Doesn't change the fact that they collaborated with the British against the Caliph, a treasonous offense.
Replying to @SaraNajmaii
"low class" what kind of A-historic claim is this, they were, and are, rulers of najd region, while you are sitting you ass in NY paying taxes for the jewish elites, what a clown
1
68
you either mistaken them from the sharifats, or maybe you are out right retard, even the sharifats contribution to the war effort against the ottoman was, which is considered by historian, pretty insignificant comparing to that of britin
1
18
Please take your retardedness elsewhere, history exists for a reason
2
23
the agreement, was after the decline of the ottoman empire.
1
13
The agreement was in 1915, I'm not sure about what they teach you people but the ottoman empire didn't collapse until 1922 The house of Saud directly contributed to the fall of the last Caliph
1
22
i am the one who should ask you what they teach you in school, yes the house of othman declined in 1922, but the empire lost control of iraq, meccah, and the levant way before that, dumbass, and the treaty was about recognition of the saudi state by britain
1
18
The Saudi state didn't exist in 1915, the treaty contained a clause that guaranteed the house of Saud would fight against the ottomans, the ottomans lost control of mecca only a year after said treaty, facts are very very stubborn
2
27
Replying to @stfuasuku
you fucking idiot didn't even make the effort to hide the fact that is just right there, meccah fell to the hands of sharif hussain, not the saudies you dumb ass

Sep 23, 2026 · 11:52 AM UTC

5
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked