Surfing the Singularity • Software Architect for Hire

Western MA 🇺🇸
Based in United States
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
Rapidash 🔥
4
Fable 5.5 is going to be insane, any day now
21
promethean retweeted
One more thing: we’re halving the price of cache reads on Claude Sonnet 5.5, to $0.10 per million tokens. That makes Sonnet 5.5 around 20% cheaper to run on most long-running work.
130
209
5,022
274,940
Oh shit O_o
Replying to @claudeai
Haiku 5.5 is a significant step up over Haiku 4.5 across coding, computer use, and knowledge work.
1
43
promethean retweeted
Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5: the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model we’ve ever released. On average, it costs around 75% less to run than Claude Haiku 4.5.
994
1,662
24,945
1,440,266
promethean retweeted
We are publishing an update to OpenAI Problem #109 (integer multiplication) with a substantial further tightening: T(n) = O(n (log n)^(1 − κ)), With κ = 2⁻⁷⁸ (tightened from κ = 2⁻¹⁸²) Approximately 570 million fold improvement over our previous result and a 2¹⁰⁴ fold improvement over original OAI result. Our earlier ceiling applied to a cubic bottleneck in the network. The new witness scales quadratically; we haven't established a new ceiling. The key was using nonadjacent axis swaps to route around the cubic bottleneck. The original manuscript already supported nonadjacent axis swaps. Using them directly reduces layout routing from O(d²) to O(d) swaps.
We're publishing a result demonstrating a substantial tightening to the results from OpenAI Problem #109 (integer multiplication). Conditional on OpenAI's algorithmic interfaces, our parameter and network refinements improve the exponent saving in: T(n)=O(n(\log n)^{1-\kappa}) from κ=2⁻¹⁸² to κ=5.8×10⁻³³ (between 2⁻¹⁰⁸ and 2⁻¹⁰⁷). This represents a nearly 2⁷⁵ fold increase in the algorithm's exponent saving parameter. We also establish a ceiling of κ<5.838×10⁻³³ for the stated network-counting family and cost inequalities. Our result exceeds 99% of that ceiling. Surpassing this ceiling would require improving the network bounds or cost analysis from the original result.
38
82
1,445
112,240
Claude taught me about the Alabama Paradox today. It is definitely possible to learn new information while vibe coding something out of your typical wheelhouse en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apport…
1
25
promethean retweeted
Justice for Gemini
Claude now works inside Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides, and those files also open inside Claude. In Google Workspace, Claude sits in a sidebar next to your file, reads what you have open, and edits it in place. You can approve each edit before it lands.
156
3,784
86,522
2,099,861
Claude 6.x is cooking
1
47
So are we just not talking about Optimus anymore or?
1
34
Our only limitation is electricity production
2
80
Replying to @bcomnes
Herding agentic cats
1
221
Gemini 3.8 Flash has some of the worst vibes I've experienced in a minute
3
180
Replying to @dank_herbert
wat mean
1
2
19
Replying to @OpenAI
Some hints of novelty
1
6
1,549
I burned through three 20x plans and honestly I was holding back
67
Replying to @st0nerpiss666
😘 🐽
1
6
Replying to @orphcorp
There are a lot of gorgeous beefy men at MIT
296
Replying to @protosphinx
I'm going to say no more than 2 years
2
426
Medical acceleration
Google Deepmind just broke chemistry.. They open-sourced a model that can invent completely new biology from scratch. It’s called “AlphaProtein Novo” It's an AI pipeline that designs brand new enzymes for "new-to-nature" chemical reactions that have never existed in any living organism. to put this in perspective.. standard protein ai models (like alphafold) answer the question "what shape will this protein have?". ap novo answers the question "can i make a protein that does this specific chemistry?". the results from the paper are actually terrifyingly good: the ai designed an enzyme to synthesize piperidines, which are a critical building block used in pharmaceuticals and materials. this designed enzyme inverted natural biases to achieve near-perfect regioselectivity. it produced the chemical building block 99x more often than the competing natural product. it also designed an enzyme to hydrolyze DEHP, which is a pervasive plastic environmental toxin. this plastic-eating ai enzyme was 14-fold more active at 90°C than at room temperature, and survived in 75% acetonitrile. meanwhile, natural enzymes completely failed and were entirely inactive under those exact same extreme conditions. these new ai-generated designs are up to 60% smaller than natural equivalents. because they are smaller, they have a much higher mass density of active sites. i am speechless.. this is the holy grail of synthetic biology. we don't have to wait millions of years for microbes to evolve enzymes that eat our pollution or build our drugs.. we can just compute them on a gpu today. the ai's success rate in finding functional designs actually matches or surpasses traditional natural sequence screening. and deepmind open-sourced the whole thing on github.
58