Both sides agree that Hakimi and the woman met at his home that night.
After that, their accounts diverge.
The woman alleges that what began consensually became non-consensual.
She told investigators that Hakimi forced sexual contact on her and that she contacted a friend during the encounter, who later came to collect her.
Hakimi's position has been the opposite.
He has consistently denied rape and said the encounter was consensual.
His lawyers have also challenged aspects of the complainant's account and pointed to evidence they say supports his version.
Investigators examined messages, witness statements and other elements of the case.
In February 2026, an investigating judge ordered Hakimi to stand trial, finding there was sufficient evidence for the case to proceed.
The decision was appealed.
Then, on 19 June, the Versailles Court of Appeal confirmed that Hakimi should face trial.
His lawyers appealed again.
And on 23 September 2026, France's highest court for criminal matters rejected that appeal.
That does NOT mean Hakimi was found guilty.
It means the legal challenge against sending him to trial was unsuccessful.
His lawyer, Fanny Colin, stressed that the Court of Cassation had not ruled on whether Hakimi was guilty or innocent.
Those questions will be examined at trial.
The complainant's lawyer said her client remains determined to see the case through.
Two people.
Two versions of the same night.
And now, after more than three years, both sides are heading toward the courtroom.