at least as many more. Along the way I noticed a few things, and wrote about them, and that made me famous. But I'm not here to write about that today. I'm here to write about what it means to be a programmer and a technologist with the Singularity upon us. I have lost count of the number of times I have been told "programming is over". You kids may think this is a new claim that came into the world with LLMs. Hah! There's been that kind of talk at every step function in the quality of our programming tools. I first heard it when compilers were replacing hand-hacked assembler in the early 1980s, and I wouldn't be a bit surprised if somebody said it earlier when in-memory code replaced plugboards. One constant amidst all this change is that the intentions in a user's head do not magically turn into executable instructions that a computer can run. Another constant is the mindset of the people who specialize in bridging the gap between wish and algorithm. A programmer is a programmer is a programmer - the tools are secondary. "But it's different this time!" some people will say, "AIs are superhuman now!" So? What did you think the optimization stage of a compiler was, chopped liver? We've been relying on tools that exceeded human capabilities all along - we built them precisely because our meatbrains could not otherwise keep up with the demands of the job. It's been a hell of a ride, that 50 years. I've succeeded and failed and succeeded again. Done a lot of work I'm proud of. Built at least a few things that look like they're going to last. None of that goes away because, hypothetically, an AI might have made me faster. The work is never done, even if the tools can talk to us now. Because intentions still have to be communicated; people who specialize in that and develop right mindset to do it still have a major advantage over people who don't. If you're feeling depressed because you spent years or decades developing hand-coding skills that are obsolete now? Buck up. You still have the most important asset - a mind that knows how to think that way. I'm facing the winds of the Singularity with a smile. Because 50 years and I'm still standing - still shipping code that people can use, still learning, still refusing to be paralyzed by the pace of change. The best therapy for your uncertainty? Get to work on something.
140
586
3,062
185,397
Haven't decided if it's an escitalopram or sertraline kind of night yet
54
It makes me extremely confused whenever I think about the fact I'll never stay up all night working through a bug on my own again. That I'll never have the sweet satisfaction of discovering the problem after days of fighting. I'll never write that last line that Just Works.
if you were a software engineer and you don’t feel grief about giving up coding you simply weren’t a good one.
1
1
200
1. This is amazing 2. Are you not entertained? 3. I will move to Hong Kong or any sovereign new land and help them accelerate if the US screws this up
Made with Claude Opus 5.5. The fearmongering about AI always makes us forget that NOTHING WENT FOOM, as was always predicted. Send this to your doomer friend who has a very high P(Doom). Accelerate.
1
70
playerTwo retweeted
Made with Claude Opus 5.5. The fearmongering about AI always makes us forget that NOTHING WENT FOOM, as was always predicted. Send this to your doomer friend who has a very high P(Doom). Accelerate.
469
867
5,681
882,920
it's 2026 and losers are still self-identifying without anyone asking also you're not a computer scientists no computer scientist goes outside especially not wearing a suit?? look babe, new larp just dropped
Day 1 of standing outside the UN with a big sign until something happens This worked extremely well - I had probably 50 people with UN or Press badges take pictures with/of me - gave an interview with one journalist and my contact information to another - someone with a very large entourage read my entire sign - met Alex Bores on his way to a meeting about AI The attitude from people I met was almost universally sympathetic. People are worried Good day
67
I share a lot of these thoughts, but part of me is incredulous. A lot of thoughts/emotions in the air right now, hard to pin down how I really feel. He's right, though.
My god this is such a good speech that every SWE needs to hear. You know what? Every person should hear it Keep the happy memories, eyes on the reality, be excited about the future. That’s the best that anyone can do
79
RELEASE THE MARTIN SHKRELI ALL-IN APPEARANCE
1
53
New psyop dropped
I’m starting to wonder whether clean code and architecture was just something designed for humans. Does clean code matter to agents? It’s all chinese to them. I’ve yet to hit a wall where they’re like “sorry, can’t make sense of this codebase anymore.”
70