I will debate anyone.

The White Australian policy was about being British, not White. Early Federal Australians wanted to protect the Britishness of Australia, and what does it mean to be British, for one thing it doesn't mean continental fascism, hunnic national socialism, nor does it mean excluding someone based on their race. Britishness has a global outlook, not an inward one like the Chinese. Populate or Perish was the first erosion of this policy and it mattered intensely because I am not sure if you are historically literate but without Americas help we would have been invaded by the Japanese and lost that war. What is your plan to populate Australia? I too want to increase our naturalized birth rate but the truth is unless you have 5 kids already, you are part of the problem. We have China and Indonesia on our doorstep and they have violent and territorial ambitions. Being in a recession one of the biggest threats to national security, what is your plan to grow the GDP, because a population is the amount of soldiers you can recruit and a GDP is how many ships, munitions, drones, radars etc that a country can afford. One must have a larger scope over matters and not think like the Chinese do but how the British did. There will be an Australian Empire one day and having a large population is the first key to this. What is your plan for National Sovereignty? What is your plan to increase the Native Anglo Birthrate in Australia? What is your plan to make sure we avoid recession and are able to increase our GDP 5-fold in the future? Immigration is a necessary short term plan but we cannot rely on it forever since every nation world wide right now is competing for tax-positive, working, business starting immigrants.

She walks as a forgotten legion through the fog of my soul, where every step crushes roses into blood and wine.....................Sigh.............. Forlorn, Forgotten.

/////////////She walks where the blackthorn drinks the last light of June, a daughter of broken standards and funeral dew. Her eyes hold the solstice rune, cold and absolute, where empires fall softly into violet ruin. Golden hair like winter wheat beneath the scythe, lips stained with the wine of every dying rite. In her shadow the dead drums beat once more, calling the faithful to kneel at the edge of night. She is the final rose carved from iron and thorn, a pale fire no grave can smother or mourn. My heart, a ruined field, blooms only where she treads /// eternal, merciless, and sacredly forlorn. /////////////

Her smile was a knife made of moonlight slipped between the Teutonic ribs of the world, sweet as glowing green absinthe, fatal as December........

She (P) walks as a forgotten legion through the fog of my soul, where every step crushes roses into blood and wine....... Oneitis yearning.....

Every single day I am met with so much misinformation on this app and there does not seem to be anyone fighting it besides a few lone rangers like myself. I implore everyone to read more philosophy, political philosophy and just information in general. Stop getting your information from memes and social media. Even if you have to use AI to get your information its much better than the random disorganized non-sense most people are spouting.

At the end of the day, Marx can never debunk Keynes, but Keynes can debunk Marx. The reason is that Marxism is a social theory and a theory of history, not an economic theory; it completely reframes the topic. Keynes posits that price and wage rigidity are the underlying elements of social cohesion and social planning, but a Marxist will simply hand-wave this away, arguing that these are merely historical forces of monopoly power that constrain people into a particular way of behaving. They argue that once price and wage rigidity collapse—due to the rate of profit reaching zero and the impossibility of market clearance—they simply will not exist in the future, and there will be perfect harmony between supply and demand based on qualitative measures. This is because quality represents use-value, while quantity is the exchange-value of a bourgeois society. Socialism is a universal qualitative construct according to Marxists, in the sense that a quality cannot become property; property relies on distinction and division, but nobody can own a quality. A quality is what existence is, and the activity of existence itself. Property is a thing that becomes the subject, is divided from its object, and owns its property by separating form from matter. Property is an acquisition of something or existence; it is reflected and gives the subject its identity, not by becoming the subjective, but by being able to reflect the subject on what it is and what it is not. Keynes believes in sociali planning and that in motion there has to be motion preserved, which is where rigidity comes from and this motion preserved is how society organises itself, that its able to create certain conditions out of rigid prices, and for those rigid prices to have a market clearing since there isnt a market equalibrium that its the role of the government to make effective demand to clear the market. A Marxist would say that this is a control of monopolies to steal the wages and production capacity off labourers since the prices are frozen for moments in time and that within these moments value is being extracted for asocial reasons.

Greta Gerwig is a fantastic director, you can see the mumblecore influence in theme kind of in the sense when they talk often they are seeking to be understood Even in the dialogue there are kind of like awkward extra words being mumbled about at times. The Barbie movie is simple, the theme is that feminism is contradictory because women at their root self are contradictory, contradiction is their nature, feminism and Girlhood doesn't have a simple straight narrow path but at each moment there is a paradox and contradiction to overcome and that is their being. And the answer is that instead of overcoming this contradiction you give light to it by voicing it and explaining it, and you acknowledge it and by acknowledging it, that contradiction is at the root you can reasoning with it. It really is quite brilliant. It also deals with the themes of concepts versus matter, or idealism versus realism, even the mentioning of Proust was cool since apparently he deals with contradiction entirely

'Manufacturing military equipment in Australia is up to 40% more expensive than in other allied nations due to high domestic wages, energy prices, and overhead costs. Australia’s overall manufacturing footprint has shrunk to a record low of about 5% of GDP. Australia lacks the deep, diversified industrial base and economies of scale needed to mass-produce advanced weapons.'

Reading Hegel made me realize how trash this whole reading list is/was. Yes a decade ago I was deeply involved in this vortex but Hegel saved my soul and mind and he really mogs all these other thinkers in infinitude way. if you are still stuck inside this vortex, escape, read Hegel.

Hegel on what it means to be European, which is a sublation of what is Other or Opposite to it and unifies it into itself. European Universalism, nothing can escape it.

Israel: An outpost of European Civilization opposed to Oriental Barbarism. A brave people embarking on a brave task.

Evil incel mode activation sequence. Melancholy of the mind, sorrow of the soul, heart beholden to hatred. Christ have mercy on me. Angels heal me.

He was also trying to rebuild Israel and Jerusalem. He self referred to himself as David for this reason, nobody in his courts call him Charles but by King David, he saw his operation as deeply biblical. It's also why he had his throne modelled after King Solomons throne.