This has been my mantra for today. Feel free to use it too...
6
6
83
This person thinks that my wife doesn’t know anything about the subject of Assisted Suicide… 😬

ALT Betty White laughing

Ah, you must have missed her on @BBCNewsnight in 2008 opposing Assisted Suicide? Her 2 part @bbcworldservice doc in 2013 'When Assisted Death is Legal'? Assisted Suicide The Musical in 2016/17? Her @BBCone @OpenUniversity @RTS_media award winning doc "Better Off Dead?" in 2024??

ALT Betty White as Rose in The Golden Girls looks confused

3
2
305
jo church 😷 retweeted
Liz Carr has been an important and consistent voice in all of this bravely explaining what reality is like for disabled people and what this poorly written bill would have meant. Huge respect to her.
Campaigner and actor Liz Carr reacted to MPs rejecting the assisted dying bill by stressing the importance of care at the end of someone's life. She added, "We need to do that first - then let's have a gown-up conversation about this [assisted dying]."
23
451
2,754
68,195
jo church 😷 retweeted
Replying to @ddhitchens
I think the first word 'Opinion' sums up her misplaced worship for this ill thought out 'Assisting all to Die' bill. I see no compassion, no empathy, no wish to heal current care systems. Let her and big sister ghoul Leadbeater have their dark fantasy and let the rest of us live
1
11
210
jo church 😷 retweeted
Replying to @ddhitchens
The people not mentioned are the targets, right. The MPs, mentioned, are the enablers. Don't be Canada.
2
20
219
jo church 😷 retweeted
@thelizcarr I think your documentary "Better Off Dead?" should be compulsory viewing by all those MPs before another vote on assisted suicide. Keep going, hero!
4
33
280
jo church 😷 retweeted
On Friday the assisted suicide bill returns to the Commons It's acknowledged by many bodies as a bad law eg a Dr can suggest assisted suicide as an option to a patient The potential for coercion, mistakes & abuse is too great The only effective safeguard is for MPs to vote NO
19
433
947
10,161
jo church 😷 retweeted
Replying to @Lucy_Webster_
Because this is about ambition and ideology rather than ensuring a good end of life experience for people who are ill, terminally ill, dying, old, disabled.
1
4
45
1,526
“The Assisted Dying Bill may begin with the dying – but it ends with the vulnerable.”
There's a hard truth at the heart of the Assisted Dying Bill, and it cuts through every soft phrase and staged plea: once a state grants itself the right to kill the vulnerable "for their own good," it stops being a guardian and starts being an executioner. Canada proved it. Britain now stands on the threshold of the same mistake, telling itself it can build a clean, clinical path to death without it spreading to those who were never meant to die. The supporters of assisted dying sell it as mercy. They hold up terminal cancer patients and unbearable pain as the moral shield. But the moment the law is written, the shield vanishes. The language widens. The categories spread. What begins as a narrow doorway becomes a floodgate. Every country that has legalised assisted dying has drifted in the same direction – towards killing not the dying, but the despairing. And despair is something the NHS manufactures by the day. Sophie Turner, who has fought her own eating disorder, exposes the lie at the centre of Kim Leadbeater's bill: "terminal" can be stretched to cover anyone failed by a broken health service. In Colorado, women with anorexia were declared "incurable" simply because they couldn't get treatment. Their starvation was rebranded as a terminal condition. They were given lethal drugs while telling their families they wanted to live. But death was quicker, cheaper, easier. That is the road Britain is on. A failing NHS. Long waits for mental-health care. Clinics turning away patients because they're "not thin enough." In this world, the bill isn't compassion – it's an escape hatch for a system that can't cope. The danger isn't people begging for death, but a system nudging them toward it. The backers of the bill imagine calm autonomy – a rational adult choosing their fate. But eating disorders destroy reason. Depression lies. Trauma twists thought. These illnesses create the very hopelessness the law would interpret as "consent." To treat a starving girl's lowest moment as her settled will is not dignity; it is dereliction. It is the state shrugging and saying, "We cannot save you – but we can kill you." And now we hear talk of "Personal Navigators" – an NHS death service guiding people to the end. A bureaucracy with a timetable, ready to usher the vulnerable from first doubt to lethal dose. The National Health Service drifting into the National Death Service. Canada offers the warning in blood-red letters. Veterans offered euthanasia instead of therapy. Disabled people told their care was "too expensive." Homeless citizens seeking death because they couldn't afford rent. Doctors openly discussing "cost savings." It is the logic of a system that discovers killing is cheaper than caring. That is the lesson Britain must stare in the face. This bill poses as compassion, but its real engine is convenience. A country that valued life would fix palliative care and mental-health services instead of offering a state-approved exit. Sophie Turner, Gail Porter, Stephanie Waring – women who have lived through the madness of eating disorders – see what the legislators refuse to see. These are not "terminal" people. They are recoverable people failed by the system. That is why their intervention matters. They understand the darkness. They know what it is to want to vanish. And they know how temporary that feeling can be. Give these women this law when they were at their lowest, and they would not be here to speak at all. A civilised country heals despair. It doesn't weaponise it. The Assisted Dying Bill may begin with the dying – but it ends with the vulnerable. That is the truth Britain must face before it sleepwalks into a Canadian nightmare, dressed up as compassion but driven by a cold arithmetic: life is costly, death is cheap. "Sophie Turner, who has fought her own eating disorder, exposes the lie at the centre of Kim Leadbeater's bill: "terminal" can be stretched to cover anyone failed by a broken health service."
3
11
679
jo church 😷 retweeted
Sometimes it feels that 1 very simple fact is forgotten in the assisted suicide debate One mistake = the loss of life of someone who shouldn't have died Such a mistake is not less tragic or less culpable because someone is dying, ill, old or disabled Surely that makes it more so?
23
195
780
16,056
jo church 😷 retweeted
Replying to @BuDs_UK
As for "sabotage the democratic process"... ...didn't Kier Starmer promise her a vote on assisted suicide if he became PM? So no mention of it in the manifesto? Or the King's Speech? Just on a promise? Yup, that's democratic
3
37
154
2,672
jo church 😷 retweeted
Replying to @historykev
Every time I see this headline, I think "what about a nice photo frame or those smelly room diffuser stick things like most other mums get from their kids?"
11
38
370
6,403
Replying to @thelizcarr
Whenever government or corporate entities want you to think that you have a “minority” opinion on something, they always claim “the majority supports this!” Ive noticed this silencing tactic for many cultural issues. By the time research shows the reality, people already have their heels dug in, true or not
4
1
2
176
jo church 😷 retweeted
Campaigners for assisted suicide are fond of telling us it has "massive public support" I disagree & in my experience as an opponent of assisted suicide, the more people learn about the subject, the less they support it Have a look at my BBC documentary: bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0…
127
872
2,783
56,216
jo church 😷 retweeted
Hi @drkathrynmannix Do you know if anyone is gathering information on how many hospice beds, how many palliative care staff we're losing around the UK? I keep hearing of hospices losing beds due to cuts but am wondering about the bigger picture?
1
4
15
922
jo church 😷 retweeted
Replying to @ddhitchens
And regardless of that, whilst 300 million sounds like a huge figure, in fact it's less than 5% of the world's population So yes, less than 5% of the world's population have access to medically assisted suicide - it really isn't as widespread or accepted as we're led to believe
4
6
198
jo church 😷 retweeted
Replying to @ddhitchens
Of all the huge issues to be discussed eg ensuring a good death for ALL & not just those favouring assisted suicide, the 100,000 people a year dying in need of palliative care, the closure of hospices & lack of end of life care staff... ...some people prefer to talk about words?
4
33
116
12,924
jo church 😷 retweeted
In 2012 I met the president of Compassion & Choices - the USA version of Dignity in Dying She said that to legalise medically 'assisted suicide' you must 1st change the culture - including the language Assisted suicide is being rebranded as the more palatable 'assisted dying'
EXCL: Theresa May accused of being ‘deeply insensitive’ after referring to assisted dying as ‘suicide’ In a letter to the former PM, 13 assisted dying campaigners have denounced her language, saying they “listened with dismay” independent.co.uk/news/uk/po…
19
144
390
31,063
jo church 😷 retweeted
Replying to @factualmama @latsot
Assisted Dying has also long been Falconer Senior's dream. His own Bill was deemed unfit, so he has another bite at the cherry. In Better Off Dead, he tells Liz Carr to 'wait for after the General Election'. And that interview was filmed in 2023. It has long been planned...
2
6
20
395
Fuck me, my wife is STACKED! 😍 @thelizcarr
2
1
16
609