RENEWING PROTESTANT® • Teaching, correcting, and calling God's people back to pure Bible truths that renew the mind • Reviving the spirit of true Protestantism

In Greek: Peter = Petros (πέτρος) → a movable stone, small rock Rock = Petra (πέτρα) → a massive immovable foundation Jesus does not say: "You are Petra, and upon this Petra…" He says: “You are Petros, and upon this Petra I will build my church." They are not the same word. The "rock" is not Peter, but something else. Petra in Scripture always refers to God/Christ, never a human. "The Lord is my rock (petra)" (Psalm 18:2) "That Rock (petra) was Christ." (1 Corinthians 10:4) Christ is the Petra, the foundation. Peter is only a petros, a stone. Jesus had already identified the "rock." The context explains it: Peter’s confession: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." (v.16) THAT is the "rock" Jesus refers to, not Peter himself. Protestants didn’t invent this: Nearly every early Church Father understood the rock as Christ or Peter’s confession.
477
350
2,626
379,213
Search the Scriptures retweeted
Jesus did not direct worship toward a mountain, an image, a relic, an ice or a sacred location. He said the true worshipers would worship the Father “in spirit and in truth.” (John 4:23) When truth governs worship, sincerity alone is not enough; worship must agree with God’s revelation.
9
10
45
742
"Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life." (Psalm 23:6) David looks toward the future with confidence. Why? Because he has learned the character of his Shepherd. God's goodness is not occasional. His mercy is not temporary. His faithfulness does not disappear when circumstances change. "It is of the LORD'S mercies that we are not consumed, because his compassions fail not. They are new every morning." (Lamentations 3:22–23) Yesterday's mercy is evidence that today's God remains faithful. And today's mercy gives us confidence for tomorrow.
1
6
125
Search the Scriptures retweeted
"My cup runneth over." (Psalm 23:5) David does not merely say: "My cup is sufficient." He says: "My cup runneth over." God's goodness exceeds bare survival.But biblical abundance should not be reduced to material wealth. A person may possess little materially and yet have a life overflowing with God's peace, grace, wisdom, love, and presence. Paul understood this principle: "Having nothing, and yet possessing all things." (2 Corinthians 6:10) The richest life is not necessarily the life with the most possessions. It is the life that has God.
5
8
30
566
When you see the global religious masses weeping before her statues, marching in her processions, and petitioning for her global coronation, you are not looking at historical apostolic Christianity. You are looking at the foundational architecture of the Final Counterfeit, a system that uses the vocabulary of the Gospel to construct a global goddess that obscures the solitary glory of Jesus Christ. The call of prophecy remains a matter of absolute personal alignment: "Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen." (1 John 5:21) nitter.net/i/status/2099530400913…
1 million French people singing Salve Regina with Pope Leo XIV at Place de la Concorde This is where King Louis XVI was martyred in the French Revolution
15
7
41
1,887
Search the Scriptures retweeted
Not a single apostle ever attended mass on Sunday.
"Catholics didn't write the Bible, the apostles did!" brother, the apostles were Catholic
49
5
60
3,894
Search the Scriptures retweeted
The deepest deception is not making people stop believing in God. It is teaching them to approach God through something that quietly takes the place of Christ. That is why the gospel continually redirects the sinner: away from self, away from human authority, away from images and back to Jesus.
7
5
31
3,326
The familiar can become invisible. We can repeat a doctrine so often that we stop asking whether Scripture actually teaches it. Familiarity creates comfort; Scripture creates examination. Sometimes the most important question is the one we stopped asking long ago: “Why do I believe this?”
3
3
12
339
A religious title cannot make a human being infallible, and an ancient office cannot make a doctrine divine. Authority must ultimately answer to revelation. The question is never merely, “Who said it?” but, “Did God really say it?”
9
6
32
762
"And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads." (Genesis 2:10) In the heart of Eden flowed a river. It did not begin in the garden. It flowed out of Eden to water it. The source was above the garden itself. Life in Eden depended upon a continual supply from its source. Without the river, the garden would wither. This is no accident. Throughout Scripture, water becomes a symbol of the life that comes from God. The psalmist speaks of "the river of thy pleasures." The prophets describe waters flowing from God's sanctuary. Jesus cried, "If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink." And the Bible closes with "a pure river of water of life... proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb." The lesson is clear. Life is sustained only by remaining connected to its Source. Branches do not produce their own sap. Streams do not create their own springs. Neither can the soul sustain itself apart from God. Many try. They search for satisfaction in success, pleasure, possessions, or human praise. Yet every earthly stream eventually runs dry. Only the river that flows from God can satisfy the deepest thirst of the human heart. Notice also that one river became four. The blessing God gives is never meant to be hoarded. It flows outward. So it is with the gospel. The grace we receive is meant to refresh others. The truth that blesses us is meant to be shared. The love of God is not a stagnant pool. It is a living river. Stay near the Source. Drink deeply from His Word. And let His life flow through you into a thirsty world. "For with thee is the fountain of life: in thy light shall we see light." (Psalm 36:9)
3
1
13
384
The most subtle corruption of worship is not always the rejection of God, but the redirection of devotion toward something created. Scripture continually calls us back from the creature to the Creator. True worship becomes clearer when every lesser object disappears and Christ alone stands at the center
1
1
21
402
John writes: "And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority." (Revelation 13:2). This single verse summarizes nearly three thousand years of prophetic history. The Papacy Is the Successor to the Kingdoms of Daniel 7. The symbols are not new. John borrows directly from Daniel. Daniel saw: • A lion (Babylon) (Daniel 7:4) • A bear (Medo-Persia) (Daniel 7:5) • A leopard (Greece) (Daniel 7:6) • A dreadful fourth beast (Rome) (Daniel 7:7) John reverses Daniel's order. Daniel looked forward, John looked backward. Daniel watched these kingdoms arise one after another while John sees them united into one final religious-political power. The papacy inherits the characteristics of every previous empire. • Like Babylon, she seeks religious supremacy. • Like Medo-Persia, she legislates worship. • Like Greece, she spreads her influence across nations. • Like Rome, she combines political authority with religious power. This the climax of human rebellion against God's government. The dragon gives the beast his Power John says: "The dragon gave him his power..." Who is the dragon? "That old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan." (Revelation 12:9) Thus, Satan works through papal power to deceive the world by setting a counterfeit form of government opposing God.
13
2
28
882
Search the Scriptures retweeted
When you walk into the grand, ancient apparatus of Roman Catholic, your eyes, ears, and emotions are flooded with a majestic "show of wisdom." The architecture, the incense, the Latin phrases, and the centuries of tradition create a profound psychological gravity. It feels entirely right. But the Apostle Paul stands at the gates of that system, holding up the mirror of Colossians 2. He asks you a single, piercing question: Is your salvation anchored in the absolute, total, and finished sufficiency of Jesus Christ alone or are you relying on a highly complex, humanly devised system of "will-worship" to save your soul? If your church requires a parallel authority to explain away the plain text of Scripture, you are not holding the Head. You are holding the institution.
Finally, Paul addresses the rigid, legalistic codes that often characterize highly institutionalized religions like the dietary restrictions, the mandatory celibacy of the priesthood, the holy days of obligation, and the mechanical performance of penance: "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances, (Touch not; taste not; handle not; Which all are to perish with the using;) after the commandments and doctrines of men?" (Colossians 2:20-22) Roman Catholic specializes exactly in these external regulations. They command you to abstain from meat on specific Fridays; they forbid their priests from entering the holy covenant of marriage; they map out strict canonical steps for absolution. Paul grants that these rules possess a massive psychological appeal: "Which things have indeed a show of wisdom in will-worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh." (Colossians 2:23) They have a "show of wisdom." They look incredibly disciplined, profoundly spiritual, and intensely devout. But the verdict of Scripture is devastating: it is nothing more than "will-worship." It is a religion manufactured by the human will to satisfy human pride. It makes a person feel righteous because of what they have abstained from, what they have touched, or how many rituals they have meticulously checked off.
6
6
24
794
Not a single apostle ever attended mass on Sunday.
"Catholics didn't write the Bible, the apostles did!" brother, the apostles were Catholic
49
5
60
3,894
Show one apostle calling Sunday the Sabbath, offering the Mass as a propitiatory sacrifice, or praying to Mary. Acts shows them in the temple and on the first day breaking bread. It does not show the Roman system.
6
7
205
Search the Scriptures retweeted
Replying to @23wjohnston
"She took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. And the eyes of them both were opened." Genesis 3:6–7 So Genesis 3: They ate - their eyes were opened. Luke 24: Jesus broke bread - their eyes were opened. But nobody would argue that Genesis 3 establishes a sacred eating ritual because their eyes were opened afterward. The phrase "their eyes were opened" is not a biblical formula for instituting worship. More importantly Luke tells us why their eyes were opened. Luke says: "And their eyes were opened, and they knew him." Luke 24:31 Then immediately: "And he vanished out of their sight." Luke 24:31 Their recognition of Jesus was supernatural. The text does not say: "Their eyes were opened because the bread had become His literal body." Nor does Jesus say: "This is now My body; therefore worship Me through this bread." The passage says they recognized Him. And notice what happened before the meal: "And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself." Luke 24:27 The emphasis of Luke 24 is not establishing a new weekly worship day. It is Christ revealing Himself through Scripture.
5
1
7
148