They really don’t understand that nobody watches cable news anymore. They also don’t understand that video is put directly on the internet by lots of people and organizations. Brian apparently just woke up from a 25-year coma.

I will never give up because Trump never gave up.

“For decades” is something that people say right before something that was once true, but isn’t anymore. In the real world conditions change.

I wish @KerryKennedyRFK would help us understand why the memorial to JFK is in such a state of disrepair. Why did she not step up years ago? Wouldn’t that make Trump a non-factor in TKC right now? Hmmmm.

Do people not realize that saving $SBUX is the easiest thing possible? They need to train their employees to make the drinks properly with great consistently. If I am so fed up that I am making my own coffee the situation has reached absurdity.

It is obvious to anyone still capable of thought that @elonmusk is occupied with the only project that is actually civilizational: making the species multiplanetary. He does not have time for this attention-seeking nonsense, and he would find the “money spread” gauche even if he did. Go stand in front of a building with a prop. So boring.

My caption would have been slightly different: Random people wasting time because they're upset that Trump doesn't want to see the Kennedy Center remain in a disgusting and gross state of disrepair. Textbook definition of low IQ people who suffer from a dramatic case of TDS.

Choose the Frontier 🇺🇸 — Never Doom.

No dooming. America will be AI DOMINANT! Whoever wins AI, WINS! 🇺🇸

If you look at instagram and think your life should look like their life you have already lost your soul. you think what you're seeing is a view into what you want but it's just a carrot on a string leading you into a wood chipper filled with lies and copium. dont look to these people to tell you where your life should go, most of them are dying inside and their skulls are full of brain worms optimized to trick you into joining them. focus on your own path even if it feels rough and unseen, at least when you look down you'll see your own two feet moving instead of a fake paradise

Fully agree.

Law enforcers already have authority to charge companies and their CEOs for creating and releasing dangerous, unvetted, or defective products. We shouldn’t let discussions about new legal regimes distract from the fact that there’s no AI exemption from laws already on the books — a point @FTC emphasized repeatedly during my tenure. 1. There is an extensive set of laws that govern dangerous and defective products. For example, releasing unvetted AI models or agents can violate consumer protection laws. Shipping flawed AI tools without implementing adequate measures to detect and stop rogue or defective AI agents can be an “unfair or deceptive” act or practice under the FTC Act (and analogous state laws). And some state AGs are already exploring holding AI firms and their CEOs criminally liable when their models participate in criminal activity. 2. Existing laws also prohibit “unfair methods of competition.” This covers instances where AI firms appropriate the competitively sensitive information of their customers, including through tracking their use of various tools. It can also cover instances where firms pursue dangerous behavior, aware that doing so may compel rivals to do the same. As the Supreme Court has noted: “A method of competition which casts upon one's competitors the burden of the loss of business unless they will descend to a practice which they are under a powerful moral compulsion not to adopt, even though it is not criminal, was thought to involve the kind of unfairness at which the [unfair methods of competition] statute was aimed." 3. The highly concentrated and interconnected structure of these markets could be creating major risks and conflicts of interest. We had started investigating these partnerships and cross-investments across the stack (and released a preliminarily overview of some findings: ftc.gov/news-events/news/pre…). Both federal and state enforcers should be scrutinizing these opaque relationships and inter-dependencies. We are already seeing how these relationships could undermine accountability. For example, OpenAI could face liability given the Hugging Face incident, but Hugging Face being bought up by Nvidia means that we’re unlikely to see it file a lawsuit over this — given Nvidia’s strong incentive to see OpenAI continue full speed ahead. 4. As AI tools dramatically change the landscape of cybersecurity risks and hacks, all businesses should be doubling down on having core security protections in place. Firms that fail to invest in adequate data security measures or fix known vulnerabilities can also be breaking the law. A recent analysis showed that around 1/3 of Fortune 100 companies do not even have a way to notify them about security issues. During my @FTC tenure, we sued firms for poor data security practices and held CEOs liable when they were personally responsible. this.weekinsecurity.com/doze… ftc.gov/news-events/news/pre… 5. As policymakers consider new legal regimes, we should be looking to lessons from prior efforts to govern major sectors, such as banking and other networks, platforms, and utilities. Tools like structural separations, nondiscrimination, and supervision could be key, and there’s a rich history of what works and what doesn’t. But we can and must pursue any new efforts alongside enforcing existing laws.

Hating America isn’t cool anymore, commie.

One of my favorite videos!!!

The man has the energy of a 24 yr old. The wit of Johnny Carson. The charisma of Elvis Presley. The sense of humor of Don Rickles. The trolling ability of Muhammad Ali. All rolled into one. Love him or hate him, Donald Trump is one of a kind.

If you ever read one thing...it is this...

Facts!