The most influential man within a 20 ft radius, but only when alone.

Based in United States
Our night out star gazing a few weeks ago.
5
Replying to @Keoki1958 @maklelan
Example: There's no evidence that a large-scale slave population of Hebrews existed in Egypt. There is evidence that Egypt occupied the land of Canaan almost up to the first millennium BCE.
1
2
39
Replying to @NotEvolution1
Matter magically became self aware... Matter like dust? Is this another self own?
1
1
24
Replying to @NotEvolution1
We appear related via several different lines of evidence.
1
2
74
Replying to @atheistnightmrs
Bro trying to take on science all by himself...
2
24
Replying to @Hovind_Official
Last time I checked 12 million is more than 6 thousand. Is this a self-own?
1
2
55
They were objectively clean freaks. Real evidence says that the Cananite peoples are one of the oldest and that area was occupied by Egypt for long parts of its history (almost all the late bronze age). We have evidence of many wars fought in the area and letters between Egypt. youtu.be/F6rs78Sovfc?is=4f2Q…
13
Plenty of water *if* the land were different. How many "ifs" is this now? Every time there's a new if, there's a new mathematical absurdity required. Nuclear decay releases heat, but so does continent movement. For the plates to move into their current position from their original position in just a year... I'll just let you read it
1
12
Cute but this one is better
2
33
We know how much water the surface has. We know how much water is in the air. We know how much is locked up in ice caps. I've done the math, there isn't enough water on the planet. 7:11, etc is painting a picture of how the authors thought about the earths configuration. This matches roughly what the Israelites and neighboring peoples believed the earth system looked like. A disc, not a globe. This is not unique for the time. Egypt also believed in a similar configuration. Wasn't genesis allegedly written by someone raised as an Egyptian? At any rate, it's not an accurate portrayal of the earth system.
2
15
Replying to @NotEvolution1
You keep on ignoring the fact that you need this to happen.
23
Replying to @noahsarkscans
This should be interesting... 🤤
36
Cybertruck mattress is really cool. Self-inflating and self-vacuum sealing. Most sturdy)stiff air mattress I've ever experienced. So stiff it I might need to get used to it. Do not recommend sleeping on the bed of the CT with the gate closed if you are close to 6ft tall. Stretch those legs!
4
111
Creationists actually need this to happen because you can't fit every extant species on a tiny little boat. That said, we have witnessed single celled organisms become multi-cellular, animals become photosynthetic, and bacteria gaining important new features.
1
1
21
The shroud looks completely wrong for a burial cloth. What happens when you take a 3D structure and flatten it? You can simulate this in blender and that's what Cicero Moraes did last year. There are so many things wrong with the shroud claims that doesn't hold up to basic science. It would be cool if it was real. Scholars are in wide spread agreement that Jesus was a real person. The shroud however is extremely bad evidence that currently only demonstrates how gullible Christians are. Here's an example of a uv map when unwrapped. Notice the distortion?
1
18
Replying to @NotEvolution1
Creationists need evolution to make their ark story work.
12
Answer the question and stop dodging
1
34
3. Also a lie. Duplications have been observed and these duplicates have been observed to mutate. The lie here is how this content creator defines "information" in a non-standard way. It's a creationist-specific definition that excludes any and all undesirable bits of data. In the vulgar, a duplication is new information, any mutation is new information. This is a vernacular slight if hand. Creationists are not talking about the same things and are changing definitions to align better with their accepted dogmas
1
36
Replying to @DivinelyDesined
If you don't like evolution, come up with a better model that predicts fossils and harmonizes with radiometric dating, geology, molecular biology and paleontology. We are waiting...
2
16
You are laughably wrong. You should do a little research before displaying your ignorance all over the Internet for the entire world to see.
1
53
Replying to @DivinelyDesined
If there are beneficial mutations why can't it produce the genetic diversity we see today. What limits these benefits from building up over time?
2
Should be able to fit a 400W panel.uo there, but I want to make sure this little 200W does it's job.
47
For example, evolution predicts common ancestry. If there is common ancestry, morphology and genetics should show a nesting hierarchy or relatedness between species. When we compared genetic similarity, the nested heirarchy became apparent. Prediction met. Evolution predicted this. Intelligent design by separate ancestry was defeated.
1
10
It what way can gradual changes not result in larger changes over time? Creationists have never modeled the mechanisms that prevent these kinds of changes.
1
1
6
Columbia River
1
38
I asked how many of these were seaworthy without iron/steel reinforcement:
1
9
Replying to @NotEvolution1
What percentages of fossils are in inverted order? 1%? Less? The vast majority are in the order evolution predicts. Neither whale or horse transitional fossils are debunked. Creationists have failed to explain the through line features in the fossil believed to be transitional. - Living fossils have nothing to do with transitional fossils - polystrate fossils are extremely rare and well understood in fossils. Finally:
1
1
78
I might not be the stupid one here... Calling me a "cultist" is also laughable and commits the same category error as the OP. I'm arguing against the OP by calling out their admission that abiogenesis has at least been partially reproduced in the lab. I'm acknowledging the study you posted and clarifying how it applies to the OP's admission. The fact that you attacked me for supporting your post indicates *you* are likely the one with reading comprehension deficiencies.
1
14
Replying to @TheHistoryGuy07
Don't be fooled by this type of rhetorical manipulation tactic. The post is seeking to equivocate systems that are categorically different. One is, or at least attempts to be evidence based. The other is evidence resistant.
2
1
2
63
Replying to @NotEvolution1
1
1
2
62
Replying to @cybrtrkguy
How dare you 😭
18
Replying to @AgainstAtheismX
Also "not" random chance
3
Replying to @Tsar_Martyr
Lapu-lapu would like to enter the chat
1
15
Replying to @Tsar_Martyr
The Incans would like to enter the chat
1
9