In case you missed it, we teamed up with @tenstorrent and delivered realtime video. Video generated faster than it takes to play it!
If you want to test it, sign up at the link the comments.
H3 from @MiniMax_AI is live on Prodia! 🎬
Independently ranked on Artificial Analysis: #1 for video editing with audio, #2 for text-to-video with audio, #2 for image-to-video.
What everyone's shipping with it:
▸ On-screen text that stays stable across every frame — kinetic type moves instead of warping
▸ Audio + picture generated in one pass, in stereo. Lip sync holds across a full sequence, not just one beat
▸ Native audio in 11 languages, voiceover and on-screen text in the same generation
▸ Higher share of usable takes per generation → fewer rerolls, lower spend
I need a break from AI...
switching off from tech... by painting generated art (with Prodia) to paint by tokens? what?
London AI teaming up with @prodialabs & @UseCorgi
to have a chill Sunday afternoon painting in Corgi Cafe London first collab!
Whos coming?
Same 4-model video grid, different prompt. Wan 2.2, P-Video, Seedance Lite, Seedance Pro Turbo.
Variance between models on identical prompts is why multi-model access matters in production.
FLUX.2 [dev] vs. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
4.5s at $12/1K vs 0.9s at $6/1K. 5x faster, half the price.
For product catalogs and e-commerce thumbnails, that math compounds fast.
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B. 100ms. Near-instant.
4B parameters doing work that used to take much larger models seconds. Reflections, neon glow, atmospheric depth. Fraction of the compute.
Product shot: Recraft V4 vs Seedream 5 Lite.
Material rendering, lighting, composition. Both handle it, but reflections and textures differ noticeably.
At e-commerce scale, these nuances show up in conversions.
4 video models, 1 prompt.
Wan 2.2, P-Video, Seedance Lite, Seedance Pro Turbo. All different results.
Motion, consistency, speed, cost. Each has a sweet spot. Run them side by side to find yours.
Recraft V4 on text rendering. ~12s, $40/1K.
If your product needs readable text in generated images (menus, signs, packaging), this is where Recraft shines.
More than a demo, this was a real build
Mikhail Avady built an app live, showing how real-time image generation, Prodia's API, Lovable, and Magnific can come together in a practical creative workflow
Catch the full session on our YouTube channel
FLUX.2 [flex] vs Nano Banana 2, final round.
Across all five prompts: flex stays ahead on speed and cost. Optimized open source inference is pulling ahead.
Recraft V4 vs Seedream 5 Lite on a portrait.
~12s/$40 per 1K vs ~19s/$35 per 1K. Different approaches, different results. For user-facing portraits, these differences matter.
Veo 3 Fast in action.
Strong motion coherence from Google's video model. Closed-source pricing, but the quality shows what large training budgets produce.
FLUX.1 [schnell] vs. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
300ms vs 100ms. Same prompt. Klein 4B is a generational leap in lightweight models.
When your product needs real-time gen, this speed gap tells the story.