Southern history • Federalism • States’ Rights Writer & veteran. First book on a lost tradition out Q1 2027 “all we ask is to be let alone”

Mississippi, USA
Calhoun is treated as radioactive. Read this anyway. No one stated the rule for dividing the powers more clearly or more honestly. "In deciding what powers ought, and what ought not to be granted, the leading principle undoubtedly was, to delegate those only which could be more safely, or effectually, or beneficially exercised for the common good of all the States, by the joint or general government of all, than by the separate government of each State; leaving all others to the several States respectively." p. 200
4
1
30
473
A grandiose handle requires more care in posting or you look like the actual fool! The quote is Clay, not Calhoun.
3
149
Eric Foner-Historian: "The idea that the South was under military rule and military occupation is really a myth." Wager Swayne-Union General: "It was hoped that the good sense of the people of Alabama would soon relieve them from the necessary results of military occupation..." New-York Tribune February 06, 1866
3
7
62
937
Elmira’s Confederate death rate was 24.5%. Andersonville’s Union death rate was 28.7%. Henry Wirz the Andersonville commandant was hanged in 1865. Nobody at Elmira was ever charged. Elmira Military Prison, Library of Congress, 1865.
23
28
249
6,005
Lincoln destroyed the voluntary Union and broke the Constitution to do it. His beatification makes that difficult to see.
Essay Lincoln’s Grip I was in Washington DC in December of 2022 with a man I had never met. We walked from the Ulysses S. Grant Memorial to Arlington National Cemetery. On the way we stopped at the Lincoln Memorial. My companion was uncomfortable. He clearly did not want to go inside. Such a grand memorial was an affront to his view of what America should be, to put it nicely. I sympathize with this view but don’t feel it in the core of my being as this gentleman did. There are other Americans who believe that Abraham Lincoln embodies all that is good about America. He freed the slaves and saved the Union. He came from humble beginnings. He was honest and smart. Anything he might have done that was unconstitutional, he did to save the Union. There was no alternative to the war either. Lincoln could not let States secede or the Union would no longer exist. He had to stop that from happening. Lincoln had no choice. Many of these Americans are successful, productive, and knowledgeable citizens. They are critical thinkers and are not afraid to have contrarian views. Not when it comes to Lincoln though. The discussions or debates about Lincoln can usually be summarized with two questions. Those who think Lincoln was one of the worst presidents will answer one way. Those who think it is right Lincoln is sitting on a throne in a huge memorial answer another way. Was Lincoln justified in deciding to use military power to force the seceded states back into the Union? The Lincoln admirer will answer that he was. States cannot leave the Union “unilaterally” is the way many put it. They might also say something about the Confederates firing the first shots. The key is the strong belief that the Union is paramount. They often add that if states can decide to leave it would be chaos and anarchy. The other side is that Lincoln ended the voluntary Union. Only nine of thirteen states were required to form the Union under the current Constitution. There is nothing in the Constitution that prohibits secession, so he should have let the states go. He had no Constitutional obligation to keep the Union the same size. His obligation was to defend the Constitution. The chaos or anarchy argument misses an important point. Don’t you want the central government concerned about each State or section and operating as if a State or section could choose to leave? What keeps the center in check if there are no consequences for incompetence or worse? Did Lincoln violate the Constitution? The biggest Lincoln supporters will say unequivocally that he did not. Harry Jaffa was in this camp. The clearheaded in this group will admit that he did, but that he had no choice. If he had not utilized the tactics he did, more States might have seceded. Thus, he was justified. Some are very open on the topic and say that Lincoln changed the Constitution. Noah Feldman describes it as going from the “compromise” to the “moral” constitution based on Lincoln’s actions. He believes Lincoln’s actions were justified. The Lincoln is not a saint crowd highlight the numerous violations of the Constitution and believe that ends do not justify means. We can’t allow presidents to decide what they will and will not abide by even in an “emergency”. There is a word for that. If the Constitution does not provide enough emergency powers for the executive, then amend it. I have empathy for the Lincoln admirers and understand that if your vision for America is one indivisible nation with an all-powerful center, then Lincoln is key. My allegiance was always to the United States before a community or State. My father was a career military officer. I did not have a State. I admired Lincoln. I have thought for a long time that citizens are better off when services are provided locally. I also liked how States had different characteristics, laws, and even cultures. My views on Lincoln have changed for two key reasons. First, Lincoln played a leading role in creating the gap between where we are now and my understanding of what the founders had in mind. Second, the war was avoidable if Lincoln let the seven States go. #USHistory #Lincoln @mcroles
4
6
108
1,853
“Every American who ever lived, with the exception of one group, was either an immigrant himself or a descendant of immigrants.” --John F. Kennedy Settlers found a country. Immigrants join one. The people who wrote the Constitution were not joining America.
3
6
35
536
It is hard for people today to see that a consolidated nation is as fatal to the old Union as secession was. Calhoun did.
1/4 We were bequeathed a federal republic by the founders. John C. Calhoun warned that there were two things "equally, destructive of such government." He explains below. Short 🧵
1
5
34
441
Washington state could not have built the Grand Coulee Dam. The federal government could and did. The Bureau of Reclamation still owns and operates it. Was it overreach or is it an example of the general government properly doing for the states what they couldn't do themselves?
1
6
207
John C. Calhoun explains why the Constitution was federal and not national. He goes to great lengths to explain the evidence that supports his opinions. His writing is clear and accessible. He writes to persuade and teach and often repeats things to ensure it is understood. A Disquisition on Government, 1851, p113
2
33
448
Grand Coulee Dam tonight. The largest hydroelectic plant in America. Larger than Hoover Dam. Built from 1933 to 1942. No slaves were used in its construction. It accelrated agricultural and industrial development of the PNW.
1
1
10
219
Robert E. Lee testified before the Joint Committee on Reconstruction in 1866. It is hard for people today to understand secession and loyalty to a state. It comes across plainly here.
24
77
1,052
45,075
Spent the night near the Naches pass in the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest. Got up early and took this outside of Ellensburg. My grandmother called Washington God's country.
1
1
13
229
This piece provides insight into the mindset of many Virginians prior to Lincoln taking office and secession. The writer is reacting to politicians taking liberties with the definition of "coercion". Hard to read it all and think the "war" was about slavery. Richmond Enquirer, Feb 28, 1861
6
1
24
356
"It may be recalled that during the opening days of the war, slaves captured by the Union forces, were returned to their disloyal masters. Here there is sufficient evidence in the concrete that slavery was not the avowed cause of the conflict." —Charles H. Wesley
3
2
33
312
I'm in the Renton, Washington Walmart. Just saw an African immigrant walk out with merchandise he did not pay for. There's more stuff locked up in this Walmart than in my local Walmart in Mississippi!
2
19
283
Referring to Thomas Jefferson and his allies, John C. Calhoun writes: They assumed the name of the Republican party. Its great object was to protect the reserved, against the encroachments of the delegated powers...And hence they were often called, "the State Rights party." A Disquisition on Government, 1851, p352
2
2
57
1,073
19th century Northern bank boards acquired and sold thousands more slaves than Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, Patrick Cleburne, and A. P. Hill combined. The modern telling of slavery is political hackery meant to solidify hatred of the South.
2
9
47
499
A "Yellow SLAVE, named TOM" ran away in New York in November and ads were run on Feb 12, Feb 26, and Mar 4 to find him. Imagine, Tom was on the lamb as New Yorkers were reading Hamilton, Madison, and Jay discussing the new Constitution where the slave trade would exist for 20 more years. The Poughkeepsie Eagle, Feb 12, 1788
3
19
292
Founding father and prominent New Yorker, John Jay, bought and sold slaves. He sold Dinah in 1801 when he could have freed her. Robert E. Lee never bought or sold slaves. Lee is vilified and the average person does not know who Jay is!
5
7
72
737