..Privacy is not some abstract, negotiable preference or mere social convenience—it is the ontological foundation of property, freedom, and civilization itself. From the moment of self-ownership, every individual exercises exclusive control over their body, thoughts, and

..Nationalists can get away with ANY crime, because they are Nationalists. Jawab do Savakar Jawab do

..

..That argument quietly replaces the individual with the group. Inherited privilege is not an argument against merit; it is an argument against judging a person by his ancestry. If A is born into privilege, that does not make B entitled to a job because B belongs

लगता है भाजपा यूपी ने मेरे ऊपर लगा प्रतिबंध हटवा दिया है। पिछले पाँच घंटों में तीन जगह से यूपी चुनाव के लिए वीडियो और ट्वीट के रेट माँगे गए हैं। संभवतः यह लोग या तो मेरे द्वारा ‘रेट बताने’ के स्क्रीनशॉट ले कर ‘ये देखो GC वारियर, पैसा देख कर बिक गए’ करने वाले हैं, या फिर अंतिम विकल्प सोच कर कि देखो, कहीं ‘’जय योगी’ बोल दे, लड़ाई तो मोदी से है न’ पर मान जाए। पहली बात तो यह है कि आपकी सरकार के लोग मेरे एक जानकार की कैम्पेन डिजाइन/मार्केटिंग कंपनी का तीन करोड़ से अधिक रुपया, दो वर्षों से रिलीज नहीं कर रहे। तो आपके लिए कोई काम कर के पैसे क्यों फँसाएगा? एक बता रहा था कि आप लोग सरकार से लेते हो डेढ़ लाख और फील्ड में भटकते पत्रकार को मिलता है 3,000! जी हाँ, तीन हजार! तो सरकार का पैसा तो पत्रकारों को विज्ञापन के रूप में नहीं मिल रहा। एक पोर्टल है, जिसके वीडियो पर तीन हजार व्यू नहीं आते, उसकी बिलिंग 30-35 लाख प्रति महीना है। अब क्या RTI लगा कर पता करूँ कि किसको कितना मिल रहा है? दूसरी बात, मुझे दस-बीस लाख के लिए अपनी क्रेडिबिलिटी नहीं गँवानी। तो आप लोग अपना पैसा अपने पास रखो। मुझे जाँचने-परखने की आवश्यकता नहीं है। मैं तो वामपंथी, सपाई, कॉन्ग्रेसी हूँ। मुझे सोरोस से पैसे मिल रहे हैं। आप लोग कितना दे दोगे? जितना पिछले दस-बारह वर्षों में कर दिया है, निःशुल्क, उसी का चुकाने में आपको समय लग जाएगा। तो प्लीज जाँचिए मत। जो बुरे समय में गाली देते हों, साथ छोड़ते हों, घर पर पुलिस भेजते हों, ऐसे धूर्तों के लिए मेरे पास एक भी सकारात्मक वाक्य नहीं है। मेरा लक्ष्य यूपी चुनाव है। सवर्णों की जब तक सुनवाई नहीं होगी, हमारी स्पष्ट माँगों पर जब तक बात नहीं होगी, मैं लड़ता रहूँगा। या तो जीतूँगा, या हारूँगा, पर समय से पूर्व पीछे नहीं हटूँगा।

A reminder from Thomas Sowell that poverty has been the normal condition of mankind throughout history. What needs explaining is not why poverty exists, but how some countries have managed to become prosperous. Wealth does not simply appear; it has to be created. We can raise living standards only if we understand and encourage the process of wealth creation.

Murray Rothbard took Mises's price theory and drove it to a destination Mises never reached. Mises built the case that central planning fails because socialist planners cannot perform rational economic calculation without real market prices. Prices carry information that no committee can replicate. Rothbard accepted every word of this and asked the obvious follow-up: if state intervention distorts prices and destroys coordination, why stop your critique at the water's edge? Why exempt the state itself from the logic? The answer required property rights. Rothbard grounded everything in self-ownership. You own your body. By extension, you own what you mix your labor with, provided you homestead it from a prior unowned state. Every other right flows from this. Taxation is the seizure of your property under threat of imprisonment. From that foundation, Rothbard constructed anarcho-capitalism systematically, not as a utopian dream but as the logical terminus of taking rights seriously. Defense, arbitration, contract enforcement: private firms supply all of it in a competitive market. His 1973 book "For a New Liberty" laid this out with unflinching precision. His 1982 "The Ethics of Liberty" supplied the philosophical scaffolding. What Rothbard accomplished was a fusion, not a compromise. Mises gave him the economic engine. Locke and Lysander Spooner supplied the moral chassis. The result was a system where aggression has no legitimate institutional home, including Congress, including the Federal Reserve, including every bureaucrat drawing a salary your paycheck funded involuntarily.

..Thought for the conference ,: Milton Friedman "In a free society, it is hard for 'good' people to do 'good', but that is a small price to pay for making it hard for 'evil' people to do 'evil', especially since one man's good is another's evil."

"The losses from roads never built, factories never opened, businesses never started, and innovations never attempted are mostly invisible" This is preciously is the problem. Everyone read this great article 👇👇🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

इन दो लोगों ने भाई @ajeetbharti और बहन जी @neha_laldas ने आरक्षण वालों और बीजेपी आईटी सेलियो की लंका लगा रखी है...! अम्बेडकरवादी और बीजेपी आईटी वाले इन दोनों से ऐसे चिढ़ते है जैसे देवताओं से राक्षस चिढ़ते थे...! क्योंकि बीजेपी आईटी सेल और आंबेडकरवादी तर्क के साथ इनका मुकाबला कभी नहीं कर सकते इसलिए वो आखिरी में गाली देकर भाग जाते है।

Subversion: 15 Min Edition Demoralization: Instill an inverted moral framework that cons people into willingly subverting and ultimately sublating their own civilization; they then capture its institutions from within and reproduce that worldview across successive generations. Destabilization: Put that framework into practice, mobilizing people along shifting lines of social antagonism, radicalizing conflicts, and undermining institutional stability toward crisis. Crisis: Escalate internal conflict until established authority breaks down, creating conditions for revolution, civil war, or foreign intervention. Normalization: Consolidate a new authoritarian order, institutionalize its leadership and ideology, suppress and purge the revolutionary change agents.

Left-wing Pan-Africanists love telling Africans to reject the white man, then build their entire worldview around Karl Marx. I’m sorry but that is just too hilarious! 😭

A farmer, tired of rats destroying his crops and stealing his grain, came up with a clever but cruel plan. He threw a dead pig into a deep, abandoned well. Attracted by the smell, nearly 80 rats rushed into the well to feast on the carcass. At first, everything seemed wonderful. There was more than enough food for everyone, and the rats ate until they were satisfied. But when the food was gone, they discovered something terrifying. The walls of the well were too steep to climb. They were trapped. Days passed, and hunger turned into desperation. Desperation turned into aggression. The rats that had once eaten peacefully beside one another began fighting for survival. Eventually, they began killing and eating each other. One by one, their numbers dwindled until only a single rat remained. Its eyes were bloodshot, and it had survived by consuming its own kind. Then the farmer returned, lowered a rope into the well, and rescued the last surviving rat. But he didn't save it out of kindness or compassion. The farmer knew the rat had learned to survive by hunting other rats. When he released it into his fields, it would continue killing its own kind instead of eating his grain. The farmer had turned his enemy into his greatest weapon. And that is the lesson of divide and conquer. Those who control the trap don't need to fight the battles themselves. They simply create the conditions in which others turn against one another. The rats believed their enemies were the other rats. They never realized that the true enemy was the farmer who had put them there. The greatest danger isn't always the enemy standing in front of you. Sometimes it's the one who created the conflict and stands quietly watching you destroy each other. Before you turn against your neighbor because of their political beliefs, ask yourself who benefits from keeping Americans divided. While we fight each other over Republican and Democrat, we may be overlooking those who profit from the conflict. Perhaps the real question isn't which side you're on, but who built the well—and why they want us fighting at the bottom of it.

Well said sir

..Holodomor in Ukraine Survival was a moral as well as a physical struggle. A woman doctor wrote to a friend in June 1933 that she had not yet become a cannibal, but was "not sure that I shall not be one by the time my letter reaches you." The good people died first. Those

.. Mises on Churchill. How easy it is to slip to communism from democracy. Communism is 100% democracy

All forms of collectivism are evil freedom destroying ideologies.

Thomas Sowell explains why fascism and Nazism are left-wing ideologies: “Back in the 1920s, however, when fascism was a new political development, it was widely—and correctly—regarded as being on the political left.” “Jonah Goldberg’s great book ‘Liberal Fascism’ cites overwhelming evidence of the fascists’ consistent pursuit of the goals of the left, and of the left’s embrace of the fascists as one of their own during the 1920s.” “Mussolini, the originator of fascism, was lionized by the left, both in Europe and in America, during the 1920s. Even Hitler, who adopted fascist ideas in the 1920s, was seen by some, including W.E.B. Du Bois, as a man of the left.” “It was in the 1930s, when ugly internal and international actions by Hitler and Mussolini repelled the world, that the left distanced themselves from fascism and its Nazi offshoot—and verbally transferred these totalitarian dictatorships to the right, saddling their opponents with these pariahs.” “What socialism, fascism and other ideologies of the left have in common is an assumption that some very wise people—like themselves—need to take decisions out of the hands of lesser people, like the rest of us, and impose those decisions by government fiat.” Source: “Socialist or Fascist?” (2012)