🟠 ⋒ BTC class of 2012 ⋒ 🟠 🪏🏦 Building the first on-chain prime brokerage for all ! @arch & @arch_prime . If you’ve got Bitcoin, you’ve got credit!

Buy any asset. Borrow against all of it. Earn on everything. One account. If @Arch_Prime delivered that I'd ______________. Fill in the blank
16
8
43
1,548
GM BTC Ripping...Again. Higher Please! 🚀
7
3
24
845
Imagine being able to put your BTC into a 6% yielding position, borrow 4x that value , put it into @onrefinance earning 12% , borrow agains that , buy $SPCX , let that earn 3% yield, borrow against that and take out a leveraged zcash:native long , put a down payment on a house and then buy your gf a ring on credit All from one prime account. Without the hoops.
18
6
43
1,700
Matt | Arch retweeted
Our docs just got an upgrade. Explore Arch Prime, its services, and how the whole stack works together. Read more: docs.arch.network/
20
16
68
10,472
BITCOIN! 🚀
13
6
37
1,155
The most valuable account in finance isn't a bank account. It's a prime account. One place where everything you own is collateral, earning, and borrowable at once. Only a few thousand firms in the world have one. That number is about to get a lot bigger.
8
8
35
1,054
New docs. It'll explain everything.
16
10
65
1,978
Got some huge news that I can’t wait to share. Let’s just say the team just increased in size by 8 quants , engineers and data scientists. That’s 24 total people now building something huge over at @arch
24
10
69
2,730
You get yield, you get yield, you get yield! What APY % gets it done for you ?
10
9
29
1,080
Matt | Arch retweeted
Prime.
39
21
106
17,614
"Capital efficiency" is the most important idea in finance that nobody outside finance has ever been given. Let me translate it.
13
11
44
1,583
5/ That isn't a law of nature. It's a product that was never built for you, because the unit economics of serving small accounts never worked on legacy rails.
1
5
149
7/ Assets that are always working, and always available when you need them. That's the thing hedge funds and HNWIs have had for decades. And It's what you should expect next.
6
138
There seems to be a trend with older protocols getting exploited when new ai models get released. It can’t be a coincidence this happened on the release of astra. External audits are not enough anymore. Teams need to be internally auditing their code with the latest models to find attack surfaces before malicious actors do. At @arch we internally audit every surface with a new model every time one comes out
Liquid Network just lost almost its entire $BTC reserve in a single Sunday incident. On September 6, ~4,000 BTC left the Liquid Federation wallet, worth ~$320 million. The reserve went from ~4,200 BTC to just over 200 BTC, meaning ~95% of the reserve suddenly left. Then things got weird. This does not currently look like someone simply stole the federation keys. Liquid says the withdrawal went through the SideSwap Peg-out  Authorization Key, or PAK, and that the key itself was not compromised.  The other authorization keys were also reportedly unaffected. The exact vulnerability has not been publicly explained. What we do know is that ~3,996 BTC was processed through a peg-out, with the corresponding $LBTC burned. That distinction matters because the LBTC supply was reduced alongside the withdrawal. Meanwhile, $USDT, DePix and the real-world assets issued on Liquid were reportedly unaffected. Then the person who moved the Bitcoin left a message on-chain: “we are whitehats. contact us on chain.” White hats? Maybe. But that is still only a claim. Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet has questioned whether the behavior fits a traditional white-hat disclosure, noting that legitimate security researchers would normally disclose the vulnerability before moving hundreds of millions of dollars. Liquid's model is simple: BTC is locked on Bitcoin while LBTC is issued on Liquid. During a normal peg-out, LBTC is burned and the corresponding BTC is released from the federation's reserves. That is what makes this incident so unusual. The peg-out happened, the LBTC was burned, and the BTC left the federation reserve, yet Liquid says the PAK itself was not compromised. So the mechanism that allowed this transaction to happen remains unexplained. Until the full mechanics are disclosed, calling this a “white-hat rescue” is premature. The funds have not been confirmed returned, and the people controlling them have not been independently identified as white hats. This matters beyond Liquid. For years, Liquid offered a different model for moving Bitcoin: BTC with a federation, an 11-of-15 multisig and a controlled bridge designed to provide additional security around a Bitcoin sidechain. On September 6, those security assumptions faced a brutal stress test. Bitcoin itself wasn't hacked. The Bitcoin network kept running. The incident happened around the mechanism connecting BTC on Bitcoin with LBTC on Liquid. And that distinction is everything. The $320 million is the headline. The real story is how ~95% of the federation's reserve was able to leave through a valid-looking peg-out while Liquid says the authorization keys themselves were not compromised. Until that is fully explained, this isn't just another crypto hack. It's a massive test of the security assumptions behind one of Bitcoin's largest federated sidechains.
14
7
34
1,871
Matt | Arch retweeted
Ben reveals the killer use case for tokenized stocks in DeFi "The ability to borrow against your equity positions, and still be long. That gives people flexibility, freedom, and more utility with cash"
141
122
663
68,110