vou comezar a miña transición dunha plataforma a outra, podedes seguirme en bsky.app/profile/todomalva.b…

in the capitalist world today, 1 person dies of acute hunger every 4 seconds despite humanity producing enough food to feed 10 billion people.

Ojalá alguien hubiera descrito lo que es este sentimiento de conciencia de clase social ante la explotación que sufre por el sistema económico en el que vive hace ya unos 150 años. Ojalá alguien para no tener que llamarle "síndrome del tupper"

woke 2.0 is even more beautiful than i dared to dream

Hai moitas formas de ser galego e ningunha é en castelán. Fin do comunicado.

Estou algo asustado pola mastectomía xa que o método escollido foi a ginecomastia periareolar e non coñezo ninguen co meu tipo de corpo que a fixera, os únicos resultados que atopo son de xente moi delgada, se coñecedes alguen que a fixera e teña un corpo similar que me contacte

luzes.gal/06/01/2026/seccion… 🚨🚨 novo episodio novo convidado 🚨 🚨

The current "why do straight women engage with m/m relationships in media if not for fetishism?" conversation is so interesting to me because unless you have no reference to standard heterosexual relationships, at least one potential answer should be obvious. Sociological and psychological research, medical studies, relationship satisfaction stats, and even antcedotal reports and narratives, show that the emotional burden of heterosexual relationships is largely put on the woman. There is a gendered entitlement to care - men should receive it, women should provide it, with far less expectation of reciprocity. Having a relationship between two people of the same gender removes this specific issue. Why fictional m/m media, opposed to sapphic media, that could be argued to remove the same inherent gender imbalance? Straight women, by definition, are attracted to men. When a straight woman consumes heterosexual media the implicit expectation and interpretation is that she is attracted to the male protagonist, and is meant to live vicariously through the female protagonist. No one questions this. No one calls this 'fetishism'. No one suggests this is a moral failing. In fact, the underlying implication of this entire discussion rests on straight women being expected to only consume heterosexual media, not that they shouldn't consume any. Fictional m/m narratives, such as the ones this conversation has been largely centred on, offer love interests of the gender that straight women are attracted to, without the burden of societal expectations and power dynamics that come with a heterosexual relationship. They want to consume romance without the burden of expected subordination due to their gender. Of course there are many reasons women engage with m/m media, however from conversations I've had with straight women, this seems to be one of the most prevalent reasons. I do also think it is a conversation that should remain open. There are circumstances where gay relationships are fetishised. We, as an audience, shouldn't flatten gay mens voices or experiences. However, I'd argue rather than only asking, "why are women obsessed with m/m relationships in media?" we should start with, "why are women disengaging with heterosexual relationships and what does that say about society?"

Show me at least 5 recent news of fujoshis cornering a gay man on the street and beating him up/raping him. Show me them trafficking gay men. Show me them saying to a irl gay man that they are gonna rape him to make him straight.

Aquí el verdadero problema es que para usted si no es occidental no vale. No solo Tailandia está ofreciendo contenido, también lo hace Filipinas, Korea y si quieres venir para este lado del mundo Argentina y Brasil!! Ahh pero como ustedes solo se sienten representados por los gringos entonces no valen, entonces no es representación…. Sigan pidiendo que les den series, adelante pero mira como en los últimos años hay menos representación safica en esa industria

“i want more lgbt (f/f) shows so i’ll openly hate on lgbt (m/m) shows being funded and supported in mainstream media because i’m bitter. surely bigots will understand the difference”

i understand how some lesbians might resent m/m media because there’s generally more investment in it than f/f, but they shouldn’t be mutually exclusive. do you think that if they axed heated rivalry, that money would go into making a lesbian show instead?