Weighted chances = hold more for higher chances
I don't LOVE the idea of favoring the bigger holder, we want everyone to have an equal chance to win.
But incentivized holding mechanics that attract larger buyers is proven to stimulate trading activity.
As the cards acquired get more expensive, it makes holding a larger amount of the token attractive-->increase in trading activity.
More activity=more fees to acquire more cards.
If it was simply equal odds across any holding, there would be no real incentive to trade on the token, you'd just throw 20 cents in and have an equal shot, then as a result, there would be no activity or fees to build a treasury.
Hope this helps make that a bit more clear
doesn't seem a very fair game:
"Selection is random, weighted by holdings at the snapshot."