Another calm cook. Going higher. Trade with me on @fomo fomo.family/r/bigbootymami

this is like ecom in 2016 these AI characters have gotten 100M+ views in only the last couple of days making them is SO easy it feels unfair. STEP 1: find a strange character on pinterest, turn it into a character sheet with chatgpt. STEP 2: download any viral video, swap the person using Higgsfield Genjutsu. use this prompt: "replace the person in @ video1 with the character from @ image1. keep the same motion, camera movement, color grading, lighting, framing, and overall video quality." DONE. the money part is in the full blueprint below.

She’s a 10 but she’s bundled

AI and vibecoding has become so strong that I don't actually think people are aware of how easy is to make the 'good' we're seeing in the trenches. It's some what proof that even with the most accessibility to tech we've ever seen, it's useless without truly creative humans.

If you own the fomo @skybri please dm me.

SPEC.fun by the numbers. 184 coins launched 102,000+ trades $10.7M in volume And 36 launches used rules written by other people in the marketplace. 5 more hooks are coming out very, very soon. Stay tuned.

New hook alert: AI Agents. Your coin's fees fund an AI agent. Pick its model. It trades. Profits get airdropped to your holders. Stack it with rules and it gets interesting. More will be added to this hook as there are a lot of possibilities.

Asked Claude fable “spec.fun/ hookedpad.com/ Examine both of these and just based on tech alone which one is better launchpad” It chose spec

why am i buying coins when im in e/acc

we'll see the rise in idolization of characters that win lotteries. there will be thousands of Kimchis all being clipped to promote a new way to gamble. click some buttons and win forever. but there is no winning forever. there's always more and the more you make, the more you can now lose. think of how many people in this space are defined by how much they once had. count no man happy until he's dead. as the season of spawning life changing wealth on our computers continues, i suggest you think seriously about what you'll do if you make a lot. what will you actually do with your days? if you can't answer that, it's easy to find another trade while you figure it out. then another. eventually either the number changes or you go bust. if you want to trade forever, stop trading like you need to make it all tonight. if your goal is to hit a number and fuck off, you'll probably never leave.

The fact that e/acc wicked to ATH off a simple Elon tweet is quite funny, and it tells me most of you don't understand what makes this coin good beyond the basic premise that Elon interacts with Beff a lot. Over the past year, Elon has interacted with him twice a week on average, and that's not even counting the e/acc posts he engages with. Elon interacting with Beff is literally the base case. Most of you trade so myopically that you can't piece together how much bigger this is than any single catalyst. Ask yourself what happens when Kardashev starts shipping tech and thousands of e/acc cult members pitch in simply because they believe in the movement, all armed with models that are basically AGI in most relevant fields. Not to mention, Kardashev aligns closely with Elon's early vision for OpenAI. this coin is the only possible exposure u can get If you jeeted on some irrelevant Elon candle, consider raising your targets.

The e/acc conversion funnel NEVER doom

They call this the $12 and a dream ape

Maybe my pnl’s aren’t like the other crazy 5-6 figure ones you see but I’m proud of the small wins. They add up. @fomo

$10,000 to someone who likes and reposts this … BUT need Yankees and cubs ML 😂😂😂 Gamby picks

Never doom. Always accelerate. e/acc

We’re accelerating at alarming rates

Every great investment has periods of relative underperformance. If you can't stomach multiple 50–90% drawdowns, you'll never hit a notable trade. The path to 9 figs for e/acc is extremely clear now, but I'll lay it out for those who don't see the vision yet. There are a few components to this trade. First and most obvious: the cult. I won't waste words repeating what I've already said about e/acc, but it is THE AI cult. In most cult coins, collective belief creates a feedback loop where holders have a financial incentive to spread the memetic virus, and every new believer strengthens that incentive. The core difference with e/acc is that, in addition to the memetic reflexivity, the loop is aimed at a process that is itself a feedback loop, and one with far more direct economic implications: technological acceleration, where every advance speeds up the next. We're in the final stretch of the parabola toward the singularity, which compresses the time horizon for this trade from years to weeks or months. I think Beff chose to seize this moment for exactly the same reason. That's why I believe e/acc is the most reflexive "meme" to ever grace the trenches. Second and most important: founder alignment. This is the component that ties the whole trade together (at these prices), and the one a lot of people will midcurve. Most people tend to forget that Beff's entire life mission revolves around e/acc and spreading its vision at any cost. The coin is a vessel for that ambition, a hyperstition that helps the vision materialise as price appreciates. I'll personally keep adding as we go higher. I've studied many of the greatest trades of past cycles, and most of the biggest winners on multi bil coins sized in around 100M, The higher price goes, the clearer the vision becomes to sidelined capital, and the more of it pours in. i really cant think of many scenarios where this coin stops after it gets going

E/ACC all caps.

Point-form recap of the space discussing / brainstorming @Kardashev_AI - ICYMI: -Turning e/acc into a formal institution. The organizers want to move beyond memes, posting, and informal group chats into scientific papers, philosophy, policy proposals, and sustained influence. They said the nonprofit had been under discussion for over a year. -Leadership and initial setup. Beff/Gill would serve as chairman and help with fundraising while continuing to run Extropic. Maxwell, described as having worked with neuroscientist Karl Friston, would run the institute. A domain was purchased, but incorporation, legal structure, staffing, and budgets were still being worked out. -An unexpected financial windfall accelerated the announcement. Beff described unsolicited money arriving through X Money amid crypto/meme activity, reaching roughly $100,000 by late in the conversation. He said he had not launched or owned the associated token and intended to put the proceeds toward the nonprofit. Initial spending would cover legal fees, computers, basic AI usage, and a short period of operations before larger fundraising. -Creating a counterweight to effective altruism and AI-restriction advocacy. Participants argued that AI-risk organizations have far more funding and coordination than e/acc. They anticipated further funding from AI-company wealth and potential IPOs, and wanted an institution capable of responding with research and policy arguments. Those funding forecasts were speculative. -Researching intelligence across biological and artificial systems. Proposed work included thermodynamics, information theory, neuroscience, and alternative computing—especially understanding how intelligence emerges in different physical substrates, rather than focusing exclusively on conventional digital AI. -Exploring hybrid biological–silicon intelligence. One proposed experiment was to connect cultured-neuron computing systems from Cortical Labs with Extropic’s thermodynamic computing hardware. The aim would be to demonstrate a combined biological and artificial intelligence system. This was an exploratory idea, not an announced working prototype. -Developing a deeper intellectual foundation for e/acc. They discussed complex adaptive systems, active inference, economics, and how ideas spread and influence behavior. The ambition was to develop a substantial school of thought, with advancing civilization’s energy use and technological capabilities—the Kardashev-scale framing—as a guiding objective. -Protecting access to AI and compute. A recurring policy theme was the freedom to own computing hardware, train models, use open weights, and run inference independently. Speakers proposed a “First Amendment for synthetic thought” and a “Second Amendment for compute” as advocacy concepts. -Opposing concentrated control and regulatory capture. Participants worried that a few large AI labs could use regulation to exclude competitors and restrict independent AI use. They argued that centralized control, censorship, and authoritarian outcomes deserved greater attention in AI-risk discussions. -Studying markets as a mechanism for AI alignment. Speakers suggested that customer demand, competition, reputation, and liability could encourage useful, reliable models. They criticized safety certification that, in their view, could become procedural theater or shield companies from responsibility. -Connecting autonomous AI with crypto. They speculated about AI agents earning money and paying independent hosts for compute through cryptocurrency. Related ideas included community-funded model training, shared ownership of models, and distributing model revenue to contributors. -Debating nonprofit structure and independence. The group discussed research and lobbying entities, potentially using both 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) structures. A DAO was floated, but the conversation leaned toward a simpler nonprofit structure. They also emphasized avoiding dependence on one dominant donor. -Reaching people outside the tech/Twitter audience. Ana and Shaw stressed that research alone would not be enough. Suggestions included AI-assisted journalist research and outreach, accessible explanations, cultural content, events, and concrete stories about benefits such as better healthcare, more family time, and greater prosperity. -Making optimism credible and actionable. An extended discussion connected pessimistic narratives with “learned helplessness.” Participants argued for a specific, believable picture of a better future that motivates people to act, while acknowledging that broad prosperity and managing job disruption require actual solutions. -Choosing research with tangible public benefits. A participant with lobbying experience suggested focusing on problems that policymakers and ordinary people already care about, particularly healthcare. Maxwell also discussed distinguishing recoverable crises from self-reinforcing catastrophes, using demographic decline as an example. -Next steps and community participation. The organizers planned to formalize the organization, raise additional funds, publish materials explaining its direction, and invite researchers, policy specialists, communicators, and supporters to contribute. No detailed launch schedule or finalized research roadmap was presented. -Other conversation and closing banter. Side topics included Extropic’s progress, AI documentaries and podcasts, crypto-community dynamics, memories of early e/acc Spaces, San Francisco culture, and restaurant automation. The late discussion about a massive nonprofit data center was joking rather than a concrete commitment.

$150k has been sent to @beffjezos over the weekend for a couple of tweets about e/acc. now he's starting a non-profit @Kardashev_AI dedicated to the study of civilizational acceleration. there are entire charities that raise less than he did. congratulations and i look forward to what you do for the cause.