@programmersedge hey do you know if there is some kind of minimum amount of tokens that need to upgrade before nw goes live?

I see that Tao has to pay holdings for things, does holdings ever pay Tao for any of their work? Genuinely asking

Many argue bank was live up back in Dec 2025. Which was when bank was actually live & I dont know internal nuances of how or when, so i asked You use to call out the team for delays & dumping. Like you I'm just curious & i trust your expertise on matters

There's nothing to take back, it's literally what i meant and said we'll see. You still have not answer the question i asked in this post regarding the reports.

Just fyi; I didnt say the network growth wont appreciate token value incase you misinterpret it. All hypotheticals and speculation, i'm just saying, we'll know when it's launched. Right now the network still getting polished.

The bank loan was in AUG 2025, why is it just now getting publish? was it an annual or quarterly report & will it be public or just council? "Revenue association can use to build out, faster the network grows, the more token will appreciate" lol ok, launch first & we'll see.

but how? What does this 2% stake in #telcoin bank entail for $tel holders precisely? "WE" is likely not token holders. Does the community get quarterly progress reports from the bank? When does 5% annual yield SAFE notes from the 5 billion TEL loan get converted into shares?

It doesn’t

@_TelcoinJohnny @programmersedge @moldywoodpile

I affirm this analysis

Puggle is ready to be surprised

The concern here for @telcoin #telcoin $TEL is that money approved for exchange integration was used instead to pay Telcoin Inc.’s overdue August invoice for network work! then the community is being asked for another 137.5 million TEL to refill that same pot while the token upgrade is already live and CEX agreements are still only “in review.” That sequence looks like restricted treasury funds were diverted to cover a related party cash flow gap, after which token holders are asked to restock the budget before the original listings work is finished.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ What makes this more than a routine budget tweak is the timing and the conflict of roles. The upgrade is already live, so exchange support is the thing holders need most right now, yet the cash reserved for those deals was used to settle an overdue bill from Telcoin Inc. the same commercial entity whose work is being paid through Association treasuries that TAO itself administers. Asking for another 137.5 million TEL after the fact means the community is funding both the original development invoice and a replacement listings budget, while CEX conversion is still unsigned. That pattern raises a governance issue: if designated funds can be reassigned to pay a related vendor and then topped up with a new token allocation, treasury earmarks stop being binding and token holders absorb both the delay and the extra issuance.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ What does this do? self custody and Telcoin Wallet can move to new TEL today, exchange books cannot, which means two versions, thinning old TEL liquidity, and holders stuck choosing between waiting indefinitely or withdrawing to a wallet and doing the migration themselves. The $165k that was supposed to pay for those integrations was spent on Telcoin Inc.’s invoice instead, so the delay is not just slow paperwork, the exact work the treasury already funded and then redirected. Until listings and conversions are live, the token upgrade is live for the project and incomplete for a large share of users.

So ill ask again, is the same developer who deployed the bad contract during the 1.25m still doing work for the company?

Not a good look. see last photo, they are pushing ppl towards the telcoin wallet. Re directing treasury allocations and expecting nobody to say anything about it. Moving goal posts = 🚩🚩 #telcoin ethereum:0x467bccd9d29f223bce8043b84e8c8b282827790f

What’s up with Parker’s new proposal?