Payment infrastructure for global businesses. Receive, move, convert, settle, accept, and spend money across borders in fiat or stablecoins.

stealth
Businesses no longer need a new payment system to accept stablecoins. We’ve raised strategic investment from @movement_xyz on this bet Just add stablecoins. Keep everything else go: stableyard.fi
54
26
160
24,205
stableyard retweeted
We have integrated @stableyardfi into MoneyMoves. Stableyard provides stablecoin payment infrastructure that makes it easier to move stablecoins across different chains and payment rails. For MoneyMoves, this means we can support more assets from more chains and give users more ways to receive and move crypto directly within MoneyMoves. It also gives us a stronger foundation as we expand our B2B and B2B2C infrastructure. More assets. More chains. More ways to move money.
9
7
22
201
Busting 5 Stablecoin Payment Myths that are costing businesses money: myth 1: you need to become a crypto business. fact: you don’t. stablecoins can work quietly underneath while your work with your existing currencies. myth 2: your team needs to understand chains, gas & crypto. fact: the infrastructure handles the wallets, chains & gas underneath. myth 3: customers & suppliers must accept stablecoins. fact: they can pay using the methods they already use. myth4: suppliers need crypto wallets. fact: they can receive local currency in their bank accounts. myth 5: stablecoin payments are completely free. fact: they still involve conversion, compliance and payout costs, but fewer middlemen can mean lower fees and faster settlement. in some high-cost corridors, moving $10,000 can cost $400–$700. businesses don’t need to adopt crypto. their payment infrastructure just needs to work better. that’s what we’re building at @stableyard. pay globally. settle locally if you wanna know more, let's chat stableyard.fi/contact
9
293
MSMEs are getting killed by cross-border charges and delays. over the past few months, we’ve been speaking with businesses dealing with: > delays that choke cash flow > high cross-border charges( 4-7%) > money getting stuck between banks these businesses already operate on razor-thin margins. on a $10,000 cross-border B2B payment: > total charges: 4–7% > money lost to fees and FX: $400–$700 > settlement can still take days and cost is only one part of the problem. stablecoins don’t make the entire flow free. businesses still need conversion, compliance and local payouts. but used underneath the payment flow, they can connect global money with local payment rails while removing unnecessary layers. that’s what we’re building with Stableyard >get paid globally. >move value through stables. >pay suppliers locally. >settle in the currency you prefer. if your business is dealing with this, dm us. pay globally. settle locally.
SEA trades $4 trillion (approx.) in goods every year. (🇸🇬 🇮🇩 🇵🇭 🇻🇳 🇹🇭 🇲🇾 ) And that is before you count Payroll, remittances, vendor payments marketplace settlements. But the money behind all this trade still moves badly.
2
5
188
stableyard retweeted
SEA trades $4 trillion (approx.) in goods every year. (🇸🇬 🇮🇩 🇵🇭 🇻🇳 🇹🇭 🇲🇾 ) And that is before you count Payroll, remittances, vendor payments marketplace settlements. But the money behind all this trade still moves badly.
1
4
10
809
Looking to connect with people from: @FireblocksHQ, @DinersClub , @blackbird and a few other teams working across wallets, cards and merchant payments. Ideally looking to connect with someone on product partnerships. We’re working on a few new distribution and payment opportunities at @stableyardfi and would love to explore where the right technology or product partners can fit in.
1
2
11
465
SEA trades $4 trillion (approx.) in goods every year. (🇸🇬 🇮🇩 🇵🇭 🇻🇳 🇹🇭 🇲🇾 ) And that is before you count Payroll, remittances, vendor payments marketplace settlements. But the money behind all this trade still moves badly.
1
4
10
809
Stablecoins make the movement faster. But stablecoins alone aren’t the solution. Businesses still need to collect money, pay suppliers and employees, convert currencies, and settle into local accounts.
1
1
39
What’s missing is one business platform connecting stablecoins with local banking and payment rails. > Pay in globally. > Pay out locally. > Settle in fiat or stablecoins. We’re building it for Southeast Asia. Coming soon. dm @stableyardfi for early access and inquiries
1
35
Stableyard is coming to token2049 singapore 🇸🇬 (ft @0xavinash & @Rjparab) if you’re building in stablecoins, fintech, settlement, defi or payments, let’s meet. would love to exchange cool ideas & market insights. also: shill us the side events we absolutely shouldn’t miss dms open.
TOKEN2049. 3 weeks out to the world's largest crypto event. 7-8 October, Marina Bay Sands
2
9
1,290
It's just @stableyardfi
It's not: "crypto vs banks" It's just fintech.
3
167
3 most important things we learned after talking to businesses and merchants: > businesses want to choose where their money lands > they don’t want to spend hours fixing payment issues > they need to know what each payment was for
(lack of) settlement may be the missing link for crypto payments adoption. cuz right now, most crypto payment solutions are just someone sending money and someone receiving it. that’s it. but there’s a lot more to a payment than that. we found this out while talking to businesses about why they don’t accept crypto payments. 3 important things we learned were: 1/ businesses want to choose where their money lands they want the money in the account they use, in the asset they want. that could be stablecoins or fiat in a bank account. if they have to manually move and convert every payment, you’ve added work to their day. 2/ they don’t want to spend hours fixing payment issues if someone retries a payment, they shouldn’t get charged twice. if they need a refund, you should be able to send it back without chasing them for a wallet address. 3/they need to know what each payment was for a transaction hash doesn’t tell the finance team which order was paid, what’s still pending, or whether a refund went through. these are normal things businesses expect from a payment system. they don’t go away because someone paid with crypto. the customer picks how they pay. the business picks how it gets paid. that’s what we’re working on with stableyard’s new update. coming soon.
3
188
Fragmentation is worse in traditional finance than in crypto. Every region has its own banks, networks, currencies, and payment rails , creating delays, fees, and extra costs. Stablecoins can become the common settlement layer that connects them all.
Payments are evolving. Old rails are not automatically safer just because they are familiar. The real question is who can make funding, settlement, FX, and spending work as one system. movementnetwork.xyz/article/…
2
12
327
stableyard retweeted
overheard in SEA 🇹🇭🇻🇳🇵🇭🇮🇩 that stablecoin card users are transferring money to Dope Pay to finally live/pay like locals in Southeast Asia.
3
2
39
1,089
make stablecoin actually usable users spend merchants get paid and the rails work underneath.
Replying to @stableyardfi
@stableyardfi has seen strong growth for @dopepayme in Vietnam and the Philippines. That matters because it shows the network can support both sides of the transaction: merchants and users.
2
7
211
people pay how they wanna pay merchants accept how they already accept we handle the complexity underneath. one account. any wallet. any supported chain.
local stablecoin payments only scale if merchants don’t have to change how they work. they shouldn’t have to deal with: >multiple chains >different addresses >wallet fragmentation but we also can’t build another closed loop where only certain wallets or chains work. so the solution to this is abstraction. at Stableyard, we’re building Universal Payment Accounts (UPAs). one account identity that can accept payments across supported chains and wallets, then settle to the merchant’s chosen destination, in stablecoins or fiat. people pay how they wanna pay merchants accept how they already accept we handle the complexity underneath. one account. any wallet. any supported chain.
7
234
the whole “stablecoins are cheaper” thing is NOT always true. fx spreads can make stablecoin payments just as expensive as traditional payment rails. the cost starts adding up from > on-ramp: converting your local currency into stablecoins > off-ramp: converting stablecoins back into local currency, which can get really expensive in markets across asia, especially southeast asia > the sandwich: EUR → USDC → BRL means you’re basically paying for two fx trades, not one transfer > and even when there’s “no fee”, the markup is usually sitting somewhere inside the exchange rate that’s why picking the right stablecoin provider matters. you need competitive rates, but more importantly, you need access to a strong network of stablecoin businesses and users so you can move between stablecoins without constantly paying for another conversion.
1
4
350
stableyard retweeted
The hardest part of stablecoin payments is no longer moving dollars onchain. It is making them usable in the local systems people already rely on to get paid, pay suppliers, and run a business. The last mile is where the real infrastructure work is.
3
14
41
10,930