I ask the right question. Btw who are you to tell others to delete things that not yours.

Bitcoin has been declared dead more than 400 times by media outlets and skeptics since its creation. In 2011, it crashed from $32 to $2, a 94% collapse that had critics calling it a failed experiment. In 2014, the Mt. Gox hack wiped out 850,000 bitcoin:native and dragged the price down to around $150, prompting waves of "I told you so" articles across financial media. The mockery didn't stop there. In 2018, after the euphoric run to nearly $20,000, Bitcoin cratered to roughly $3,200, losing over 80% of its value in less than twelve months. Wall Street veterans lined up to call it a bubble, a Ponzi scheme, digital tulip mania. Jamie Dimon called it a fraud. Countless economists predicted it would go to zero. Then came 2022. The FTX collapse, Terra Luna's implosion, and a brutal bear market pushed Bitcoin down to around $15,500. Institutions pulled back, retail investors panicked, and once again, obituaries were written. Every single time, Bitcoin came back. No company issued a bailout. No government stepped in to save it. There was no CEO, no headquarters, no marketing department fighting to keep the narrative alive. Just code, a decentralized network, and millions of people who kept believing, kept building, and kept holding. Today, Bitcoin trades near $85,000, a price that would have sounded like fantasy to the people writing its eulogy in 2011, 2014, 2018, or 2022. Bitcoin was never destroyed by its critics. It was tested, over and over, and every test only proved how resilient a truly decentralized system can be. The lesson isn't that Bitcoin is invincible. It's that conviction built on fundamentals tends to outlast noise built on fear. #PiArt

chóng mặt chớ, nhưng nhảy tiếp thôi.

But claiming that Protocol V27 is the final upgrade when it's actually not doesn't make any sense at all

so excited.

Bitcoin and crypto markets are increasingly tied to the US political calendar, and the 2026 midterm elections could shape momentum through the rest of the year. Congress will decide who controls the House and Senate, which directly affects whether pending market structure legislation, like the CLARITY Act, becomes law or stalls further. A pro-crypto Congress could accelerate regulatory clarity around stablecoins and token classification, while a shift toward stricter oversight could slow institutional adoption. Historically, Bitcoin has entered bearish phases in the months leading up to midterms, only to recover once results are confirmed. Analysts point to this pattern from 2014, 2018, and 2022, though three data points are not enough to call it a guaranteed cycle. If the trend holds, a similar dip could precede the November 2026 vote, followed by a potential relief rally regardless of which party wins, since uncertainty itself often weighs more on markets than the actual outcome. With spot ETFs now embedded in the market and some entities holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset, liquidity conditions are different from prior cycles, so past patterns could play out differently this time. #PiArt

Wish to be here once.

We do

Ask a question.

Just an explain to make things clear when it got confused.

Sad to hear

magnificent view bro

Read it again.

Really appreciate you if you screenshot those lines

You're welcomed here to show your knowledge.

I haven't seen it. But, the point is whether Stellar has or hasn't done it. What we should focus is PCT announcements to Pi community. This could profoundly affect the credibility of their future announcements.

Did Stellar announce any final protocol upgrades?

Don't you really understand what "final" means?

How many get confused that PCT had stated the Protocol V27 was the final planned upgrade. But now there's Protocol 28. Will PCT explain this?

Who knows. The day will come. I want that too.