Both Communism and Nazism are socialism.

Hitler appropriated the word socialism to rob the popular appeal from the left. He was not a socialist, a marxist, or a leftist in any sense of the word. Rightoids tend to from the left, because our ideas are more appealing to the average working people. Same thing Javier Milei is doing with the word "anarchism".

Wrong. This is a made up claim by socialists to disassociate themselves with Nazis. 100% leftwing invention He was not Marxist, his socialism was modeled after Lenin’s reforms to socialism. Define leftwing and provide an example of a leftwing govt. go

.......Hitler hated Lenin. And Lenin's vision of socialism is an extension of Marxism. So to say he didn't like Marx but modeled his socialism from Lenin is funny.

So, Lenin hated other commies. That literally means nothing. The subject is the system of govt, not personal feelings you DF. The fact is fascism is modeled by Gentile (who loved Lenin) after Lenin’s socialist reforms.

Lenin didn't hate the one philosopher that created his ideology. Hitler hated both, because he didn't believe in Marxism or in class warfare. He wanted something different: it was race. In fact, he modeled most of his laws after the United States' Jim Crow laws.

Nazism was race, but that doesn’t define fascism. Nazism is simply fascism with a German national supremacy aspect. . In the U.S., only the left enforced racist laws and engage in race politics. Same as Nazis.

Incorrect. It absolutely does. The central and core tenet of fascism is race above everything else. And ""the left"" weren't the ones who enacted Jim Crow laws or prohibited white men to be with another black person in a loving relationship.

Not one fascist ever made this claim. Ever. It’s a leftwing construct but it also would make fascism leftwing. Because only the left practices race based politics and policy. Yes, that was the American left. The American right was individual liberty and freedom. Idiot

And ""the left"" doesn't practice race-based politics. They just bring racial issues in the west because they affect people. Not because they want to live in a society centered around race. If it was up to us leftists we would abolish race, because it's a social construct

Race based politics by any other word is still race based politics. They bring racial issues, so did Hitler. A grievance movement based on race. Hitler did the exact same but pitted the Germans as victims of other races and nationalities.

Hitler wanted to establish race as a core value. The left wants to destroy the idea that race defines who we are. We bring up racial issues because we need to have conscience of the problems that the black and nonwhite proletariat faces because society isn't a blank slate. Our material conditions are different. The end is to abolish race as a whole.

They call the right racist because we treat everyone as an individual, not a group. Hitler judges based on race. Like the left. Hitler brought up racial issues for the same reason. You are exactly like him

I'm sorry, but that's just a lie. You don't treat anyone as an individual. The right IS the most racist group in the US, and you only pretend to be racially unbiased when you're absolutely not. Every single major sect of the right wing believes to some degree in racial superiority, because you refuse to address the issues that nonwhite people have historically faced despite the fact that US has never been racially obsolete society. It was founded by white supremacists who viewed blacks as inferiors. And for the last 250 years, politics has orbitted around white people's interests and racism. Apart from Nazi Germany, Israel, and the British Empire, you are the most racist country to have ever existed on this planet.

Incorrect. And you can provide zero examples. I can show you many. Jim Crow, democrats. Discrimination back in 1900’s and today, democrats. Kkk, democrats. Segregation, democrats. Basing hiring on race, democrats. Voting based on race, democrats.

The political platform of the democrats when they introduced Jim Crow and solidified slavery was conservatism. Political platforms switched, especially during JFK's. The south has always been culturally and politically conservative. The term "the bible belt" refers to the states in the deep South who hold traditional christian conservative values. And those values have never changed. What has changed in the South is the political party that dominates that region. In the past, it was the Dems. Today, they're all governed by the GOP. And the South is still full of problems that haven't been resolved post-civil rights act. By the way, the civil rights act was passed by a democrat. JFK was also one of the first democrats to denounce the racism of other dems, like George Wallace. That pissed off white southerners who felt betrayed by the new Kennedy dems who became the main faction of the democratic party. JFK received death threats from the KKK and ofher dems for his stance on racial integration and allowing blacks attend the same spaces as white people. This is because JFK was an economic and social progressive. He wanted to bring change. "Change is the law of life, and those who seek the past, or the present, are certain to miss the future". That doesn't anything like what democrats believed at the peak of Jim Crow. That sounds more like what Republican hacks like you hate about the Dems. And today, it's the GOP that is full of Neo Nazis, KKK members, and racists who would've agreed on a lot of things with Hitler.

lol! No, it was big govt bs, leftwing. Yes, democrats were more socially conservative back then, they didn’t dry hump each other in the streets. But their politics radical race based politics and slavery. Nothing that has ever been on the conservative platform.

They were socially conservative and politically conservative. The whole point of wanting to protect slavery is because of their primitive ideas of protecting "private proverty". The ideas of John Locke, Adam Smith, and the US constitutionalism influenced the arguments in favor of keeping slavery. That, and the fact blacks were viewed as less than animals. So, no. That's not leftism, little one. Put a socialist and an 1860's democrat on a table, and they would be up in fists in less than a minute. So yeah, hat's conservatism, little one.

This is where your brainwashing is thorough. Conservative means limited to the constitution and D of I and strictly adhering to it. Thats conservatism gave birth to the anti slavery party slavery violated that document. That party was named the Republican Party.

The ideas of John Locke are literally what influenced Jeffersonian constitutionalism. Do you not know anything about your own country's history? Wow.

When are you going to name a country that existed with a govt you characterize as left wing, or socialist. When will you define left and right with govt policy and use of govt.. you know, based on what the terms are actually identifying?

The countries that with governments I view as left wing were all ravaged and toppled by US imperialism, even though, unlike Lenin's USSR, they were voted in democratically. Chile voted for a socialist, and then he was killed by your CIA. So, no. I can't name any country with a genuine left wing government that has a degree of respect for rule of law, because all of them were either toppled by US imperialism or they were forced to become dictatorships precisely because of US imperialism.

So chile is the only leftwing govt? Everything else but chile is right wing politically?

Your reading illiteracy is astounding. How old are you? Are you a fucking boomer? I wouldn't be surprised if you were.

The stupidity of thinking you’re wiser than those older who did far better than you. Lol!

Because I am smarter than you, boomer.