Tweet 1:
Let’s be clear for the Kendrick stans: the interaction with Tia Owens was part of a pre-planned stage routine on Drake’s 2010 tour.
And no — he didn’t “pick” her.
Tia herself said:
“Drake’s entourage picked me… NOT DRAKE himself.”
⸻
Tweet 2:
The show was in Denver, Colorado, where the legal age of sexual consent is 17.
That isn’t “fan research.”
It’s in Colorado’s own legislative memo:
Receipt:
Tia was 17, meaning she was not a minor under Colorado law.
⸻
Tweet 3:
There was no off-stage contact.
No messages.
No relationship.
No pursuit.
No allegation.
Tia said it plainly:
“It was nothing then and still nothing now.”
That’s direct testimony.
⸻
Tweet 4:
The lines Drake said on stage (“I can’t be arrested,” “why your body look like that,” etc.) were performance dialogue he repeated across the tour.
They are theatrical expressions, not evidence of intent, attraction, or misconduct.
⸻
Tweet 5:
In legal terms, stage banter is not mens rea.
It carries no criminal implication.
Performers exaggerate, flirt, joke, and entertain.
A routine crowd-engagement script does not equal predatory behavior.
⸻
Tweet 6:
The hug, kiss, and flirtatious theatrics were standard stage blocking — public, choreographed, and repeated nightly.
This does not meet any legal element of sexual assault under Colorado law.
⸻
Tweet 7:
Tia herself confirms the performance context:
“Performers always bring up fans on stage… it’s part of their show.”
When the actual participant says nothing happened, that is legally decisive.
⸻
Tweet 8:
Legally and factually:
• She was of legal age
• Drake didn’t select her
• It was public & scripted
• No sex act occurred
• No assault occurred
• No allegation exists
• The state receipt confirms legality
• Tia debunks every narrative
Trying to turn a lawful stage routine into “predatory behavior” because of rap beef is not supported by law, evidence, or reality.