The phrase “two-state solution" has hit a wall of political paralysis. For Israelis, the term has become politically radioactive in current geopolitical discourse. For Palestinians, it has become synonymous with the corrupt, ineffective governance of the Palestinian Authority. The framework itself has become so diluted that many can no longer fathom even discussing it. It’s a branding problem. Some advocates push, nobly, a “one-state” model - one state with equal rights for all. But this ignores basic realities on the ground: After decades of dispossession, Palestinians require a space in which they can express their unique national identity - while Israel will never voluntarily surrender its Jewish demographic majority. A single state satisfies neither group's fundamental needs. A more pragmatic framework is the “two-nation solution”. It steps back from immediate border disputes to simply reaffirm a commitment to the need of two separate nations for two separate peoples. This reframing recenters the conversation on the fundamental right of both Israelis and Palestinians to self-determination, security, and cultural expression, rather than toxic political branding. Two nations can cooperate where necessary, but remain separate when needed. Just because a two-state solution feels difficult to implement right now doesn't mean we abandon the principle of two self-determining peoples. The "two-nation" framework keeps the two-state reality alive without getting trapped by its baggage, allowing Israelis and Palestinians to build a future defined by dignity, sovereignty, and realistic co-existence.

Post-October 7th, Israel's aggressive security posture toward Gaza will continue for the foreseeable future - regardless of who serves as Israel’s Prime Minister. Our Director Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib demands that the onus is on Hamas to expedite ts political and military exit to remove excuses for the ongoing crisis. Thank you to @The_Newsmakers and @trtworld for having Ahmed on to share his analysis.

Both Israelis and Palestinians believe they're right. They can both be. There is space for multiple truths. Reducing a complex conflict into a zero-sum binary locks both peoples into a cycle of mutual erasure and endless hostility. Both Palestinians and Israelis hold deep, legitimate claims that do not have to exist in perpetual opposition. Recognizing the rights, heritage, and existence of one group does not negate or delegitimize the other. Their legitimate claims are not mutually exclusive. Dehumanization is the fuel that keeps this crisis burning. It is not a political concession to acknowledge the tragedy of lost human life - whether Israeli or Palestinian. Empathy must be the moral baseline for any sustainable future. Every advocate, observer, and activist in the diaspora holds an individual responsibility to change how they engage. We must detoxify this discourse and be willing to construct a shared, coexistent reality. We cannot remain perpetually stuck in a vicious cycle of hatred, incitement, violence, revenge: rinse and repeat. Peace requires radical pragmatism, mutual humanization, and a willingness to step outside the binary. We must break the cycle.

In 2015, I launched an initiative to build an internationally monitored airfield in Gaza to give Gazans real freedom of movement. What I encountered from the “pro-Palestine” movement was deeply shocking: they would rather keep Gazans trapped in a living nightmare than work with Israeli authorities. Their ideological purity tests trumped supporting pragmatic solutions that could help Palestinians - because improving life in Gaza would “make Israel look good”. That was the moment I divorced myself from their performative and utterly unhelpful “activism”.

Elections in a deeply fractured, destroyed territory is premature and unworkable. Decades of rigid factionalism have choked off independent political life across Gaza. Building a new Palestinian political class requires moving beyond factional politics and empowering Gaza’s professional class - engineers, doctors, academics and technocrats It is the only practical pathway toward developing credible, long-term Palestinian leadership. Thank you to @The_Newsmakers and @trtworld for having our Director, Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib on to share his analysis.

For years, Western media - fed by Al Jazeera’s inflated, romanticized depictions of “armed resistance” - bought into a dangerous myth: that Hamas possessed a “moderate political wing” entirely separate from its military apparatus. This was a deliberate fallacy designed by Hamas to insulate itself from accountability. By "separating itself from itself," Hamas effectively outsourced the heavy lifting of civil governance to the UN, international NGOs, and Western donor nations, while funneling hundreds of millions of dollars in stolen aid and extorted taxes straight into its own homicidal schemes. All while average civilians had no recourse to end Hamas control or its grip on society.

NEW YORK TIMES: "Hamas acquiesced to the Board of Peace’s demands. All the devastation was for nothing." nytimes.com/2026/09/04/opini…

In an op-ed for The New York Times, I argue that saving Gaza & its Palestinian people requires resisting Hamas, weaving in personal themes, addressing issues with the Left & "pro-Palestine" movement & proposing a vision for Gaza's future Transformation. nytimes.com/2026/09/04/opini…

When measuring progress in Gaza progress against concrete variables on the ground - sustained aid access, physical security, and operational reconstruction - Trump’s 20-point plan has already stalled. Grandiose rhetoric celebrating “diplomatic breakthroughs” means little when actual implementation on the ground is still stuck on the barest of scaffolding. Thank you to @The_Newsmakers and @trtworld for having our Director, Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib on to share his analysis.

Two decades of Islamist rule has systematically rewritten the everyday vocabulary of Gazans, physically normalizing its “armed resistance” narrative by renaming every roundabout, street and building after martyrs, militants and missiles. Daily life was turned into a subconscious indoctrination machine. Rebuilding Gaza will require dismantling Hamas’s physical and psychological infrastructure of terror.

Gaza’s reconstruction will stall as long as an armed faction retains control. Despite Hama’s PR moves and leadership shuffles, the group has attempted to adopt Hezbollah’s governance model—relinquishing day-to-day civil administration while hoping to maintain control from the shadows. This remains the primary obstacle to Gaza’s recovery. International reconstruction capital will not flow into the territory if they risk subsidizing a terror group. Before anything can start moving, Hamas must commit and begin steps toward full demilitarization. Thank you to @The_Newsmakers and @trtworld for having our Director, Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib on to share his analysis.

Sami Jamal Al-Shannat raised £55,000+ ($72,000) to evacuate his family. GoFundMe deducted 3.9% and notified Sami that it does not support payouts in Gaza - so he nominated his brother-in-law in a supported country to receive it, trusting him to pass it on. The arrangement collapsed. The brother-in-law never sent the full amount, and Sami's family are still in a displacement camp. His experience highlights a fundamental vulnerability in humanitarian crowdfunding. GoFundMe is not alone in restricting where funds can be paid. Crowdfunding platforms must adhere to international banking regulations, anti-money laundering (AML) laws, and jurisdiction-specific sanctions - severely limiting where money can be sent. As a result, people in crisis - often in warzones - must rely on individual intermediaries, turning financial transfers into precarious trust experiments. It is a compliance bottleneck that leaves victims with zero recourse when things go wrong. There is nothing Sami can do. Once a crowdfunding platform transfers money to a nominated beneficiary, its legal obligation is complete - they offer no legal support or recovery mechanisms. If the third party refuses to pass the money on - that is the recipient’s problem. For Sami and his family, with no funds to hire a lawyer, they are simply back to square one - as wartime inflation drives up the cost of living. International sanctions and de-banking policies are designed to target rogue regimes and armed groups. In practice, however, they frequently punish the vulnerable unintentionally - choking off legitimate humanitarian support for civilians in crisis zones. When formal financial rails are severed, desperate populations are forced into unregulated, unauditable, unsafe secondary channels. Charities, aid organisations and non-profits have wrestled with the problem of reaching people who cannot access the financial system for years. Legitimate opposition groups, independent journalists and human rights groups are often paralyzed without means of accessing external funding. When the financial system cannot reach people in crisis, the system must be re-evaluated. The existing banking model relies on too many intermediaries, too many custodial gatekeepers that overcomplicate cross-border funds transfers. What’s needed is a fundamental redesign of the architecture of trust. Emerging payment alternatives - such as direct Bitcoin transfers and decentralized verifier protocols - allow funds to move directly to recipients without passing through third-parties. Shifting trust to community verifiers rather than payout custodians keeps campaigns legitimate while ensuring recipients retain direct control of their funds. Sami’s story proves that raising money is only half the challenge - getting it to those in the greatest need, safely, is what matters. While the next generation of humanitarian crowdfunding tools bypass much of the legacy compliance bottleneck, they do not solve everything; regulation still remains essential in keeping campaigns accountable, transparent and trustable. But they do represent a legacy system ripe for transition.

Roughly NIS 17 billion in Israeli banknotes are trapped inside Palestinian bank vaults across the West Bank. These shekels are just sitting there idle - taking up space, costing money to store and insure, and cannot be used. $5.5 billion is effectively missing from the Palestinian economy, frozen outside the financial system. Unable to lend, invest or pay Israeli suppliers, the West Bank’s economy is slowly suffocating - and it is hitting Israeli balance sheets. The 1994 Paris Protocol built the Palestinian economy around the shekel. But banknotes only hold value when moved and digitally cleared by the Bank of Israel - a repatriation process requiring Finance Ministry indemnity waivers. The system worked tolerably: cash flowed freely; Palestinian firms imported and grew, Israeli businesses got paid - and both governments collected tax revenue. The PA became Israel’s third-largest export market, with 53 billion shekels exchanged in 2023 alone. But recently, the system broke down. Israel cancelled the indemnity waiver entirely and has capped quarterly repatriation deposits to half of actual trade volumes. Construction firms, food exporters, fuel suppliers and technology companies depended on Palestinian purchasing power. But when cash cannot enter the banking system, businesses can’t borrow, banks can’t lend, and commerce slows for both sides. If Palestinian banks cannot process payments, Israeli vendors go unpaid. Analysis from the Atlantic Council, the International Crisis Group, and the World Bank all reached the same conclusion: Financial isolation only increases the risk of terror financing. Cutting off regulated banking channels drives transactions underground - creating the exact unregulated, opaque financial environment that impedes scrutiny. Israel’s own security establishment understands how self-defeating this is - the IDF, Shin Bet and Mossad have all reportedly opposed the waiver cancellation. Israel has a profound interest in a functioning Palestinian Authority. Economic collapse undermines PA governance and legitimacy, threatens continued security cooperation, fuels discontent and violence - and creates a vacuum ripe for Hamas to exploit. A stable Palestinian economy is a prerequisite for Israeli security, not a concession to it. If Israel unlocks the NIS 17 billion, the potential returns for the Palestinian economy are substantial. The action plan is straightforward: Reinstate and implement Multi-Year Waivers: End short-term extensions that maintain systemic volatility. Align Repatriation Caps: Match quarterly limits to actual commercial trade volume. Independent Audits: Utilize G7 and US Treasury review mechanisms to ensure compliance and auditability. October 7th taught Israel many things. One of them should be this: Ungoverned, desperate populations on your border are not a source of security. This crisis is solvable. It requires no new foreign aid, budgetary commitments, treaties, territorial concessions or diplomatic breakthroughs. Israel simply needs to let its own currency flow home.

Historically, Palestinian society was pluralistic, culturally rich, and diverse - defined by poetry, music, commerce, and secularism. Religious extremism was Hamas’s addition, not an inherent trait. Hamas systematically erased that heritage by imposing the Muslim Brotherhood’s rigid ideology onto Gaza, mutating Palestinian identity and centering it entirely on martyrdom, armed struggle, and death. All 2 million Gazans are often seen as a monolithic, radicalized caricature that actively supports terror - or they are characterized as passive victims to be pitied. But Gazans are real human beings, not numbers. Even if they cannot say so out loud, that pluralism of views still exists beneath the surface.

As Gaza enters its reconstruction phase, which monetary and financial architecture can best support recovery and sustainable development? Avia Liberman and @MelSRobbins examine four currency arrangements: atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth…

One Telegram message posted by a Gazan in June 2026: “My Jawwal Pay wallet won't activate. Is anyone else having this problem?” Within minutes, replies start streaming in: “Try updating the app.” “Go to this office.” “You need to verify your ID first.” “Mine started working yesterday.” In a post-war economy, when access to physical banknotes becomes a rarity, mobile wallets have emerged to fill the void. Digital payments have become intertwined with aid distribution across Gaza - shifting from a modern convenience to a mandatory gateway for buying food and medicine. When the system goes down, the consequences are immediate. One unreceived SMS verification code, a failed app update, or a frozen account - every technical problem creates another day of waiting for vulnerable families. Every technical fix means another household can access vital supplies. Telegram chat groups have effectively turned into crowdsourced technical support channels - an informal survival network navigating digital friction in the face of constant uncertainty. In today's Gaza, an app isn't only an app. For most - in the midst of an economic crisis - digital wallets are the primary bridge between humanitarian aid and daily survival.

In war, the bombs are only the beginning of the crisis. What follows is the collapse of everything people need to survive. Stability. Security. Food. Water. Fuel. Medicine. All the basics. This is how an economy of scarcity takes root. An environment ripe for exploitation. Amidst the rubble, formal economic structures, traditional supply chains, and banking systems collapse. Surrounded by so much lack, desperation sets in. And a highly predatory, unregulated, shadow economy inevitably emerges to fill the vacuum. Its primary motive is not relief - but profit. Data and discourse analyzed from Gaza show that basic human necessities are increasingly diverted away from formal distribution networks. Instead, they are traded through volatile black markets where prices fluctuate wildly based on border access, checkpoint logistics, and artificial hoarding. In a crisis, immediate accessibility overrides all else. The inevitable result: Scarcity becomes power. Those who control these shadow markets gain far more than financial capital - they accumulate profound social and political capital as well. Fuel, medicine, food and cash transcend their value as commodities and become direct tools for control and authority. The compounding tragedy of this crisis extends far beyond poverty. Armed factions, black-market cartels, and profiteers begin to weaponize shadow markets to keep the population completely dependent on them for survival. Extreme economic desperation solidifies into an informal, permanent governing system. Extremism thrives on economic isolation and material desperation. A population trapped in a predatory war economy cannot build a stable, sovereign, democratic future. The only way to dismantle these predatory networks in Gaza is by the systematic restoration of formal commerce, civil governance, and economic normalization.

“Has anyone received the 1,250 shekels yet?” — Gazan telegram message, June 2026 This single message is a Gazan family’s food supply for the month. A large section of Gaza’s daily Telegram traffic is simply focused on survival. Daily life increasingly hinges on the digital - from cash assistance and mobile-wallet activation, to identity verification for aid distribution. Every day, families chat with their communities about necessities: Have payments arrived? Are mobile-wallets working? Did registration go through? Was eligibility approved? Humanitarian aid in the 21st century relies on a fragile digital pipeline: A functioning smartphone Active mobile data or Wi-Fi Digital ID authentication A vendor with cash on hand If a server glitches, a mobile network drops, or a password gets lost, the link breaks. Relief stops. Digital finance re-routes how hardship is experienced. A technical error means a family waits another week for food. If there is no physical cash in the register to withdraw, a mobile wallet app is pointless. The future of humanitarian aid is about reliable digital and financial infrastructure - just as much as trucks being allowed across the border. This is Radical Pragmatism.

When formal institutions collapse, digital infrastructure steps in to fill the vacuum. From crowdsourcing medical referrals to ride shares and aid logistics, messaging apps like Telegram have transformed into informal public utility networks. The rise of digital mutual aid via informal peer-to-peer survival networks is resilience in action - but it is also a clear indicator of severe institutional failure.

International attention often moves around ceasefires, diplomacy, regional security, and the future of governance. We at RFP believe it’s important to prioritise more practical needs inside Gaza: whether households can access water, electricity, fuel, food, income, medical care, sanitation, aid, safety, and a place to live. According to a recent PCPSR report, water is the only basic service available to a majority of Gazans. Seventy-six percent reported access to water; 45 percent to internet or mobile service; 22 percent to indoor plumbing; 9 percent to electricity; and 6 percent to fuel or cooking gas. Eighteen percent had access to none of these services. Food access is being hampered by both supply challenges and high prices. More than half of Gazans report going without food on some days. The reasons for this are split between insufficient supplies in markets and stores, and insufficient financial resources. Though food costs have come down from their astronomical peaks during the war, sources report that overall prices are still about triple pre-October 2023 levels. Aid reaches many people, but not predictably. Among those whose main source of material support was aid, only a small percentage are receiving it regularly. The main obstacles are insufficient supplies, long lines, insecurity around distribution points, distance from aid sites, lack of transportation, and movement restrictions. The collapse of work is just as visible. In the PSPSR survey, 69 percent of respondents reported losing household income, and 62 percent reported job loss. The World Bank says Gaza’s productive sectors remain largely paralysed under the ceasefire, with unemployment reaching 78 percent in 2025 and reconstruction needs estimated at $71.5 billion. Medical care and personal safety have become daily household concerns. Across Gaza, families are navigating injury, illness, grief, and displacement while the health system remains severely depleted. Hospitals and clinics continue to operate under extreme strain, with shortages of medicines, equipment, laboratory supplies, and basic consumables. Even where healthcare resources exist, many families are unable to access it. The household priorities are plain: shelter, food, income, water, education, protection, and medication. These are the needs Gazans ranked most urgently. Any serious political plan, including a future two-state horizon, has to be gauged against the basic requirements of daily life: whether families can live safely, access services reliably, earn income, receive care, and rebuild functioning civic institutions.