NOTHING ON EARTH LIKE BEING A RED βπ»π΄
- Tweets 19,529
- Following 886
- Followers 5,163
- Likes 58,480
'Only because they make the most revenue'
Wait, I thought you did that? That's what you've been claiming
24
1,848
And you know what, I'd somehow be ok with City getting off 'lightly' if the so-called fanbase actually owned up to it and questioned their owners' behaviour.
But the way they defend it and speak like they're some kind of victims of a big conspiracy DISGUSTS ME, and I cannot wait until there's nothing left of them but a fading stainππ
1
152
City fans somehow manage to compete over who's the stupidest on the timeline every day since the news broke. Impressive, reallyπ
The Premier league is killing its self, buyers canβt show true ambition because they are not allowed to invest to grow their own club.
The Red cartel really are destroying this league.
1
6
409
Reminder that the sum went up every season, if anything it's deluded to think it stopped there.
Likely increased and expanded into other areas and deals. Labeled 'industrial-level cheating' by Ornstein and it's hard to argue against thatπ
ALT Man City, Man City 115
2
197
'Decorated history like no other club'
Man, where is this DELUSION coming from
I can't see a world where City are expelled from the league.
The PL will want a conclusion which 'punishes' City but at the same time doesn't finish them off.
Can you imagine the PL without City? One of the biggest and richest clubs in the world with a decorated...1/3
16
450
The average City fan after everything's been laid on the table and indisputable proof of cheating
11
376
Peep his latest tweets
Letβs also not forget why these financial rules were introduced. To keep the status quo. To keep the top clubs at the top and stop any other teams entering the elite.
They are anti-competitive rules.
Just ask Newcastle & Villa. They have the financial capacity to challenge at the top end of the table, but the only thing stopping them are these rules.
Imagine, in any other form of business, there were rules put in place that limited how much money the owner could invest. Itβs unheard of.
10
473
Just a reminder it'd probably be just shy of 500 charges if the investigation covered the last 8 years too. Demolish and relegateππ
7
402
This reasoning is so stupid. What's the point of applying rules at all if breaking them has no consequences?
Haven't seen one City supporter (know there ain't many) actually accept they've cheated and that consequences should follow. Crazy, huh?
1
222
Maybe you could tell me what he's doing in the air then?
#MUNMCI β 59β VAR OVERTURN
VAR checked the refereeβs call of no goal for offside β and determined that Haaland was in an onside position and recommended that the goal was awarded.
The VAR also deemed that while in an offside position, Fernandez didnβt play the ball.
Community note
Per IFAB Law 11, a player in an offside position can be penalised for clearly attempting to play the ball (or other obvious actions) if it impacts an opponent, even without touching it.
thefa.com/football-rulesβ¦
x.com/TheIFAB/status
7
398
