Here is a kind of sign of the times in AI slop studies. Today I was trying to find the best version of a performance Jerry Lee Lewis and Keith Richards did on a TV special in 1983 of Chuck Berry's Little Queenie and when doing that I got served a video of Mick Jagger reminiscing ...
2/ about the people who'd meant most to him over his life. So I clicked. I confess I was taken in by it for two or three minutes. The voice is basically perfect. The recollections are filled with things that Jagger broadly might say. There's a lot of good B roll. I noticed from ...
3/ the beginning that the moments fo Jagger on camera the lips weren't aligned with the audio. But I dismissed this as some editing issue. But while I obviously don't know Jagger I've listened to many, many interviews with him in many contexts over the years ...
4/ and he simply doesn't talk like this. First, he doesn't talk for this long. Never. He doesn't just take a question and go off indefinitely on some disquisition like this. The copy was also much more introspective than Jagger is in interviews and yet also quite hollow and formulaic.
5/ What we often see in AI bait: the bland and platitudinous. So a bit into his memories of Charlie Watts (the first of his five) and I realized: this isn't real. Now, Facebook is absolutely filled these days with phony billboards of non-existent reunion tours and all sorts of ...
6/ really audacious totally made up stuff. But this seemed to take it to another level. So I looked at the video description and noticed it was from something called Golden FilmRetro with 11k subs. This video was uploaded a month ago and has almost a million views. So I got curious.
7/ With AI you can operate at scale. And holy fuck they're really operating at scale. Turns out David Gilmour, Townsend, Mick, Daltrey, Robert Plant, McCartney, Page they've all sat down for the same five people they remember most video. Weird! And they're not just targeting ...