women when you tell them they can’t rape

Elon @elonmusk I have 160 k followers. This post was only shown to 15 k. It took me years to write this book. I am a key witness to the conspiracy against President Trump, and a professional historian. I assisted Special Counsel Durham for four years and have been trained by the investigators. This book is testimonial and document-based, as well as a great read. It's really important that the people read it before Brennan and other Obama’s other henchmen testify before the Grand Jury in TEN DAYS' time. This book is foundational. I announced it on @X to make sure the American people read the truth. I planned a series of videos and document posts around the release. I don't have a big publishing house behind me. Which means I could get the book out quickly and without censorship. But it also means I need everyone's support!

It's ok to come out.... as a One Nation voter 😂 #ComingOut #OneNation #Voter #PaulineHanson #TakeVictoriaBack

Our elections are unreliable and non-credible by design. Ask yourself why.

The @greens bang on about taking from the rich and starting class warfare but their leadership is rich. The new leader @DavidShoebridge and his wife had multiple multi million dollar eastern suburbs Sydney properties, at least until recently, as they would have been aware of the upcoming Budget broken promise on property that decimated the market, as the @TheAusInstitute Aust lobbied hard for Albanese and Chalmers to break the election promise. The @greens used their balance of power to get those lies through the senate. The @greens and @TheAusInstitute are tied together. @greens senator Sarah Hanson Young’s husband Ben Oquist stopped being CEO of @TheAusInstitute in 2022. It’s a think tank, their motto, ‘we change minds’, they have tax free charity status for this ‘charity work’ but won’t reveal major donors ‘to avoid scrutiny on them’. The Labor Charities minister @ALeighMP calls their new CEO Richard Denniss ‘my good friend’. He speaks at their events. So their tax free charity status is safe . The @greens & @AustralianLabor pretend to be independent. It helps overall votes. Ben stayed on the @TheAusInstitute board and started doing different lobby work in Parliament House on behalf of mining companies like Rio Tinto, and big tech like Uber. His wife @greens senator wife Sarah started using taxpayer money to fly Ben to Canberra as they had just got married and he couldn’t use the ‘charity money’ from the Institute for flights anymore. 50k taxpayer bucks worth of Canberra flights between 2022 and early 2026 for Ben to lobby on behalf of Rio Tinto etc until it was discovered. She then said she wouldn’t use taxpayer money to fly him to Canberra anymore, she said ‘it’s not worth the scrutiny’. She didn’t pay the money back. Always follow the money. The @greens are a scam.

Given women can't apparently give consent if they have had an alcohol beverage perhaps it's time to consider: - banning women from drinking alcohol - make it illegal for a man to buy a woman an alcoholic drink - remove liquor licenses to venue caught selling alcohol to women

💥Ralph Lorigo is an attorney in the USA. He sued 212 hospitals that refused to let patients try ivermectin. In the 72 cases he won, all but three survived. Lives saved - a 95.8% success rate. In the 140 cases he lost or couldn’t get to court in time, every single patient died. It’s worth repeating - EVERY SINGLE PATIENT DIED And one thing you can be sure of: the ABC, the SMH, The Australian and The Guardian, which all published articles mocking ivermectin, will never report this. Ralph Lorigo’s testimony makes it crystal clear: everyone involved in demonising and mocking ivermectin and denying doctors the right to prescribe it has blood on their hands. They are either directly or indirectly responsible for tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths. The health bureaucrats at the TGA who banned ivermectin, and those at AHPRA who persecute doctors, should be criminally charged with reckless negligence causing death and face lengthy jail sentences. Allison Langdon should hand back her Logies and make a public apology to the families of those who died from COVID after being denied access to ivermectin. She should then interview Ralph Lorigo and take up the cause of medical freedom, to ensure this mass killing of sick people by incompetent and/or corrupt health bureaucrats can never happen again. And those politicians who played politics over ivermectin — such as Chris Bowen, who described doctors’ claims that ivermectin was a successful treatment as “Conspiracy Craig’s medical disinformation campaign” — karma is coming for you in a big way.

There are 217 @WNBA players in the league and now I’m speaking directly to all of you. I’m astonished. You play in a league and have a commissioner who cannot and will not define your gender and is embarrassing you in front of the entire world. Yet none of you have the BALLS to stand up for yourselves and say, “Enough is enough.” And that’s the whole point. None of you have balls, and it needs to stay that way. I guess biology is still pending committee approval. They’re trying to figure out how to define a woman in a way that fits their nonsense agenda. Deep down, I believe you don’t want a biological male entering your league and taking your minutes, your money, your endorsements, and your dignity. Are you all really that afraid of cancel culture that you would rather sacrifice your morals, values, and principles for money? If the #NBA commissioner came out tomorrow and said, “We cannot define what a man is,” there would be outrage and a protest among the players the next day. Open your eyes. #WNBA I’m not the enemy here. The real threat to women’s sports is not the one asking the question. It’s the silence of the women who refuse to answer it.

This is the most obnoxious piece of legislation ever dumped onto the floor of the Federal Parliament. It is the kind of power grab you would expect from a fascist or communist regime: handing government bureaucrats the authority to build an army of fake sock-puppet accounts to manufacture and pump out official propaganda. That is not online safety. That is state-sponsored deception. It’s an international embarrassment to Australia. It has sullied our reputation. Everyone involved in this grotesque totalitarian scheme has no place in public office. The eSafety Karen has demonstrated that she is an anti-free speech zealot - a sickening control freak, who wants to control what "the Australians" can hear, see and think - things the First Amendment would prevent her from doing in her home country. She is last person that should be given such powers. Instead should be sacked, and deported on the first plane. The minister behind it, Anika Wells, is a proven serial rorter of her travel entitlements. Combined with this bill and her arrogant demeanour, she has shown she is unfit to hold any public office. This is a hill to fight and die on. This legislation must be defeated. Even if you disagree with my politics, imagine your opponents holding these powers. Every Australian of all political persuasions needs to rise up and defeat this. To the barricades.

THE GOVERNMENT PUBLISHED THE RORT ON ITS OWN WEBSITE There's a page on the Department of Home Affairs site about a program called Supporting Multicultural Communities. Anyone can read it. Here is what it says, word for word. The Australian Government is investing up to $171.3 million over 3 years from 2025-26. This is in line with the 2025 election commitments. The program will be delivered through multiple closed non-competitive and one-off ad hoc grant rounds. Read that again. Closed. Non-competitive. You cannot apply unless the government invites you. And one-off ad hoc, which under the Commonwealth's own grant rules is the category usually decided by a minister. What the page does not say, anywhere, is how an organisation gets onto that invitation list. Now put it next to what I wrote a fortnight ago. The Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program was $560.9 million. Invitation-only. Non-competitive. Election commitments. More than 220 organisations invited. The department's own page says only organisations identified by the Australian Government will be invited, and when Parliament asked who did the identifying, the answer was that they had been identified by government. Where it went: 73.2 per cent, $409.1 million, to divisions notionally held by Labor. 22.6 per cent to Coalition divisions. Forty-five electoral divisions received nothing. Two departments. Two programs. Same year. Same mechanism. Three quarters of a billion dollars between them, handed to people who were asked, by a process nobody outside the building can see. The steelman is genuine and I'll put it properly. Election commitments are made publicly during a campaign, voters know what was promised, and a targeted round is simpler than an open competition for money already promised to a named organisation. The 2024 grant rules expressly permit closed, non-competitive programs. And this department runs open rounds too. Its Infrastructure for Multicultural Communities program puts $41.6 million through published guidelines and two application batches anyone eligible can enter. So this isn't a department that only does closed rounds. It's a department that does closed rounds for election commitments. And those same grant rules say better practice for a closed non-competitive process is to either name the eligible applicants or publish how eligibility was determined. Neither happened here. Fine. Then publish the list of who was invited, and why. Because right now the answer to how three quarters of a billion dollars was allocated is that somebody decided, and you're not allowed to know who or on what basis. Cold Hard Facts. Corrected when wrong. No misinformation. What's your thoughts…? Peter Lyndon-James 🇦🇺 Sources: Department of Home Affairs, Supporting Multicultural Communities Program page, and Infrastructure for Multicultural Communities page. Commonwealth Grants Rules and Principles 2024, paragraph 11.3. Centre for Public Integrity, Public money, political advantage?, September 2026.

MORE THAN A BILLION DOLLARS, AND NOBODY HAS TO SAY WHERE IT WENT I've spent months documenting that Australia's political money laws never require anyone to disclose where a dollar was spent. I thought that was an electoral law problem. It isn't. It's the whole system. Put the discretionary streams in one column. Major and Local Community Infrastructure, $560.9 million, one-off. Invitation-only. Forty-five divisions got nothing. 73.2 per cent went to divisions notionally held by Labor. Criteria never published. Supporting Multicultural Communities, $171.3 million over three years. The department's own page says closed non-competitive and one-off ad hoc rounds. How you get invited is not published. The Journalism Assistance Fund, $67.6 million over three years at $13,000 per full-time-equivalent journalist a year. Plus $33 million to AAP, a mandated minimum $3 million a year of advertising carved out for regional newspapers, and $204.1 million of campaign advertising in 2024-25 alone. The News Bargaining Incentive. Two government members told Parliament it should deliver $225 to $275 million a year to news businesses. Treasury has published no costing of its own. The Department of Finance, $55.8 million on the electoral register over its history, including $12.7 million to the major parties' research centres, filed as Other Receipt rather than public funding. And from January, election funding rises to $5 per formal first preference vote, indexed every six months, alongside a new quarterly payment to registered parties with a sitting member, and to independents. My finding on the electoral register was that you can see who receives and never who pays out. This is the same gap at the other end of the pipe. On the grants register the payments are itemised. You can see every dollar and every recipient. What's invisible is the decision. Who was asked. Who approved it. On what basis. So there are three points in one circuit. Money coming in, where six dollars in ten arrive with no payer named. Money going out, where no section of the Act requires itemisation. And government money going out, where the payment is published but the selection is secret. At no point in the whole circuit can you trace a decision back to a person. Now the part where I have to be fair, because I had this wrong when I first drafted it. Recipients are not unaccountable. The journalism fund requires expenditure reports and can demand an audit. The payments scheme carries penalties for failing to report. What none of it requires is disclosure to you. Treasury looked at this in November 2022 and decided against going further, saying it did not consider there was a persuasive case for regulating how news businesses use funding. That is their reasoning to defend, not a gap they missed. The rest of the steelman holds too. Every one of these streams has a defensible purpose. Communities need infrastructure. Journalism is collapsing. Parties need resourcing or they end up owned by donors. None of this requires anyone to have acted badly. That's what unsettles me. Nobody had to. Cold Hard Facts. Corrected when wrong. No misinformation. What's your thoughts…? Peter Lyndon-James 🇦🇺 Sources: Are in the comments below

If the Australian government moves forward with a law that lets it create sock puppet accounts that can influence online debate among its own voters, it would basically be operationalizing the plan proposed years ago by the husband of our last USAID chief.

11/ Greens Senator David Shoebridge revealed the political appetite for using the DDoC against political opponents. At a press conference, he said the Bill was needed so lawful messages from @PaulineHansonOz & @LiberalAus that he interpreted as hateful wouldn’t reach children.

The censorship industrial complex is going on the offensive. New legislation being field tested in Australia would give the government the power to run AI bot networks/sock puppets, apparently to secretly influence & manipulate online debates. Creepy af. H/t @NAffects @MikeNayna

I am a J6er. Had even one officer said, “Do not go in,” I would not have gone in. Had I seen one sign — one message from the largest PA system in the world telling us to stay out — I would not have gone in. Instead I watched city halls across the country, including Seattle, open up for BLM. Then I walked a handicap ramp into the Capitol while people were already walking in and out. No warning. No line I was told not to cross. No order I heard and ignored. For that I received a punishment harsher than anything I had ever seen handed to the other side. Liberals got $50 tickets. Conservatives got prison. That is not equal justice. That is a message. God Bless the J6ers!

Derek Chauvin > Arrested & restrained George Floyd > Sentenced to 22.5 YEARS in prison Q'Laundra Hood > Killed a pedestrian and then fled > Sentenced to 30 DAYS in prison

I’ve been dreading telling my friends and family that I’ll be voting for Trump in this coming election. There was no way for me to explain it to them without them being horrified. So I made this video, which tries to explain how liberals like me have ended up here:

Jake Tapper devoted his show virtually every night for two years to covering and spreading the Russia hoax. Then Tapper actually had the nerve to tell JD Vance that he didn't spread the Russia hoax. CNN and the people on that clown network should not ever be taken seriously.

My guide to lowering estrogen and aromatase activity covers foods, supplements, herbs, hormones and medicines. 100+ compounds and extracts across 300+ papers and reviews, with results, doses and when each may help. Link in the first reply.

As the Victorian Royal commission into construction corruption is about to kick off, those in charge of it must consider this. When the Dan Andrews Labor Government gained power from the Coalition in 2014, the first thing they did was tear up a contract signed by previous Govt and give a vast sum of Vic taxpayers money to European companies, to NOT build East/West road link. Dan Andrews ‘this project is a dog, it doesn’t stack up’. He blamed poor value for money, among other things. The, most likely, real reason was that in the contract, the CFMEU, that controls the Labor Party, were heavily restricted from the project, because The Napthine led Victorian Coalition Govt knew the CFMEU would catastrophically blow out costs. From 2014 till now, the Victorian Labor Govt have embarked on a gigantic amount of construction and placed the CFMEU in control of all major projects, and almost all smaller ones. Roads, train tunnels, stations, hospitals and so on, and almost every single project has blown out by millions upon billions upon more billions. Overseas project managers are completely shocked at how much Victorian Govt Builds cost. This has been a major factor in the extraordinary rise in taxes placed upon honest Victorians. Also a state debt vastly bigger than every other state, leading to a crippling recurring interest bill, while essential services in Victoria are being chronically underfunded. This has led to many deaths of honest Victorians in ways like, accidents because of severely neglected roads, heart attack deaths because no ambulance response in time, violent crimes because not enough police, and suicides because the financial stress of severe over taxation has pushed honest people over the edge. Every member of The Victorian Government since 2014 is complicit. Either likely directly corrupt themselves, too cowardly to speak up, or just unaware, because they were too lazy and well paid to care. The blame is also shared by all major companies involved in Victorian Govt funded building projects since 2014, and that includes the banks, who have provided financing. They all reap billions in profit. They all must know about the theft and must have always known. Why have they done nothing? Most likely because the motto is ‘Everyone eats on the Big Build’. The Dan Andrews/Allan/Carroll Labor Government sets up the contracts that way. There is no incentive for the builders to stop spending Everyone wins, except the honest Victorian taxpayer. They die on horribly neglected country roads. The theft continues in 2026 and will continue until courageous people take a stand. Those people will deserve a statue. It sure won’t be Albanese. He is best friends with Dan Andrews, is controlled by the same Labor left faction, and recently rushed through federal laws to ensure Federally funded Building sites follow the Victorian model. It beggars belief. This royal commission has a chance to stop it, if people with courage are willing to speak up, for once. Future generations will thank you long after you’re gone.