People like being offended online.
2
1
6
312
Cancel me. I need a fight.
6
2
15
601
not to “victim blame,” but if you snort ketamine off a dude’s dick I don’t think he’s wrong in assuming you’re dtf
620
2,099
90,620
6,112,630
RT @aladyvanished: when i got my POTS diagnosis my neurologist told me that i should absolutely not get involved with online communities fo…
1,931
Dario Amodei is at the desk to assure that the future of humanity is safe from AI
459
1,562
14,036
5,713,620
Abbie retweeted
SORRY BUT I’M DONE PRETENDING THIS IS JUST HOW PRICING WORKS NOW. A $20 meal becomes $29 after fees and tip. A $200 hotel room becomes $280 after parking and resort charges. A $99 flight becomes $200 after bags and seat selection. A $29,000 car becomes $34,000 after dealer fees and packages. And every company has a different explanation for why the extra money doesn't count as part of the price. Delivery fee. Service fee. Convenience fee. Processing fee. Facility fee. Protection fee. I DON’T WANT TO KNOW WHY THERE ARE 11 FEES. I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHAT IT COSTS. If the real price is $280, SAY $280.
198
1,137
8,787
243,868
Abbie retweeted
proud to say I’m debt-free if you exclude the mortgage
JUST IN: Anthropic says they’re highly profitable if you take out some of their biggest expenses.
32
515
15,489
315,714
How people who eat packaged processed foods look at people who eat fresh produce right now
9
3
48
3,926
Many are skeptical we’ll ever 'solve AI alignment.' If so — are we f**d? In our interview @bshlgrs argues that there are practical, non-galaxy-brained ways to reduce AI risk without knowing how to align AIs. This is 'AI control': finding ways to use advanced AI without knowing whether we can trust it. Enjoy — links and transcript below: 01:51 What's AI control and why is it hot? 10:44 Detecting human vs AI spies 18:10 How to catch AIs trying to escape 33:18 Cheapest AI control techniques 51:01 If we catch a model escaping... will we do anything? 53:39 Getting AI models to think they've already escaped 59:01 Will they be able to tell it's a setup? 1:16:13 The pitch to AI companies to do this 1:18:29 Will AIs get superhuman so fast that this is all useless? 1:30:39 Current alignment methods don't detect scheming 1:38:51 Is 'controlling' AIs kind of a dick move? 1:44:12 Could 10 safety-focused people in an AGI company do anything useful? 1:49:40 Benefits of working outside frontier AI companies 2:01:07 What other safety-related research looks best to Buck? 2:02:02 If an AI escapes, is it likely to be able to beat humanity from there? 2:09:22 Will misaligned models have to go rogue ASAP, before they're ready? Find it in any app searching for 80,000 Hours Podcast.
11
21
193
55,507
made this point a year ago True alignment between AGI and human interests is logically impossible because the arrival of AGI will itself transform what human interests are. Alignment, as it is being conceptualized/discussed today, assumes that there is a stable set of human goals, values, and interests to which AGI can/should be be aligned to. But the arrival of AGI would alter our institutions, incentives, relationships, capabilities, identities, and probably our understanding of what it means to live a worthwhile human life. In a world with AGI, potentially a world of post-scarcity (aka sustainable abundance), our social instincts: status-seeking, cooperation, competition, will have to adapt. Being human won’t mean what it used to. We are trying to specify today what humanity should want in a post-AGI world, even though AGI itself is one of the forces that will determine what humans in that world are like and what they will/should want. The paradox is therefore: We can align AGI only to pre-AGI human interests, but those interests may cease to be coherent once AGI exists. And we cannot align it to post-AGI human interests because, from our present position, those interests are not yet conceptually available to us.
4
4
50
3,431
Abbie retweeted
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
20,537
167,257
801,513
175,266,395
Destiny says testing all patients' blood would destroy the entire healthcare system "Is it a big deal to order a blood test every single time you go into the hospital? Absolutely not. Is it a big deal for every single patient that goes into a hospital to get a blood test? Absolutely. It would destroy our entire healthcare system." "You don't have the labs for it, you don't have the needles for it, the supplies for it. And one of the biggest reasons you start with symptoms for diseases is because reference ranges on hormones and blood levels are huge."
3
2
38
5,674
Abbie retweeted
Lindsay Clancy is OJ for white women
534
5,513
65,643
3,260,006
Oh my god.. this is the worst yet. Think of the kids as ceramic vases !!!!??( what the hell is@going on with people!!!!! ?? This is not ok at all. This is all sinister!
153
659
4,314
216,958
Please cancel me
4
1
7
305
The entire range of internet theories on Lindsay Clancy (in no particular order): - It was the meds. - It was the doctors. - It was the husband. - It was the current wife. - It was both the current wife and the husband. - It was the ex-wife and the husband. - It was post-partum depression. - It was post-partum psychosis. - It was schizophrenia. - It was bipolar I. - It was bipolar II. - It was a mineral deficiency. - It was narcissism. - It was sociopathy. - It was revenge. - It was the patriarchy. - It was feminism. - It was demon possession. - It was mold.
10
4
24
3,675
Life's better when someone's waiting for you like this 🐶🥰
416
3,997
51,439
1,276,196
Replying to @SamaHoole
You fast before a PET scan for 4-6 hours. Why? High blood sugar makes tumors harder to see, not easier. Your own circulating glucose competes with the tracer for the same transporters, so the signal gets diluted. The scan works best when your blood sugar is lowest. If sugar "fed" the tumor, the fasted low-sugar scan should be the faintest, instead it's the brightest and clearest. A tumor doesn't need the sugar you eat, it draws on the glucose, which you body controls and maintains anyway, regardless of what you eat.
8
3
37
2,253
Psychiatry
3
1
8
9,037
I don’t want to brag, but during my time as a science communicator, I’ve personally been accused of being the architect behind the Covid-19 pandemic, a paid shill for Big Pharma, both a sheep and a cult leader, “the face of evil,” and a CIA operative. I remind myself of these important roles when I’m taking out the garbage and doing laundry.
56
48
401
7,216