Supporter of the senior club in the city. dad. business owner and under no circumstances should you ever buy the sun #jft97 #efc

liverpool, UK
Jamie Rowland retweeted
He knows it. I know it. You know it. The cartel sharing trophies didnt want City or any other club in it. Just the 5 now sharing trophies. Just the 5 allowed to buy honours.
8
9
71
4,131
Just remember investing in your business Cheating. Diving around the pitch faking injuries weekly with the help of VAR fair play 👍 You need to sell players you can afford because it’s cheating. Over a billion in debt ok because they were good once fair play👍 Gaslighting
106
40
243
7,806
Jamie Rowland retweeted
The cartel have finally achieved what they strived for with their very last throw of the dice. The drawbridge is up now. For ever. Goodbye competition. A sad, sad day for English football 😢
180
8
73
43,832
At the current rate of growth, it’ll take Newcastle between 20-27 years to get to turnover levels of the top 4. Assuming they don’t grow that is. The rules prevent them from using investment and it’s wrong.
Let’s get this straight. In order for our multi-billionaire owner to spend as much as Manchester United on wages and in the transfer market, we’ve had to break financial rules. Just let that sink in.
3
1,641
Yes and city take them to a proper court under anti-competition laws.
My biggest hope from this is that it throws a spotlight on the protectionist rules and creates a wider discussion and awareness of how utterly corrupt the PSR rules are, and what we need to do to solve it. #mcfc
361
No, I don’t think you understand my point. Businesses are allowed to work in an openly competitive world. If investment is provided, they can spend it to improve their business. For some reason, when city et al gained investment, football ‘rules’ closed the door. Why?
Replying to @rowloefc
I don't think you understand. Those clubs did inflate fees, yes. Even Arsenal spent 22% of their revenue on Bergkamp. Would be a £200m+ signing today. But these clubs did it with their OWN MONEY that they could afford, and no rules were broken. Manchester City built an empire on fraud. And the successes they've seen in the last 8 years are a result of that. Utd weren't cheating. Arsenal weren't cheating. Liverpool weren't cheating. They earned money and spent it.
1
1,428
So what you’re saying here is, in business, you can’t have investment. You can only earn what you spend? Think about that one. Businesses can accept investment, it’s part of open competition, which is legally protected. The premier league bans it through these rules. Why?
Manchester United and Liverpool earned their money from revenue and winning. They are not the same as Chelsea and City. Chelsea were a cup team at best and I didn't even know there was another Manchester club when I was a kid.
505
Ding ding ding we have a winner. He seen my point and then lost it. The rules weren’t in place Until they suited the premier league rich clubs, then they were.
Replying to @rowloefc
The rules you broke weren't in place. They were brought in because of you and then you broke them. That is why Newcastle havent just been able to straight spend 1-2bn without a care. Different times, different rules. You broke them. Deal with it
3
5
2,007
Jamie Rowland retweeted
Replying to @rowloefc
Imagine comparing buying 1 player to years of cheating 😂 what a fanny
1
2
1
937
Jamie Rowland retweeted
People are saying it like Man City were cheating on the pitch that’s why they were winning. 1. Financial information — 54 charges From 2009/10 to 2017/18, City were accused of failing to provide accurate financial information to the Premier League. This particularly concerned: revenue, sponsorship, income, operating costs the club’s overall financial position 2. Player and manager payments — 14 charges City were accused of failing to properly disclose the full amounts paid to players and managers between 2009/10 and 2017/18. 3. UEFA Financial Fair Play — 5 charges City were accused of failing to comply with UEFA’s financial regulations/FFP rules between 2013/14 and 2017/18. 4. Premier League Profitability & Sustainability Rules — 7 charges They were also accused of breaching the Premier League’s own profitability and sustainability rules (PSR) during 2015/16–2017/18. 5. Failure to cooperate — 35 charges City were accused of not properly cooperating with the Premier League’s investigation, which ran from December 2018 to February 2023. But I keep seeing people talk about it as if the charges prove that City won all those Premier League titles because they cheated on the pitch. There is no charge here saying City fixed matches, bribed referees, manipulated results or illegally influenced individual games.
🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Manchester City found guilty on virtually all charges relating to breaches of Premier League financial regulations. #MCFC expected to appeal against verdict issued by independent commission. Sanctions undecided, process ongoing @TheAthleticFC nytimes.com/athletic/7049721…
1,221
933
5,389
1,096,510
Did they break the rules? Yes. Are the rules fair and commensurate with open competition? No. Challenge the protectionist rules, not the rule breakers.
𝗠𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝘆 - 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗱? 🪦 It’s not about the cheating. Sure, they smuggled hundreds upon hundreds of millions of owner funding into the club, disguised as sponsor revenue (as well as paying staff and overheads off-book) gaining a huge illicit advantage that meant they could outspend all competition. Yes, it’s what enabled them to cheat their way to all that tainted silverware and fully corrupt the integrity of the league. But you know what? If the League earnestly believed they could rein in Man City with regular sanctions, I think they would do. Hell, if Man City had plead out at the start, they might have got away with a mere relegation. But it’s about how they responded to getting caught that means these owners won’t be permitted to remain in the League. After the initial Der Speigel leak, Uefa went for them, at pace. Man City refused to cooperate or share evidence. Uefa sanctioned them. At CAS, Uefa shat the bed and Man City were let off. But shortly after that, Der Speigel leaked more emails which demonstrated Club officials and senior business leaders had lied - committed perjury - to get Man City off. They were caught with their pants down; their shame out there for everyone to see. No ambiguity. No missing context. Clear as day. They cheated and lied about it. Yet when the Premier League sought to investigate, again, Man City refused to comply. So the League took them to arbitration to force them. Man City lost and yet they still refused to comply. Instead, they took the matter to the High Court and Court of Appeal… and lost twice again. Only then did they comply (whether they’d tried to sabotage the original evidence by then, who knows - I’d put nothing past them). Throughout, Man City have demonstrated a total preparedness to corrupt the integrity of the competitions they are in and a refusal to accept the authority of the leagues to protect that integrity. Instead, they sought to conduct highly expensive lawfare to evade justice. You cannot allow such a powerful, malign actor to be part of your collective. They’re simply too dangerous. You just have to expel them. That’s why I have suspected the Independent Commission will recommend expulsion and sufficient clubs would vote for it. What could save them? A sacrifice. A fall guy. Someone that can take all the blame and walk away. The thing is, there are very few people who this could credibly be. Based on the leaked emails, it would have to be the entire executive for sure as well as Simon Pearce. But also, one of Khaldoon or Mansour. Given Khaldoon’s been put front and centre with the media for dealings with world leaders lately… and Mansour has basically been hidden away, with hit pieces out connecting him to the genocide in Sudan… I don’t think it’s a stretch to believe Mansour would be the one taking the bullet. Take the fines, compensation claims, stripped titles, and relegation on the chin and agree to sell the club to prevent expulsion. One or the other it must be. And hopefully, this summer, not next.
2
1,146
Jamie Rowland retweeted
City have been deceitful. No doubt about it at all but why? Because the other FIVE so called big clubs have wanted it all their own way. Pass the parcel each season. The Premier League is broken. Hope it falls to it's knees. Just wait for the legal claims to come.
28
9
116
6,227
Jamie Rowland retweeted
30 years ago those rules weren't even in place. They protected Man. United, Liverpool, Arsenal and Spurs. City had the balls to go against it. Thank-you City.
98
80
1,048
16,678
Hahah the way they’ve set up a fake account to have a go here 😂 fuck me.
Replying to @rowloefc
Jamie don’t be a dumb fat fuck. This is around fraudulent accounting, breaching rules and failure to comply not about “they spent big money on a player”. But perhaps you are as dumb as you are fat. Bitter retarded blue
1
773
We have a winner. He’s exacerbated my point but missed it. Rules weren’t in place, right up until other clubs dared to challenge the perceived status quo and then…rules were in place 🤔
Replying to @rowloefc
lol when Liverpool signed Collymore there wasn’t FFP rules in place. You cheated and have been caught.
1
602
When we lost players to United we were told to know our place and get back in our box. When we lost them to city, we were told it was an outrage and we shouldn’t be bullied by billions and complain.
316
The traditionals enjoyed free rein in the pay-to-win premier league. Right up until other clubs got rich owners. Then they brought in rules to stop them in a bid to keep the status quo & close the door on those clubs. They even had a G14 Euro cabal until Chelsea challenged it
4
4
12
951
2009-2018 city came to the fore. With Chelsea. Disrupted the status quo & suddenly rules were applied. A clear attempt at hindering competition in the game & business. It’s been a pay to win league since the outset. ‘They’ didn’t like others muscling in, altering the product.
Liverpool signed collymore for £8.5m, the average transfer fee was £1.59m Man Utd signed Verón for £28.1m, the average transfer fee was 3.36m Chelsea signed hazard for £32m when he average fee was £6.1m. I could go on The ‘top 6’ have been at it for years, city just got caught
1
421
Liverpool signed collymore for £8.5m, the average transfer fee was £1.59m Man Utd signed Verón for £28.1m, the average transfer fee was 3.36m Chelsea signed hazard for £32m when he average fee was £6.1m. I could go on The ‘top 6’ have been at it for years, city just got caught
571
102
917
327,702
City guilty of ‘nearly’ all charges. They’ll appeal straight away and despite there having been years to decide what to do about it, the sanctions haven’t been decided. The @premierleague is a complete mess. This is just shambolic.
3
1
7
938